Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

DS3

I Find That As A Insult....

Recommended Posts

The Ravens rested their starters the last week of the season when there was a chance they could've gotten the #3 seed. basically they're saying, they rather play us than the bengals. well they got what they wished for. I hope we win, and make there decision look bad...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a good chance we will.

 

Colts 27 Ravens 24 with AV kicking a game winning FG at Baltimore, AGAIN!!! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, If This Game Was In Indy I Would Be A lot More Confident But Joe Flacco Has Never Been One And Done In The Playoffs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, If This Game Was In Indy I Would Be A lot More Confident But Joe Flacco Has Never Been One And Done In The Playoffs.

 

There is always a first!!! Pats never lost in the divisional round coming off a bye week, that came to an end in 2010 after the Pats went 4 straight times (2001, 2003, 2004, 2007) without a loss off a bye week. Flacco has gone 4 years too, right, without a one and done??? :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Ravens Rested Their Starters The Last Week Of The Season When There Was A Chance They Could've Gotten The #3 Seed. Basically They're Saying, They Rather Play Us Than The Bengals. Well They Got What They Wished For. I Hope We Win, And Make There Decision Look Bad...

 

For the Ravens to get the 3rd seed, the Patriots would need to lose, against MIA, in Foxboro, with a bye and potentially HFA on the line.

 

There wasn't a chance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For the Ravens to get the 3rd seed, the Patriots would need to lose, against MIA, in Foxboro, with a bye and potentially HFA on the line.

 

There wasn't a chance.

Yeah But There Game Started At 1 Pm While The Patriots Game Started At 4 Pm. So They Could've Won That Game And New England Could've Loss Later All Thought They Didn't

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I dont want to be disrespectful but god, I get lost losing your posts with those capital letters

Sorry Man...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
my guess is they thought den and ne would handle their business.

 

The deal was they did not want to chance the fact the Texans could lose to the Colts (silly them :)).

 

So, they went assuming Texans would win and thus the Pats could tank their game, ala 2005 if they knew they were at the No.3 spot to get to the No.4 spot if both the Texans and Ravens won their games in the 1 p.m. ET slot.

 

The Ravens could only control their end of the bargain i.e. making sure they retained the No.4 spot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Ravens Rested Their Starters The Last Week Of The Season When There Was A Chance They Could've Gotten The #3 Seed. Basically They're Saying, They Rather Play Us Than The Bengals. Well They Got What They Wished For. I Hope We Win, And Make There Decision Look Bad...

 

Or it could be that they just wanted to get some players rested given they had no shot at a bye week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Or it could be that they just wanted to get some players rested given they had no shot at a bye week.

True, I'm Just Saying...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think the Ravens  OR Bengals  seeding was going to change, no matter what the outcome of the game.

Could be wrong, but that is how I understood it...  :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Or it could be that they just wanted to get some players rested given they had no shot at a bye week.

that   :agree:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't think the Ravens  OR Bengals  seeding was going to change, no matter what the outcome of the game.

Could be wrong, but that is how I understood it...  :dunno:

Yeah If The Ravens Won, And Patriots Loss The Ravens Could Have Gotten The #3 Seed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ravens put more faith in N.E and Den winning their games. Ravens could have used the bye week though so who knows, maybe they are trying to avoid N.E for as long as possible

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah If The Ravens Won, And Patriots Loss The Ravens Could Have Gotten The #3 Seed

Well, that is true, but that wasn't going to happen, and I think they knew.

I guess what I had heard was the Bengals seeding would not change, and evidentally that was true.  They won and are still 6th seed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Put Vontae on Tory and try not to let Rice dominate and I can't see them scoring many pts. At the same time I can't see us scoring many points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you're reading into it too much.  The Ravens were guaranteed a playoff spot and the division crown.  They took their starters out to keep them healthy rather than because of the implications losing the game would have on their playoff matchup

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Ravens rested their starters the last week of the season when there was a chance they could've gotten the #3 seed. basically they're saying, they rather play us than the bengals. well they got what they wished for. I hope we win, and make there decision look bad...

 

 

actually the ravens would still have had the 4th seed and be playing the colts. even if they won they would still be a game behind the texans. only way they would have got 3rd seed is if new england got beat which wasnt going to happen. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly think they need to change the rules on location of playoff games. I believe who ever has the best record of the two teams playing should get home field for that game. 

 

Ravens - 10-6

 

Colts - 11-5

 

Ravens lose 4 of their last 5 games, barely win the division and the colts get one more win then the ravens and yet the colts have to travel to baltimore. sorry but i feel the team with the better record should be rewarded for having the better record and get the home game in the playoffs. its just my opinion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Had the Ravens won & NE lost the Ravens had the tie-breaker with their 31-30 win over NE.

