Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Quantum88

How Deep

49 posts in this topic

Colts have played 5 games against playoff teams this year, winning 3.

Green Bay - W

Minnesota - W

New England - L

Houston - L

Houston - W

Unfortunately, all the W's are at home and both of the L's are on the road.

I like our chances against the Ravens, but beyond that, we will have to go the New England or Denver. How deep in the playoffs do you think our run can go?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Colts have played 5 games against playoff teams this year, winning 3.

Green Bay - W

Minnesota - W

New England - L

Houston - L

Houston - W

Unfortunately, all the W's are at home and both of the L's are on the road.

I like our chances against the Ravens, but beyond that, we will have to go the New England or Denver. How deep in the playoffs do you think our run can go?

Colts have played 5 games against playoff teams this year, winning 3.

Green Bay - W

Minnesota - W

New England - L

Houston - L

Houston - W

Unfortunately, all the W's are at home and both of the L's are on the road.

I like our chances against the Ravens, but beyond that, we will have to go the New England or Denver. How deep in the playoffs do you think our run can go?

need
Colts have played 5 games against playoff teams this year, winning 3.

Green Bay - W

Minnesota - W

New England - L

Houston - L

Houston - W

Unfortunately, all the W's are at home and both of the L's are on the road.

I like our chances against the Ravens, but beyond that, we will have to go the New England or Denver. How deep in the playoffs do you think our run can go?

Cincy to beat Houston..which would send us to New England.

..we have a better shot at NE than we do Denver in Colorado

,,and we need Cincy to upset Denver.

..at that point an upset of NE would send us back home where we would be favored to win the AFC.

But, in answer to your question? We'll beat baltimore and that's it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
needCincy to beat Houston..which would send us to New England.

..we have a better shot at NE than we do Denver in Colorado

,,and we need Cincy to upset Denver.

..at that point an upset of NE would send us back home where we would be favored to win the AFC.

But, in answer to your question? We'll beat baltimore and that's it.

Remember that 59 the Pats hung on us with ease earlier this season?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Ravens decided, for whatever reason, to not ride Rice in a ton of games this season.  Three games with over 20 carries, three more with just 20 carries, ten games under 20.  If the Ravens decide to not pound Rice, place the game in Flacco's hands, I think the Colts win.  But I dislike the matchup with either NE or Denver so I say a 1-1 playoff year. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the Colts have a good shot at beating Baltimore.....

 

....I think going against New England or Denver the following week will not turn out well.

 

That said....I'll take a small chance anytime vs. having NO chance.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Remember that 59 the Pats hung on us with ease earlier this season?

I do.....

but would you rather play at Denver (light air wearing downs your guys) or at New England.

Neither is a good choice, granted

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we can take Baltimore but that's probably it, and I wouldn't be all that surprised if we did actually lose to Baltimore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Ravens decided, for whatever reason, to not ride Rice in a ton of games this season.  Three games with over 20 carries, three more with just 20 carries, ten games under 20.  If the Ravens decide to not pound Rice, place the game in Flacco's hands, I think the Colts win.  But I dislike the matchup with either NE or Denver so I say a 1-1 playoff year. 

or did the ravens do that on purpose to keep rice fresh for the post season?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
or did the ravens do that on purpose to keep rice fresh for the post season?

 

Very possible - Rice had one less carry than Gore, had 40 fewer than Ridley even, and still finished 11th in rushing yards.  I simply don't think the Ravens win if Rice gets fewer than 20 carries Sunday.  If for whatever reason the Ravens don't let Rice carry the load, I think it dramatically improves the Colts chances of winning. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AFC championship, yeah I said it!

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to avoid NE at all costs because they are gonna be extremly dangerous with Gronk back and a good runnig game. Thier defense has played well. I think thier the best team in the playoffs as of now. I hope they get beat but thier gonna be a tough act to stop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I say we CAN beat the Ravens, as long as we don't make stupid mistakes. Hopefully this win against Houston won't lead to an emotional let down this weekend. So I will agree with those saying 1-1, but what do I know, I only picked us for 6 wins!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AFC championship, yeah I said it!

Me too!

 

After predicting a 6 win season before the season....I'll be dammed if I'm gonna sell this team short again.

 

Are they a 53-man juggernaut?

 

No.....but neither is any other AFC team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After yesterday and the way we played we can beat anyone.. I think NE will be the hardest... weather is<br />better in Colorado this time of year..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It really depends on which of our teams show up for the games. The team that played yesterday has a chance against anyone.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I do.....

but would you rather play at Denver (light air wearing downs your guys) or at New England.

Neither is a good choice, granted

I'd take my chances on Manning coming back down to earth in the playoffs

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think we can take Baltimore but that's probably it, and I wouldn't be all that surprised if we did actually lose to Baltimore.

 

You've taken sitting on the fence to a new level there Jason...

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we beat the Ravens, then I'd prefer Denver in the Divisional round. Only because they are not 'proven' against the elite teams yet, so they may not be as good as their record suggests (a bit like us?). They could be dynamite of course, and we know that Peyton can do on his day. Our drubbing at Foxboro is not a good sign if we go there.

