Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Archer

ESPN's AFC Playoff Questions

16 posts in this topic

Yeah, we'll ESPN needs to review their predictions for the Colts since August and see how we'll they've done.

On another disgusting note, when I was driving back from Indy on Monday I switched on Mad Dog radio on Sirius. I'm not sure if it was Russo on the air, but the way he talked about the Colts was completely disrespectful.

He said they used up all their emotion on the game Sunday, and their dancing after the game shows they aren't going any farther. He said we'll get killed by the Ravens. The disdain in his voice made it sound like he lost money on the game.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

*Yawns*

 

Just more Hate & Jealousy being thrown towards us. It's like watching TV these days, nothing but Reruns :bored:

 

Someone wake me up when they say something NEW.  :sleepy:  They've been doubting us since August. 11-5 sure says a lot about a "Rebuilding" Team. Don't worry, "Rebuilding" Teams predicted to Win 2 games go 11-5 ALL the Time. Yep, that's definitely not surprising to anyone. :sarcasm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So the Colts were 1 of the 3 winning teams the Pats beat. What does that say about the Pats then with that line of thinking?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ESPN's 10 Questions about the AFC playoffs had a pessimistic section on the Colts:

 

  • "4. Can the Colts continue to surprise? As inspirational as the Colts have been this season, they're playing at an entirely different level this week. The emotional edge they gained by playing for sidelined coach Chuck Pagano most of the year won't mean as much when their opponents raise their own intensity level in the postseason. Remember, the Colts have only three wins over teams with winning records this season. Their offense also has nine starters who have never appeared in a postseason game, including four rookies. So, although the long-term future looks extremely bright in Indianapolis -- especially with first-year quarterback Andrew Luck growing up so quickly -- this coming weekend might not be nearly as much fun to watch."

 

That part about the Colts only winning three games against winning opponents stuck in my craw.  After all, there were only six winning teams in the AFC, all of which made the playoffs.  So, that "3 wins against winning teams" has to be true of just about every team in the AFC.  So, I looked at the Pats, and, sure enough, they have the same 3-3 record as the Colts against winning teams.  Colts: wins against Hou, Minn, and GB, losses against HOU, NE, and Chic.  NE: wins against Hou, Indy, and Denver, losses against SF, SEA, and Balt.  Baltimore only seems to have won two games against winning opponents (NE and NYG).  The Ravens lost to Hou, Washington, Denver, and Cincy, leading to a 2-4 record against winning teams.  Wonder why they key on the Colts when it comes to this issue about only beating three winning teams?  Ridiculous!

Heres where the rubber meets the road, How many of those wins was on the road for the Colts? we got whipped in NE, we hung with the Texans in Texas but lost and vs the NFC we did beat GB and MN but both wins were at home, hard earned wins but at home, I think we earned a little respect when we beat GB and the Texans but to earn ALOT of respect you have to be able to win on the road vs elite teams, Teams that are in the playoffs year in and year out and it starts this sunday

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Heres where the rubber meets the road, How many of those wins was on the road for the Colts? we got whipped in NE, we hung with the Texans in Texas but lost and vs the NFC we did beat GB and MN but both wins were at home, hard earned wins but at home, I think we earned a little respect when we beat GB and the Texans but to earn ALOT of respect you have to be able to win on the road vs elite teams, Teams that are in the playoffs year in and year out and it starts this sunday

 

Agree with you on this 100%. On the other hand, it can also be asked what exactly anyone has seen out of Baltimore lately to make them believe that it may not "be fun to watch" this weekend for Colts fans. This team certainly isn't NE, or even the Texans for that matter. I am not saying we will win, but I certainly think we have a good chance to do so. The Ravens have shown little to nothing the past few weeks to make me believe they are going to paste us. While they looked good against the Giants, I am not sure any team can put any stock into beating or losing to a team that so up and down all season. Outside of that game they have looked incredibly ordinary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have a better record than Balt.

We have a better record against teams with a winning record than Balt.

We have won 5 of our last 6, including the ousting of the presumed #1 seed

They have lost 4 of their last 5 and needed overtime to beat the Chargers...

They have a lot of key players injured, some will start, but with diminished effectiveness

We just came off of our most complete game of the season...