I disagree with the whiners about calling it resting your players.

#1 you are letting ANYONE dinged up / HEAL UP

#2 you are limiting risk of injury for top players in a meaningless game

There is only ONE GOAL at seasons start

Winning in the Playoffs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Had the Ravens won & NE lost the Ravens had the tie-breaker with their 31-30 win over NE.

I disagree with the whiners about calling it resting your players.

#1 you are letting ANYONE dinged up / HEAL UP

#2 you are limiting risk of injury for top players in a meaningless game

There is only ONE GOAL at seasons start

Winning in the Playoffs

This may be a first.  I am agreeing with you. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I honestly think they need to change the rules on location of playoff games. I believe who ever has the best record of the two teams playing should get home field for that game.

Ravens - 10-6

Colts - 11-5

Ravens lose 4 of their last 5 games, barely win the division and the colts get one more win then the ravens and yet the colts have to travel to baltimore. sorry but i feel the team with the better record should be rewarded for having the better record and get the home game in the playoffs. its just my opinion

I can argue both ways. You win your division you host a game, period. But you also get 12-4 colts going to 8-8 chargers like in 2008.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reggie Wayne just said on the Reggie Wayne Show that the Players are well aware of the fact that the Ravens wanted to play them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Had the Ravens won & NE lost the Ravens had the tie-breaker with their 31-30 win over NE.

I disagree with the whiners about calling it resting your players.

#1 you are letting ANYONE dinged up / HEAL UP

#2 you are limiting risk of injury for top players in a meaningless game

There is only ONE GOAL at seasons start

Winning in the Playoffs

 

And you think sending in our scrubs and getting trashed yesteday would have been better preperation for Baltimore than what we witnessed yesterday? We've tried resting, and we've won nada. Pagano / Grigson called it just right. Polian / Dungy / Caldwell got it wrong.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully we move on with a win, i dont think they ment resting starters was a insult as much as not wanting injury and thinking new england would not loose at home with alot to play for aganst miami. But you never know! leggoooo indy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I honestly think they need to change the rules on location of playoff games. I believe who ever has the best record of the two teams playing should get home field for that game. 

 

Ravens - 10-6

 

Colts - 11-5

 

Ravens lose 4 of their last 5 games, barely win the division and the colts get one more win then the ravens and yet the colts have to travel to baltimore. sorry but i feel the team with the better record should be rewarded for having the better record and get the home game in the playoffs. its just my opinion

Then you might as well scrap the entire "division" setup and put everyone in one big group. Not only would that be incredibly dull compared to the current set-up, but it would be considerably LESS fair. Unless the teams played every other team in the conference home and away each year, there would be no reasonable basis for determining who actually had a better year than who.

 

In other words, the Colts had a slightly better record than the Ravens essentially because they had a dramatically easier schedule than the Ravens. They won their division and should be rewarded for it. The Wild Card teams are the funky added attraction put in by the league to make things a bit more interesting. They haven't won anything, and should simply be thankful that they made the playoffs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As others have said, the Ravens may simply have just wanted to rest their starters and did not want to risk injury. I don't see anything wrong or insulting about that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Ravens rested their starters the last week of the season when there was a chance they could've gotten the #3 seed. basically they're saying, they rather play us than the bengals. well they got what they wished for. I hope we win, and make there decision look bad...
yea, some of the local reports there were saying the same thing, "let's get Indy, they don't have Manning and Cincy has better defense, special teams, & o-line" and they keep repeating, "No Manning, No problem".......... Ugh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets Get It ON...   

The Ravens rested their starters the last week of the season when there was a chance they could've gotten the #3 seed. basically they're saying, they rather play us than the bengals. well they got what they wished for. I hope we win, and make there decision look bad...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm sorry but the only thing about Balt that scares me is Reed and Lewis.  I enjoy Rice, but we are battle tested against Foster x2, McCluster and a slew of other good backs.  T. Smith isn't a world beater.  He's not either one of the Johnson's or Marshall.  Couple that with the fact that we have an ace up our sleeve in Pagano and I am sure he knows their D forwards and back.  Yes I understand they made tweaks but really its the same Balt d from years past, just older.

 

 

I don't want to sound overly confident but I think Indy is gonna surprise Baltimore and give them more reason to hate us, lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
yea, some of the local reports there were saying the same thing, "let's get Indy, they don't have Manning and Cincy has better defense, special teams, & o-line" and they keep repeating, "No Manning, No problem".......... Ugh.

If true...this is gonna be GOOOOOD!  lol  They could be setting themselves up. 

 

Given the circumstances, you can't really blame them for preferring to play Indy.  But we all wanted the Ravens just as much.  ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I honestly think they need to change the rules on location of playoff games. I believe who ever has the best record of the two teams playing should get home field for that game.

