Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Why are we so much better at home?


oldunclemark

Recommended Posts

i only saw manning play once in his years here at indy. it was a slow low scoring game versus the titans. in the 4th quarter our offense finally started making some plays and the crowd started to roar. manning rushed up to the line and starting the arm flailing to silence the crowd.

 

you see and hear about it on tv, but until you witness first hand 60,000 people going completely silent at once, you just don't understand it. simply amazing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The majority of the teams play better at home.  Crowd has a lot to do with charging the players batteries, the we have to defend our house mentality goes into effect, and the players get to eat and sleep at home (more normal routine)....just a cpl of my thoughts.

But Blue Man...true..werent we 0-8 on the road last year...

....but not THIS MUCH better..

NE and Denver are good at home but they're good on the road, too..

How about the Giants and Dallas? Teams like Pittsburgh and Cincinatti are about the same, arent they?

Seattle has a big home field edge..but that team is built nothing like the Colts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right that we aren't really that young on defense, but you do have a new scheme with a lot of players that are square pegs trying to fit in round holes.  They are also a defense that is put into tough situations (especially on the road) when the very young offense makes mistakes (more turnovers, more inability to sustain drives giving the D rest).  They always say the hardest thing to do in the NFL is learning to win on the road consistently.  

We dont really have that young a team defensively...

7-1 at home and 4-4 on the road..?

...wins over GB and Houston at home.....a road loss to the Jets?

Experince. The dome?


..any thoughts...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But Blue Man...true..werent we 0-8 on the road last year...

....but not THIS MUCH better..

NE and Denver are good at home but they're good on the road, too..

How about the Giants and Dallas? Teams like Pittsburgh and Cincinatti are about the same, arent they?

Seattle has a big home field edge..but that team is built nothing like the Colts

 

 

But Blue Man...true..werent we 0-8 on the road last year...

....but not THIS MUCH better..

NE and Denver are good at home but they're good on the road, too..

How about the Giants and Dallas? Teams like Pittsburgh and Cincinatti are about the same, arent they?

Seattle has a big home field edge..but that team is built nothing like the Colts

It wouldn't let me multi quote.  The good teams find a way to win on the road.  We are a team that is learning what it takes to win on the road.  A young team more than others will have higher highs and lower lows.  And 3 of the 4 road losses were about as low as you could go.  It doesn't explain much but it is what it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^This. And Peyton Manning has trained the crowd at LOS to be dead silent during offensive drives which make it easier on the offense, which in turn makes it harder for opposing defenses.

I noticed Brazill had his foot on the LOS before the snap, but before the snap he stepped back, probably because a coach let him know about it. Little aspects of the game are affected, which leads to less mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Round 1 - #15 A. Xavier Worthy, WR, Texas B. Brian Thomas, WR, LSU C. Brock Bowers, TE, Georgia   Round 2 - #46  A. Edgerrin Cooper, LB, Texas A&M B. Marshall Kneeland, DE, Western Michigan C. Jaden Hicks, S, Washington State   Round 3 - #82 A. Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon B. Darius Robinson, DE/DT, Missouri C. Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State   Round 4 - #117 A. Jalyx Hunt, DE, Houston Christian B. Mason McCormick, OG, South Dakota State C. Malik Washington, WR, Virginia   Round 5 - #151 A. Beaux Limmer, OC, Arkansas B. Tanor Bortolini, OC, Wisconsin C. Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville   Round 6 - #191 A. Decamerion Richardson, CB, Mississippi State B. Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, Toronto C. Nick Gargiulo, OC, South Carolina   Round 7 - #234 A. Millard Bradford, SS, TCU B. Mark Perry, FS, TCU C. Dalton Tucker, OG, Marshall   BONUS: Will the Colts trade the #15 pick this year?  A: Yes, they will trade back.  
    • Yeah... Richardson needs players who can separate and who can get open deep. IMO "give the inaccurate QB a contested catch receiver with large catch radius" is one of the tropes that hasn't proven to work well. Contested catches have about 50-55% success rate even with the best of contested catch receivers and with relatively accurate QBs... now if you think AR's accuracy is not good, drop that rate even more. The best way to give a relatively inaccurate QB better chance to complete passes is to give him a WR who separates and and who is open so the QB would have more of a margin for error to throw the ball a little behind or ahead or a little higher or lower than ideal. (we are not talking about uncatchable balls here... those will be uncatchable for anyone really). In that regard, one thing I would agree about is - we need WRs who have good hands and have good ball skills.   And this is ignoring that AR has indeed been pretty good with his accuracy on passes at intermediate and long range. His biggest problem coming into the league was the short stuff and he was already showing improvements in that deparment before he got injured.    And Worthy is the WR who created the most separation from anybody in this draft :   
    • Richardson  accuracy  on deep balls is his strength.  Hence why you pair an elite deep threat in worthy.
    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
  • Members

    • stitches

      stitches 19,240

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ShuteAt168

      ShuteAt168 956

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 6

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rob220

      rob220 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...