 

I'm just happy to get this far, anything else is a bonus.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Between Denver and NE, I think I'd prefer Denver.

 

Peyton has been known to have some of his off games in cold weather / playoffs.    Although NE without Edelman and Gronkowski would be less potent that they were in the regular season.  I'm not sure of the status for these two in the playoffs.

 

Also, a Luck / Manning match-up would be fun to watch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want us to win, and I think we will win at best by a FG margin.

 

But the Ravens are tigers at home and paper tigers on the road, so that is always in the back of my mind.

 

Maybe, as soon as I doubt this Colts squad, I will watch them rise as always. :)

 

I just cannot look past this one game, especially if I have enjoyed just living in the moment with this team where every game had question marks and the outcomes have been more favorable than not after the fact. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd rather play Denver than New England.  Partly because the weather in Denver is usually at least passable, and partly because the Colts have been so good in close games, and I think Denver is more likely to let us hang around than New England.  New England certainly has the occasional off day, but they're also probably the more likely of the two to blow us out of the water in the first half and thereby prevent any kind of late-game heroics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Between Denver and NE, I think I'd prefer Denver.

 

Peyton has been known to have some of his off games in cold weather / playoffs.    Although NE without Edelman and Gronkowski would be less potent that they were in the regular season.  I'm not sure of the status for these two in the playoffs.

 

Also, a Luck / Manning match-up would be fun to watch.

 

Pats will have Gronk back. Hernandez didn't play against the Colts. With edelman out that just means more balls to woodhead. Look at what happened yesterday when Gronk and Hernandez were back on the field together. A 28-0 blowout and the Pats were pretty much done halfway into the 4th or it could have been uglier. Pats were also missing two starting guards against the Colts. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Between Denver and NE, I think I'd prefer Denver.

 

Peyton has been known to have some of his off games in cold weather / playoffs.    Although NE without Edelman and Gronkowski would be less potent that they were in the regular season.  I'm not sure of the status for these two in the playoffs.

 

Also, a Luck / Manning match-up would be fun to watch.

 

 

You need to throw a nice tight spiral in bad weather january games. Of the three QB's (Brady Luck and Manning) in this mix , one does not. So .. I'm with you , hoping for a nice windy day in Denver. Of coarse that's putting the horse before the carriage for sure. We need to beat Baltimore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pats will have Gronk back. Hernandez didn't play against the Colts. With edelman out that just means more balls to woodhead. Look at what happened yesterday when Gronk and Hernandez were back on the field together. A 28-0 blowout and the Pats were pretty much done halfway into the 4th or it could have been uglier. Pats were also missing two starting guards against the Colts. 

 

Well, I'm not sure if I were a Pats fan I'd completely trust the running backs, but more likely than not it'll end up being pretty irrelevant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pats will have Gronk back. Hernandez didn't play against the Colts. With edelman out that just means more balls to woodhead. Look at what happened yesterday when Gronk and Hernandez were back on the field together. A 28-0 blowout and the Pats were pretty much done halfway into the 4th or it could have been uglier. Pats were also missing two starting guards against the Colts. 

 

 

Miami didn't have a whole lot to play for. Turn the page back a week and you guys stunk the joint out vs Jacksonville. No question NE has the better team but ya never know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, I'm not sure if I were a Pats fan I'd completely trust the running backs, but more likely than not it'll end up being pretty irrelevant.

 

I get what you're saying but Woodhead is more like a slot receiver than a RB. He splits out to the slot a lot. But on the talk of running backs, individually maybe not but the Patriots run game has been very good this year. 7th in yards, 1st in TDs. Probably the best balanced offense the Pats have had in over a decade. It'll pay dividends, maybe in the AFCCG if there is one. supposed to be as low as 7 degrees with snow in Denver

 

:http://www.accuweather.com/en/us/denver-co/80203/daily-weather-forecast/347810?day=11

 

Patriots will love that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Indy will beat Baltimore...   

 

 

Unfortunately I think we will be 1 and done in Baltimore

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Miami didn't have a whole lot to play for. Turn the page back a week and you guys stunk the joint out vs Jacksonville. No question NE has the better team but ya never know.

 

that game wasn't as close as the score suggests. Pats scored 20 straight points down 13-3. More like they stunk in the first quarter. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would too...     Manning is great.... but .. put pressure on him and hit him a few times....  and....????

 

Manning is not known as Mr. Pressure...     he is no Joe Montana... 

 

Lets get it on....     

 

Indy WILL beat the RAVENS..     and then...    I can't wait.

 

If we beat the Ravens, then I'd prefer Denver in the Divisional round. Only because they are not 'proven' against the elite teams yet, so they may not be as good as their record suggests (a bit like us?). They could be dynamite of course, and we know that Peyton can do on his day. Our drubbing at Foxboro is not a good sign if we go there.