Ravens - 10-6

Colts - 11-5

Ravens lose 4 of their last 5 games, barely win the division and the colts get one more win then the ravens and yet the colts have to travel to baltimore. sorry but i feel the team with the better record should be rewarded for having the better record and get the home game in the playoffs. its just my opinion

I completely agree. Winning the division should only guarantee a playoff game, not a home playoff game. Plus, letting the team with the best record be seeded higher would add importance / competitiveness to late season games. This is a change the NFL needs to make and I cannot believe the talking media heads don't make it an issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another way to look at it. If the Colts were in the Ravens spot, Jacksonville( haha I know Jags in the playoffs pretty funny thought) was in the Bengals spot, and the Bengals in the Colts spot. Who would you rather play in the 1st round. A division foe who always plays you tough or a young over achieving team. Now I realize the Ravens have been pretty good against the Bengals, but a division game is always a tough 1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i'm sorry but the only thing about Balt that scares me is Reed and Lewis.  I enjoy Rice, but we are battle tested against Foster x2, McCluster and a slew of other good backs.  T. Smith isn't a world beater.  He's not either one of the Johnson's or Marshall.  Couple that with the fact that we have an ace up our sleeve in Pagano and I am sure he knows their D forwards and back.  Yes I understand they made tweaks but really its the same Balt d from years past, just older.

 

 

I don't want to sound overly confident but I think Indy is gonna surprise Baltimore and give them more reason to hate us, lol

suggs vs. castonzo scares me. Suggs owned him last year easily his worst game as a colt. For the record I am a castonzo fan too but that match up scares me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I get what you're driving at BLS. I just remember the nightmare known as Curtis Painter in 2011. Translation: Quality backups aren't that easy to find & there's no such thing as an elite 2nd stringer field general. They don't really exist meaning all backup QBs have flaws.    In layman's terms, when the face of your franchise goes down; you're basically screwed that calendar yr anyway because veterans off the street are injury prone with age & recovery issues & anybody worthy of your attention is locked down financially on other team rosters for the short term future. 
    • You can say that again WM. It's like some people think Jacoby will be great just because he was in the same room Brady was studying film a few times.    Look, I respect the hades out of Brady & his SB consistency. I also was amazed at how quickly Jacoby used wrist band numbers to execute our offense in short order. It just bothers me when players & coordinators under BB's coaching tree get all these job interview opportunities  & then when they leave Foxboro their clout fades too.    If anybody breaks this trend of leaving the Boston net & succeeding, Josh McDaniels will be the one to shatter this stigma IMO. [Yes, I think Josh will flourish in his 2nd HC gig too once that preferred vacancy becomes available. This happens a lot with your 2nd shot at the helm running a NFL program.]
    •   The owner of the company says 30 of 32 NFL teams use his service.       I'm sorry he didn't bring out the paper work to show it to you.     But typically,  unless there is reason to believe he's lying,  the man,  in this case,  Cris Collinsworth, gets the benefit of the doubt.   As opposed to you,   who doesn't like the service,  and just denies,  denies,  and denies.....   Oh,  and as for Chip Kelly......     Rich Dudes have lots of ways of making money.    They typically don't chose to make it by buying part of a company that, in the past,  they have openly said negative things about.      Goes to credibility.      They can invest their money elsewhere.   Kelly bought in because he likes what he sees.  
    •   None of those people talk in the 3rd person seriously.   If any of those three talk in the third perosn,   they are mocking themselves and others who do.   And having worked with on-air people who have huge talents,  I think I can say confidently that none of these three guys has an ego the way the current occupent of the White House does.     Not even close.     That man is in a league of his own.   Apologies for the political talk.    
    •     So far,  I confess I don't think of RG3 when I watch Brissett.      I think he's much more of a pocket passer than RG3 ever was.    I saw RG3 as an athlete who could play QB.      I see Brissett as a QB who has some athleticism.   Brissett is taller,  bigger,  heavier.     Not nearly the athlete but much more a physical presense.   6'4" 235 vs. 6'2" and 220.     I think Brissett is going through the normal young QB growth that most every young QB goes through.     I'd expect over time he makes fewer and fewer mistakes.       As for what we'd get for Brissett in a trade....    I don't know if you spend any time in the chat room during a game,  but this past Monday,  I spent some time there,  and when Brissett was good (1st half)  the Colts fans there had us gettng at least a 1st round draft pick for him,  and possibly even more!     I think a Day 2 pick is not far off,   he was taken in the 3rd round and demonstrated a good level of competence in a short amount of time.      I suppose it's possible he'd get only a 4,    but I don't see Brissett getting traded for a 5.     I think Ballard would much rather keep him than trade him for that.      
  • Members