Jump to content


have a question about game against Ravens

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
4 replies to this topic

#1 Jay Roland

Jay Roland
  • Member
  • 1215 posts

Posted 09 January 2013 - 07:29 AM

After letting the loss set in i have a question. On the 4th & 1 where we got the pass intercepted why did we call a formation with no RB? it seems to me that it showed the Ravens it was a pass play all the way and they could put more men in coverage that way. If we had at least a RB they had to respect the fact we might run it. If we could have scored there the game may or may not have turned out different but it was just a moment to me that i just don't understand. can anyone explain to me why that formation was called.

Go Colts!!! Bleed Blue

Game Rewind: Relive every NFL moment…subscribe to Game Rewind. Relive every NFL moment…subscribe to Game Rewind.

#2 HungarianColtsFan

  • Member
  • 2808 posts

Posted 09 January 2013 - 07:59 AM

Good question.


I think they've called "all in" to score at least 1 TD and tried to call an aggressive passing play. There was nothing to loose, too bad it failed. At that time Ravens succeeded almost anything, and we didn't. I think an Arians-like long passing play'd made more sense, but just my 2 cents.


#3 Jason_S

  • Member
  • 6306 posts

Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:47 AM

i suspect you'd have to call Clyde Christensen for an answer to that question. ;)

They say you can catch more flies with honey than you can with vinegar, but does anyone know what the final tally was?  And why didn't they try manure?  And if they did, how would that have changed the saying?  Would it be, "you can catch more flies with honey than you can with vinegar, but you'll catch the most if you're full of crap?"  

#4 lollygagger8

  • Member
  • 4856 posts

Posted 09 January 2013 - 09:01 AM

Exactly. Clyde was calling the plays and that play call was pretty dumb.


I guess we had been telegraphing the run all day, so he probably figured, heck why not the pass too?

#5 BrentMc11

  • Member
  • 12830 posts

Posted 09 January 2013 - 09:03 AM

In theory it is supposed to force the Ravens to play Man to Man across the board and exploit a blitz package to "the big play."  Our line was not equipped to handle their 'man' responsibilities even without going empty backfield....thus Luck probably forced the issue like he and other rookies have done many times before.  I am trying to visualize that specific play......whether Luck did force it...or aim it as I like to say.


If someone can capture and post we could discuss even more as to actual blocking assignments etc.????   :thmup:

Change is good!  




Single Game Tickets Available!

Join the Stampede!

Recent Status Updates

  • Photo
      31 Oct

    I was listening to CBS sideline Thursday Night Football reporter Tracy Wolfson talk about Saints WR Kenny Stills having to "tape up his groin" in the 2nd half & that phrase made me cringe because ankles I get, but tape & a sensitive region of the body doesn't sound all that wonderful to me. Enough said.

    Show comments (4)
  • Photo
      31 Oct

    Preparing for my second Indy trip. A stopover but a long trip none the less. I want a Colts victory but wonder what the Indy weather surprise me. Last year on my first trip to the LOS it was cold, my first trip this year it rained!

    Show comments (2)
  • Photo
      31 Oct

    They stopped giving me Candy when I was 16 cause I was 6'1and they thought I was older than 16. 4 years later I'm 20 & 6'4...... but this time around, I have little cousins that I shall invoke my "Accompanying" 5% Charge on their collections tonight :). Who says Halloween isn't for us older folks? Haha

    Show comments (5)
View All Updates