 

I'm just happy to get this far, anything else is a bonus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Realistically, I see us as one and done, in a 14pt blowout. If Flacco stinks up the place, I could see us pulling out the win, but after that I'd expect us to go home. Ravens will run it down our throats I think with rice and pierce.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AFC championship. If Houston advances and plays NE, we could possibly beat them in the AFCCG. A long shot I know, but I only fear the Patriots in the AFC. Realistically we should beat Baltimore, and hopefully play Denver tough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
that game wasn't as close as the score suggests. Pats scored 20 straight points down 13-3. More like they stunk in the first quarter. 

 Geez , I'd call a 16-13 game into the 4th quarter close. NE did go up by 10 but were ahead by only 7 the last 8 minutes of the game. The stats if anything show the Jags playing them very tough. 1 less first down and pretty much outplayed them in every other stat. I'd say this game was eevry bit as close or even closer than the final score indicates.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It really depends on which of our teams show up for the games. The team that played yesterday has a chance against anyone.

I agree, the team that showed up yesterday can play with anybody, this team has so much grit, fight, heart and all of the above, that if they can keep it close they have a chance against any team, but it will take the stars lining up for us. Stranger things have happened, all we can do is hope its all coming together at the right time, as of today, we are playing our best football, right now at the right time, just don't know if it will be enough. I do know that you can't count this bunch out, they will scrap with anybody, never say die.   "GO COLTS"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They've already shown the brackets. We go straight to New England with a win over Baltimore. I expect us to beat Baltimore to be absolutely honest with you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They've already shown the brackets. We go straight to New England with a win over Baltimore. I expect us to beat Baltimore to be absolutely honest with you.

 

The lowest seeded team remaining after the wildcard round goes to Denver.  So if Texans and Colts win, Colts go to Denver.  If Bengals and Colts win, Colts go to NE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The lowest seeded team remaining after the wildcard round goes to Denver.  So if Texans and Colts win, Colts go to Denver.  If Bengals and Colts win, Colts go to NE.

I didn't hear anything thing like that when they were breaking down the brackets on ESPN. From what I saw they showed the brackets and who the winner of each wildcard game would play. They showed Baltimore vs. Indy with New England right next to it. Meaning that whoever won that game would play New England. I'll double check, but I didn't hear them mention anything else about seeding determining who would go where after the Wildcard games were over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Actually, if I'm being totally honest here, I'd make NFL referees a permanent 12 month position with great benefits & a nice salary vs the temporary occupation it is now.    My reasoning is simple: If you compensate people well so that they can devote their entire time perfecting & improving their craft, they tend to excel at it & negate their mistakes over time.    Plus, with all the new rules/modifications that get tweaked every yr, it would be a wise move to validate to your referee crews that you value their attention to detail through their pocket book. When you pay people well, they strive to make their bosses look good. 
    • Pre-game & halftime interviews with both head coaches. Yeah I know, they are not an NFL rule per say unless you wanna count them as a CBA mandate to make themselves available to journalists during a game.    I just have never really gotten anything meaningful over these reporter/coach interactions. 90% of the remarks are tired cliches & even if you missed part of the game; nobody ever looks online to say hear what Erin Andrews asked a coach at halftime. 
    • I agree with taking away the taunting rule tool because it's just another version of smack talking live. If you wanna ban the throat slashing gesture, the pretend pistol firing gesture, or the archery firing motion fine; but everything else is fair game.   It's your job to shut your adversary up by scoring TDs or crippling their ground game on defense on 3rd down. And why is the league allowed to promote their shield & jerseys for profit but players can't engage in individual expressions of self promotion either? Seems highly hypocritical to me Mr. Commissioner. Just saying. 
    • I kind of agree with this reverting back I mean. This idea that both sides get an opportunity to touch the ball on offense is overrated to me. Yeah I know, the coin toss by a ref was given excessive weight to a random element of chance, but still. I liked it when the first score in OT even a FG could win the darn game. It was a rush man. The arbitrariness of it all in overtime so many things coaches had no control over: heads or tails on the toss, hearing what player captains declared on the field incorrectly before the toss itself; & life in general isn't fair anyway. Why should both teams get the ball in OT anyway? It gives almost voodoo magic mystique to how the coin lands.    Plus, a lot of players can get injured playing an extra quarter of football. They're tired, exhausted, & say a coach is on the hot seat by their owner & needs to make the playoffs to retain their job...And then wham the team looses their star WR or DB? Crap.    Not only that. Field Goals are crisp, clean, & the guys can get a shower faster & clean up sooner for post game interviews too.    Last but not least, one of the reasons I refuse to watch baseball is that the games take too long to finally conclude & the longer games play out the more it interferes with TV programming & sleeping habits of some fans too. Length isn't always an asset in broadcasting as producers or consumers overall. 
    •   That would be my pick too. I don't think any other team has underachieved as much in the past few years. They have questionmarks at LB, S, OL and HC, along with Rivers late game meltdowns but if Lynn proves out to be at least average coach, I think they are fairly serious threat. That's one stacked division they play in though and rough schedule.
  • Welcome New Members

  • Members

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.