Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

We need Cincy to win, too


oldunclemark

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think this is what most people think. I would like to play denver because of the whole Colts vs. Peyton. However I think he will just kick our a**.

The only way we get out of the divisional round would be playing the Patriots. It could snow big time up there and minimizing the strong suite of the Patriots offense. I hate to count on weather to play a factor because it proves we are not the same calibur of team as they are. However, would you really take the Pats running game over our running game?

I know statisically they are probably better, but to me I say were probably pretty even on the running games.

Ok... Umm the snow wouldnt stop the Pats air attack.. Brady has had many many good games in the snow.

 

Also with BOTH Gronk and hernandez back our running attack be a lot better and Ridley is the best RB on either team.

 

A snowy day only make the colts ONE demensional not NE or Denver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok... Umm the snow wouldnt stop the Pats air attack.. Brady has had many many good games in the snow.

 

Also with BOTH Gronk and hernandez back our running attack be a lot better and Ridley is the best RB on either team.

 

A snowy day only make the colts ONE demensional not NE or Denver.

 

I agree with you on Brady in the snow, but Peyton doesn't do well in the snow. If Peyton doesn't perform Denver is in trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Experinece is good but wins are better...

I'm surprised at how many people are assuming we'll lose Sunday.

Assuming we defeat Baltimore....you WANT to have that chance for a home game

..and I'd much rather go against a team we know on Jan. 13 than Denver on Jan. 12...

 

I don't think it matters how well we know the Pats, I don't think we can beat them. I don't think we can beat the Broncos, either, but I'd rather lose to Manning than to Brady.

 

Before any of that matters, we need to win a playoff game on the road against a pretty good team, which is something we haven't done this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its obvious you have a better shot at a team you've played..and know

The assumption that we cant beat NE or Denver may be accurate...but it kinda flies in the face of last week's results..

Obvioulsy we need to beat Baltimore for this to matter..that goes without saying..and was assumed in the post

.....but the point (once again) is that for us to have a home AFC title game....

........we need Cincinatti to beat Houston and then Denver..not impossible

....I understand everybody saying it cant happen... but there is an outside chance.

,.....kinda like the chance that a 2-14 team could go 11-5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its obvious you have a better shot at a team you've played..and know

 

I disagree if that team pounded you by five touchdowns. But I think we're equally outmatched against either the Broncos or the Pats. If you feel more comfortable because we've already seen the Pats, that's fine; I can kind of understand that. I still don't think it matters.

 

The assumption that we cant beat NE or Denver may be accurate...but it kinda flies in the face of last week's results..

 

I don't see how that's true. We beat Houston at home, after losing to them on the road. We haven't beat a good team on the road all season long.

 

Obvioulsy we need to beat Baltimore for this to matter..that goes without saying..and was assumed in the post

.....but the point (once again) is that for us to have a home AFC title game....

........we need Cincinatti to beat Houston and then Denver..not impossible

....I understand everybody saying it cant happen... but there is an outside chance.

,.....kinda like the chance that a 2-14 team could go 11-5.

 

Yeah, any given Sunday, and all that. I definitely agree with that approach. I'm just embracing the fact that it would be a colossal upset for us to go into either Denver or New England and beat either of those two teams at any point in these playoffs. If it happens, I'll be through the roof, but I'm gonna keep both feet on the ground for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The entire season has been a colossal upset, agreed?

'

The 'assumption' was that we would not defeat Houston...and we did..that's the paralell I was drawing...

there is a similar assumption now..We've all been wrong again and again 'keeping both feet on the ground' and saying we were

overmatched.....even when we were. seems like just a quest to be correct

Many here feel we're one-and-done and we've accomplished the goal. I admit I didnt get that memo yet.

Looking at it that way...It seems obvious that we have a better chance to reach the Super Bowl if we play at home (where we agree we are very good)

..and to not play in Denver where there are built-in atmnospheric disadvantges...(plus the AFC's No.1 rated team)

For us to get back home this season, we need Cincinatti to win, too..

Its as crazy as us being 11-5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

question colt fans:

 

IF it is a snowy day which team would you prefer to face? NE or Denver in the snow?

 

Denver. And for me it isn't even close. Playing in January in the snow, in Foxboro of all places, in the playoffs, does not sound like an ideal situation. On the flip side, I don't remember too many snowy games where Peyton had a huge day passing. Denver all the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mark be honest

 

You just don't want to see a Manning v Luck match up. That's the feeling I get. The Pats would shred the Colts D and they will be healthier this time than last time(Hernandez back + both our starting guards). 

 

Anyways it's supposed to be cloudy w/ a little rain in Foxborough next Sun. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also wanted the other WC team to lose to increase our odds, hopefully.

 

Also....olduncle, this Cincy D has been solid but the O has had major issues. That team was in no way going to go all the way to the title game. No way. Denver would have destroyed Dalton IMO. I know they had a tough game in Cincy this year already but Mile High is different. I think it would have been a real low pressure game for Manning vs. Dalton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The roster page has now been updated, Ogletree is no longer listed as on the exempt list. So my bad, Holder was right.    Good news.
    • Was that the only good receiver taken in that draft? And did they give up multiple picks?
    • Yeah, I have no beef with MHJ as a prospect (I think some are pumping him up a little too much, and there's some name recognition probably influencing the way he's talked about). It would be awesome to have him on the Colts. But just like every other draft prospect in history, the possibility exists that he will not live up to the pre-draft expectations.    But during the pre-draft process, fans and media start falling in love with players. Terms like "generational talent," "future superstar," etc., start getting thrown around. And now we're talking about a prospect as if he's a lock for the HOF before he's even played a game in the NFL. That's fine, it's fun, we all do it. But that's different from actually scouting, setting a board, and making decisions for the team.   Each of us can point to a previous prospect that we loved and raved about and had them fitted for a gold jacket, but who bounced out of the league within 3-4 years. And the same is probably true for NFL scouts and decision makers. Which is why Ballard's comment today -- there is no such thing as a perfect prospect -- is so important to remember. I'm not against the team identifying a guy they really want and going up to get him, but I hope they're not just doing it with stars in their eyes.
    • Would Cincy have made the SB without taking Chase at #5. I got the answer, and it is easy, it is a FAT NO. They would have never got by KC as great as Burrow is. Giving up next years 1st round pick isn't the end of the world to land a generational WR. We still have picks in rounds 2-7 if we did that. 
    • Definitely was, but essentially all of them received the same punishment initially.     Just thought it was curious, especially right before the draft. Has to put the CB spot for the Eagles in limbo.     Been wondering if Jontay Porter's NBA lifetime ban had any play in the decision.   Rodgers did bet on his own team.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...