 

I'm not saying its a slam dunk or anything, but we got the best match-up we could've hoped for. We have a realistic shot at winning this game, regardless of what the talking heads say....

7 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We have a better record than Balt.

We have a better record against teams with a winning record than Balt.

We have won 5 of our last 6, including the ousting of the presumed #1 seed

They have lost 4 of their last 5 and needed overtime to beat the Chargers...

They have a lot of key players injured, some will start, but with diminished effectiveness

We just came off of our most complete game of the season...

 

I'm not saying its a slam dunk or anything, but we got the best match-up we could've hoped for. We have a realistic shot at winning this game, regardless of what the talking heads say....

If it was up to me, this would be plastered everywhere. Right on.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here's a breakdown to show how ridiculous that statement is.

AFC vs teams with winning records:

 

Broncos: 2-3

- Loss @ Falcons

- Loss vs Texans

- Loss @ Patriots

- Win @ Bengals

- Win @ Ravens

_____________________

 

Patriots: 3-3

- Loss @ Ravens

- Win vs Broncos

- Loss @ Seahawks

- Win vs Colts

- win vs Texans

- Loss vs 49ers

_____________________

 

Texans: 4-4

- Win @ Broncos

- Loss vs Packers

- Win vs Ravens

- Win @ Bears

- Loss @ Patriots

- Win vs Colts

- Loss vs Vikings

- Loss @ Colts

_____________________

 

Ravens: 3-4

- Win vs Bengals 

- Win vs Patriots

- Loss @ Texans

- Loss @ Redskins

- Loss vs Broncos

- Win vs Giants

- Loss @ Bengals

_____________________

 

Colts: 3-3

- Loss @ Bears

- Win vs Vikings

- Win vs Packers

- Loss @ Patriots

- Loss @ Texans

- Win vs Texans

_____________________

 

Bengals: 3-2

- Loss @ Ravens

- Win @ Redskins

- Loss vs Broncos

- Win vs Giants

- Win vs Ravens

_____________________

 

So by this knowledge the Colts are better than the Broncos and equal to the Patriots.. The Bengals are the only team with a winning record against NFL teams WITH winning records.

  In conclusion, it is obvious the Bengals will win the AFC.  :thmup:

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well in my opinion those winning records don't mean much because when the playoffs start everyone starts with a clean slate. :)  Just depends on who plays the better game on that given day. :thmup:  GO COLTS bring home a WIN :monkeydance:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, we'll ESPN needs to review their predictions for the Colts since August and see how we'll they've done.

On another disgusting note, when I was driving back from Indy on Monday I switched on Mad Dog radio on Sirius. I'm not sure if it was Russo on the air, but the way he talked about the Colts was completely disrespectful.

He said they used up all their emotion on the game Sunday, and their dancing after the game shows they aren't going any farther. He said we'll get killed by the Ravens. The disdain in his voice made it sound like he lost money on the game.

We've had emotional wins all season.....I think that Russo talk is an uneducated opinion by someone who clearly hasnt been watching the Colts all year...

The Green Bay win wasmore emotional than Houston...and the win at detroit was more dramatic.

We match up with the Ravens

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Here's a breakdown to show how ridiculous that statement is.

AFC vs teams with winning records:

 

Broncos: 2-3

- Loss @ Falcons

- Loss vs Texans

- Loss @ Patriots

- Win @ Bengals

- Win @ Ravens

_____________________

 

Patriots: 3-3

- Loss @ Ravens

- Win vs Broncos

- Loss @ Seahawks

- Win vs Colts

- win vs Texans

- Loss vs 49ers

_____________________

 

Texans: 4-4

- Win @ Broncos

- Loss vs Packers

- Win vs Ravens

- Win @ Bears

- Loss @ Patriots

- Win vs Colts

- Loss vs Vikings

- Loss @ Colts

_____________________

 

Ravens: 3-4

- Win vs Bengals 

- Win vs Patriots

- Loss @ Texans

- Loss @ Redskins

- Loss vs Broncos

- Win vs Giants

- Loss @ Bengals

_____________________

 

Colts: 3-3

- Loss @ Bears

- Win vs Vikings

- Win vs Packers

- Loss @ Patriots

- Loss @ Texans

- Win vs Texans

_____________________

 

Bengals: 3-2

- Loss @ Ravens

- Win @ Redskins

- Loss vs Broncos

- Win vs Giants

- Win vs Ravens

_____________________

 

So by this knowledge the Colts are better than the Broncos and equal to the Patriots.. The Bengals are the only team with a winning record against NFL teams WITH winning records.

  In conclusion, it is obvious the Bengals will win the AFC.  :thmup:

 

It juts seems like national commeneters simply dont want to spend a lot of time THINKING about the Colts so they make simplistic snap judgements...

Its not all Andrew Luck and its not all 'playing for Chuck'

We have some veteran players on defense..and we drafted a strike force offensively

If we win at Baltimore....major eyes will open

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We have a better record than Balt.

We have a better record against teams with a winning record than Balt.

We have won 5 of our last 6, including the ousting of the presumed #1 seed

They have lost 4 of their last 5 and needed overtime to beat the Chargers...

They have a lot of key players injured, some will start, but with diminished effectiveness

We just came off of our most complete game of the season...

 

I'm not saying its a slam dunk or anything, but we got the best match-up we could've hoped for. We have a realistic shot at winning this game, regardless of what the talking heads say....

Pretty much says it all.  Also add the factor that Luck has been playing much better and more careful the past 3 weeks and you've got a pretty good idea of what's to come this Sunday.  Even with Ray "Lewish" (I'm saying ish, because he's not really 100%) I think the Colts can score enough points to win this game.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We have a better record than Balt.

We have a better record against teams with a winning record than Balt.

We have won 5 of our last 6, including the ousting of the presumed #1 seed

They have lost 4 of their last 5 and needed overtime to beat the Chargers...

They have a lot of key players injured, some will start, but with diminished effectiveness

We just came off of our most complete game of the season...

I'm not saying its a slam dunk or anything, but we got the best match-up we could've hoped for. We have a realistic shot at winning this game, regardless of what the talking heads say....

All of that got thrown out once Ray Lewis announced Retirement. Smh. Watch they get motivated now and start playing good

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That was last year.... not the case for this year... we are playing like zombies out there 
    • My point when I explain what the Colts did in 2013 is to remind posters here that we DID try to address the problem.   Posters repeated ask why hasn't Grigson tried to do more sooner?      What was he waiting for?      I'm simply reminding fans that Grigson invested serious money and draft picks hoping to solve our OL problem in his 2nd year.      We needed to give those moves time to either pan out and work,   or not pan out and get cut.      In the last few years,  he's added Mewhort,  Good, and Kelly,  and Reitz improved the quality of his game.      But we are still not a cohesive unit yet.     Unfortunately,  the OL often takes time to gell and became a solid working unit.       And that's where we are now.....    waiting for the unit to come together.   But we will likely take a step back this week.     Good is out with a bad back,  and I'm not sure how he's going to get replaced?        
    • I haven't seen one Chargers game all year not even Preseason football. I know Philip Rivers will play lights out like he normally does. However, it's difficult to make a prediction or score off a team I haven't watched once since Sept. 11th though.    I guess I abstain from any projections due to a lack of visual evidence or game viewership on my part. If our DBs are banged up our out, Rivers will have a field day with our secondary unfortunately. 
    • so true, but they are as banged up on offense as we've been on D. Looking at their skill positions and they will be without Gates, Oliver, and Johnson in addition to Woodhead and Allen...  I guess I'm not buying Melvin Gordon, yet.    I'm a homer all the way, but I still think that we win this one by more than a TD. 
    • 1 less than glowing complement about our GM does not mean that I am throwing out the baby with the bathwater CC1. You will recall that I complemented Grigs on Kelly, Anderson, & Parry correct?    Not exactly demanding that Grigs be tarred & feathered am I now? It's a little hard to make the case that SW1 is Mr. "negativity" after that. Also, there's a difference between crucifying a GM & pointing out that no front office execute gets gold stars for failures that never came to fruition BTW. The NFL isn't Kindergarten; No one gets a participation ribbon for just trying or showing up. 
  • Welcome New Members

  • Members

    • GoColtsGo5150

      GoColtsGo5150 194

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Sedall

      Sedall 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 1,706

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Moe

      Moe 17

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 14

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • needanoline63

      needanoline63 153

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jskinnz

      jskinnz 3,108

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.