Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

jvan1973

350 on the ground

Recommended Posts

Good thing is, last time we gave up that many yards we buckled up the d and won the an that year!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Linebackers and D Line appeared tp be flowing in the same direction on some play which left huge cut back running lanes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Before today, has any team ever given up 350 yards rushing and won?

That's insane, shows how bad Brady Quinn is. I can only imagine if the Colts rushed for 350 yards we would've blown them out and scored 50 points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And how many TDs did those 350 yards turn into?

Brady Quinn is so bad, he can lose a game his running backs won

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Colts allowed 376 on the ground, and barely lost.

 

If this is a new record, allowing the most rushing yards and winning, then that's a record not to be proud of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not excuse able but the whole front line was out plus Conner out and it sounds like freeman was extremely limited. Injuries to the front seven caught up to them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Brady Quinn is so bad, he can lose a game his running backs won

 

Isn't it amazing that he keeps getting jobs?  He must hold one mean clipboard.

 

BTW, Charles had 165 against the Browns a few weeks ago and they lost by 23.  Not sure that means anything other than it's not how many yards you get, unless a bunch of them end past the goal line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Colts allowed 376 on the ground, and barely lost.

 

If this is a new record, allowing the most rushing yards and winning, then that's a record not to be proud of.

 

It was 375, and we lost 44-17.

 

I can't imagine anyone has given up more in a win, particularly in regulation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankfully POINTS determine ballgames and not yards. I could have cared less if they ran for a 1000 yards. The defense was brick-solid in the redzone, but horrendous between the 20's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thankfully POINTS determine ballgames and not yards. I could have cared less if they ran for a 1000 yards. The defense was brick-solid in the redzone, but horrendous between the 20's.

Do ya really think we would have have been brick solid in the redzone if that would have been Tom Brady at QB or even Flacco (since we will likely play the Ravens in the WC). I definitly care how many yards we give up because that is an indicator our defense is not that good and good offenses will exploit it. Went with the dont break strategy and we eventually broke come playoff time UNTIL our defense came up BIG and led us to our SB win in 06

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Something I've noticed about our philosophy is that we just completely ignore their strengths. Calvin Johnson, possibly best receiver in the NFL? Psh, no need for double teams, Vaughn's got this. 12 catches, 176 yards--Colts win the game anyways. Same thing here. They can go average a freaking 8 ypc, but that didn't translate into a win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do ya really think we would have have been brick solid in the redzone if that would have been Tom Brady at QB or even Flacco (since we will likely play the Ravens in the WC). I definitly care how many yards we give up because that is an indicator our defense is not that good and good offenses will exploit it. Went with the dont break strategy and we eventually broke come playoff time UNTIL our defense came up BIG and led us to our SB win in 06

When you can show me a game where a team won because they had more yards than the other team and yards were the determining factor I will give "yards" more credence.

My post was directly related to today's game and yes they were solid today in the redzone and horrible between the 20's. Brady probably would have been better, and Flacco isn't much of a step up from Brady Quinn in my opinion, but again this has nothing to do with my original post about "today's" game.

I think you're trying to decipher from my post that you think I'm saying the defense was good, which they weren't, BUT they were good enough to keep the Chiefs to 13 points and that's what matters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We were lucky to be playing KC today any decent team blows us out of the water today. We are really hurting in the front seven of our starters in the front seven the only two healthy at the moment are Freeney and Mathis and they are not known for run stopping. We need Johnson, Redding, Conner, and Freeman to get healthy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thankfully POINTS determine ballgames and not yards. I could have cared less if they ran for a 1000 yards.

Bill Polian approves this message.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mack regressed because he only got 20 yards instead of scoring.  Just lol.
    • I doubt they blitz very much.  That front 7 should keep enough pressure on to keep them from having to do that.  I see what you're saying though.  LOL
    •   First,  it's NOT one game.....     the O-line was outstanding the last 6-7 games of 2016.   Second,  the line wasn't the issue why we lost Monday night.      The young quarterback was.     Brissett is a talented kid,   but he's got a lot to learn as all young quarterbacks do.        The blitzes that came in the 2nd half are blitzes that Luck can handle....    but most young quarterbacks struggle with them.      Once the offense couldn't move the ball,  we were screwed.     You can only keep the defense on the field for so long before bad things start to happen.   Look.....    you're likely going to get your wish after this season.     Pagano will get fired.    Most of the staff will likely go with him.       Are you going to throw a fit each week we melt down?       Because you'll be doing a lot of it.     And what's the point?    The staff will soon be gone,  maybe not as fast as you'd like,   but they'll be gone.      And a new staff will come in and hopefully that will lead to much, much better football.     It's just a matter of time...    
    •   You can't sidestep this problem.  He started the sitting/kneeling thing and so he's the face and the symbol of it.  People would feel that by signing him you are endorsing his protest, which is going to cost you fans.  That's just the reality of it.   He is grasping at straws, he's hurt either emotionally or financially by the fact that he's not playing.  A couple weeks ago he promised that he would stand for the anthem if he was signed.  Now he's doing this.     But he can't go back now.  That's just the way he is.  He stood up for something and now he's going to pay for it.  It's not any different with anyone else.  Taking a stand on something controversial, no matter how right or wrong you are can cost you.  
  • Members

    • achcolts

      achcolts 225

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DarkHorse

      DarkHorse 46

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,073

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bananabucket

      bananabucket 626

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jradMT

      jradMT 32

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fisticuffs111

      Fisticuffs111 374

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • That Guy

      That Guy 584

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dgambill

      dgambill 3,129

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BPindy

      BPindy 329

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash7

      Flash7 1,431

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active: