Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

GoColtsGo5150

Personal Scouting

35 posts in this topic

I have had a look at a few individual videos for the players ( entering the draft)  in the positions that we need the most ( which include OL,NT, OLB and SS).

 

OL (Most important)- when it came to the Oline, I looked at the interior linemen rather than the tackles etc. specifically: Chance Warmack and Johnathan Cooper. To me in pass blocking, they both seemed to be able to create time, but Cooper seemed to be the better of the two because to me, he seemed more dominant and physical against the man he was blocking. With running however, Warmack to me was able to open a reasonable amount of gaps for Lacy and the other Bama RBs. Overall would rather go with Warmack because it seems that he has the larger upside and in a sense, more the safer option.

 

NT (2nd)-  with NT's the people I looked at were mainly Jesse Williams, Kwann Short and Sylvester Williams. They all seemed to be good fits for our system but Shorts and Sylvester seemed to show a lot of power and pressure to the QB than Jesse but jesse to me seems better at clogging the gaps and stopping the run. If we had to picked, it should be Sylvester because it seems he will be able to do the most out of the 3 and it looks like Jesse might be taken quite early in the draft. Also Joe Vellano looks like low risk high reward sort of player if we can get him as a FA or a really late pick.

 

OLB (least important)- I don't feel this is really a huge position of need but it looks like we need to get them sooner rather than later. I only focused on Chase Thomas and Sean Porter. Thomas at times seemed to be a bit complacent in terms going after the ball carrier but he can certainly cause pressure and he looked very good at shedding blocks.  Porter was able to shed blocks like Thomas but he looked a bit inconsistent when tackling ( sometimes missed but sometimes hard and for a loss.) Of the 2, I'd go with Thomas, because he looks like he will be able to get the RB or QB more effective than Porter.

 

SS(3rd) - I looked at a lot of SS's as in a way, they had the most depth in the draft. When it came to tackling, Elam impressed me a lot, when he hit the ball carrier, a lot of force went into those hits but I don't see us getting him with him going so high.TJ McDonald looked good stopping the run and in some mocks he's still in the 2nd round, perhaps if he drops lower? also Robert Lester seems like an all round SS ( good at coverage, able to shed blocks and a solid tackler) to me Lester seems the most practical but definitely would like to get either of the other 2 if we have a chance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gotta look at CBs dude. No position is more important for us this offseason.

Fair game buddy, but maybe in FA or get a late round CB ( desmond trufant,leon mcfadden, tyrannmathieu perhaps?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We ALREADY have CB`s that might develope.

We MUST get two Quality OL starters and a Pass Rusher.

Vontea Leach is the only Corner we have thats respectable and its not a smart strategy to not draft at a position or not one up in FA(Tracey Porter if by wild chance he becomes available) just because we have guys "that might develop right the guys that might develop have looked awful more often then not

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Vontea Leach is the only Corner we have thats respectable and its not a smart strategy to not draft at a position or not one up in FA(Tracey Porter if by wild chance he becomes available) just because we have guys "that might develop right the guys that might develop have looked awful more often then not

Vontae Leach!?! lol. I think you meant Davis. (funny image of 6'0" 260lb fullback playing CB kinda made my day)

 

We do need a CB or two. Butler has been ok but Cassius Vaughn is flat out brutal. I'm hoping for a CB in FA or draft.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Vontae Leach!?! lol. I think you meant Davis. (funny image of 6'0" 260lb fullback playing CB kinda made my day)

 

We do need a CB or two. Butler has been ok but Cassius Vaughn is flat out brutal. I'm hoping for a CB in FA or draft.

lol meant Davis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gotta look at CBs dude. No position is more important for us this offseason.

 

Have you seen how many times Luck has been hit this year?

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah we definitely need a compliment to Davis, I'd prefer we get OLinemen through Free Agency because seasoned Olinemen have more value than rookies and if we get a 27 year old OLineman with about 5 years in the league he'll still last for another 5 years

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OLB isn't a huge need? pressure on the qb is the most important thing a defense can do...in case you havn't noticed the colts don't do it very well....freeney has one foot out the door and mathis is on the wrong side of 40.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thoughts on Vaccaro?

Like him but not spending a 1st on him if he is there

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OLB isn't a huge need? pressure on the qb is the most important thing a defense can do...in case you havn't noticed the colts don't do it very well....freeney has one foot out the door and mathis is on the wrong side of 40.

Actually right side of 40 but wrong side of 30 :thmup: He is gonna be 32 February 26th

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Have you seen how many times Luck has been hit this year?

 

There's a lot that goes into it, but I really only feel we need new starters at two spots; RT and RG. Both spots I'd prefer to be fixed in Free Agency rather than the crapshoot that is the draft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There's a lot that goes into it, but I really only feel we need new starters at two spots; RT and RG. Both spots I'd prefer to be fixed in Free Agency rather than the crapshoot that is the draft.

 

That is fine and dandy but you said that CB's were the biggest offseason need and I would say that is categorically wrong.  Keeping the franchise QB out of harms way is far and away the most important thing to come out of the 2013 offseason.  Easily.  Not even close.  How that is accomplished, be it through the draft, free agency or both is irrelevant as long as it is done.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can make arguments for the O line and the Secondary.

I'd draft talent in the secondary early, because at that position a guy can be a game one starter.

The Colts really need a Center and a Right Tackle, not to say that every job shouldn't be open aside from Costanzo's spot.

It'll be interesting to see how that plays out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Putting pressure on the other team's QB is always top priority.  The Giants didn't need JPP but they grabbed him and it's a good thing they did.  Fix the Oline in free agency if we have to, but you don't ever pass up the next Freeney, Ware, etc....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You can make arguments for the O line and the Secondary.

I'd draft talent in the secondary early, because at that position a guy can be a game one starter.

The Colts really need a Center and a Right Tackle, not to say that every job shouldn't be open aside from Costanzo's spot.

It'll be interesting to see how that plays out.

 

You don't think a rookie can start on the offensive line in game one?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You don't think a rookie can start on the offensive line in game one?

Sure, but I don't see it being better in the short term than bringing in quality veteran's. The key here is who's on the FA market and where Grigson ends up picking.

I think the secondary is an area where rookies with raw athletic ability would be less of a liability than a first rounder OL pick.

I really don't have a clue how this will shake out and I'm not going to pretend to know best.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The first round pick will be contingent on what we do in free agency......it gets no simpler than that.

 

Not necessarily true at all.  Most teams use the BPA theory of drafting and the Colts are certainly in that category.  As evidence, I give you their 2012 2nd and 3rd round draft picks.   Free agency is used so that teams can stay true to their draft boards, which means if the BPA on the board is an OT and they already spent $$ in free agency on the line, they will take the tackle. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sure, but I don't see it being better in the short term than bringing in quality veteran's. The key here is who's on the FA market and where Grigson ends up picking.

I think the secondary is an area where rookies with raw athletic ability would be less of a liability than a first rounder OL pick.

I really don't have a clue how this will shake out and I'm not going to pretend to know best.

I don't have a clue how it will shake out either but I can definitively tell you that the league is full of offensive linemen who started day one as a rookie.  If they are better than the alternative, they play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not necessarily true at all.  Most teams use the BPA theory of drafting and the Colts are certainly in that category.  As evidence, I give you their 2012 2nd and 3rd round draft picks.   Free agency is used so that teams can stay true to their draft boards, which means if the BPA on the board is an OT and they already spent $$ in free agency on the line, they will take the tackle. 

BPA usually is the case for the first round after that its a bit more strategic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BPA usually is the case for the first round after that its a bit more strategic

 

Did you miss the part I mentioned above?  The Colts drafted TE's with their 2nd & 3rd round picks.  Doesn't that scream BPA?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did you miss the part I mentioned above?  The Colts drafted TE's with their 2nd & 3rd round picks.  Doesn't that scream BPA?

No...we had no TE's...................................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No...we had no TE's...................................

 

So a team full of holes elects to spend their 3rd rounder on a TE even though they already had spent their 2nd round pick on a TE as well and that somehow does not represent a BPA philosophy.  In other words, they bypassed other positions of need and players rated ahead of Allen so because they had no TE's?  OK - that makes sense.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did you miss the part I mentioned above?  The Colts drafted TE's with their 2nd & 3rd round picks.  Doesn't that scream BPA?

Nope there was better players available in the second-Janoris Jenkins for one who was by most considered a 1st round pick and considered by some the best Corner on the board, They went with Coby and his familiarity with Luck instead, we got the two best Tight Ends available out of it though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nope there was better players available in the second-Janoris Jenkins for one who was by most considered a 1st round pick and considered by some the best Corner on the board, They went with Coby and his familiarity with Luck instead, we got the two best Tight Ends available out of it though

 

Jenkins was a completely different situation.  Completely different.  There were teams who took him off their board altogether because of his off the field issues.  And those that didn't certainly dropped him down their board. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jenkins was a completely different situation.  Completely different.  There were teams who took him off their board altogether because of hisskills like his are  off the field issues.  And those that didn't certainly dropped him down their board. 

Yes but he did not drop to far, talented Corners with skills like his are hard to find. Im just pointing out that there were higher rated players available (Better was probably a bad term to use when you consider that they play to completely different positions thereby making the two really uncomparable from a whos better then who talent perspective).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes but he did not drop to far, talented Corners with skills like his are hard to find. Im just pointing out that there were higher rated players available (Better was probably a bad term to use when you consider that they play to completely different positions thereby making the two really uncomparable from a whos better then who talent perspective).

 

to say that there were higher rated players available, you need access to the Colts board.  Maybe on Kiper's board there were but that means nothing to NFL GM's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

. Actually YES, as we HAD a TE Fleenor already and blocking TE`s can likely be found in the late rounds or FA so I would Totally agree that Dwayne Allen was clearly the BPA. JMO

I would expect Grigson to try to fix the O-Line (2 Quality Starters) and pass rush through FA and the 1st pick.

Will there be a Solid O-Lineman there late in the 3rd Rd.? IFFY! A Solid pass rusher there? MORE Iffy!

/

I would expect that 3rd Rd pick to be a CB, RB, or OLB. BPA! Same with the 4th Rd.

WE really need another explosive RB to complement Ballard, and for depth. Not saying he will trade up but I don`t think Grigson will risk Hopeing to hit on another late rounder. RB is too important. Maybe a FA RB!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
. Actually YES, as we HAD a TE Fleenor already and blocking TE`s can likely be found in the late rounds or FA so I would Totally agree that Dwayne Allen was clearly the BPA. JMO

I would expect Grigson to try to fix the O-Line (2 Quality Starters) and pass rush through FA and the 1st pick.

Will there be a Solid O-Lineman there late in the 3rd Rd.? IFFY! A Solid pass rusher there? MORE Iffy!

/

I would expect that 3rd Rd pick to be a CB, RB, or OLB. BPA! Same with the 4th Rd.

WE really need another explosive RB to complement Ballard, and for depth. Not saying he will trade up but I don`t think Grigson will risk Hopeing to hit on another late rounder. RB is too important. Maybe a FA RB!

Brown is very explosive with an O Line that can block

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Actually, if I'm being totally honest here, I'd make NFL referees a permanent 12 month position with great benefits & a nice salary vs the temporary occupation it is now.    My reasoning is simple: If you compensate people well so that they can devote their entire time perfecting & improving their craft, they tend to excel at it & negate their mistakes over time.    Plus, with all the new rules/modifications that get tweaked every yr, it would be a wise move to validate to your referee crews that you value their attention to detail through their pocket book. When you pay people well, they strive to make their bosses look good. 
    • Pre-game & halftime interviews with both head coaches. Yeah I know, they are not an NFL rule per say unless you wanna count them as a CBA mandate to make themselves available to journalists during a game.    I just have never really gotten anything meaningful over these reporter/coach interactions. 90% of the remarks are tired cliches & even if you missed part of the game; nobody ever looks online to say hear what Erin Andrews asked a coach at halftime. 
    • I agree with taking away the taunting rule tool because it's just another version of smack talking live. If you wanna ban the throat slashing gesture, the pretend pistol firing gesture, or the archery firing motion fine; but everything else is fair game.   It's your job to shut your adversary up by scoring TDs or crippling their ground game on defense on 3rd down. And why is the league allowed to promote their shield & jerseys for profit but players can't engage in individual expressions of self promotion either? Seems highly hypocritical to me Mr. Commissioner. Just saying. 
    • I kind of agree with this reverting back I mean. This idea that both sides get an opportunity to touch the ball on offense is overrated to me. Yeah I know, the coin toss by a ref was given excessive weight to a random element of chance, but still. I liked it when the first score in OT even a FG could win the darn game. It was a rush man. The arbitrariness of it all in overtime so many things coaches had no control over: heads or tails on the toss, hearing what player captains declared on the field incorrectly before the toss itself; & life in general isn't fair anyway. Why should both teams get the ball in OT anyway? It gives almost voodoo magic mystique to how the coin lands.    Plus, a lot of players can get injured playing an extra quarter of football. They're tired, exhausted, & say a coach is on the hot seat by their owner & needs to make the playoffs to retain their job...And then wham the team looses their star WR or DB? Crap.    Not only that. Field Goals are crisp, clean, & the guys can get a shower faster & clean up sooner for post game interviews too.    Last but not least, one of the reasons I refuse to watch baseball is that the games take too long to finally conclude & the longer games play out the more it interferes with TV programming & sleeping habits of some fans too. Length isn't always an asset in broadcasting as producers or consumers overall. 
    •   That would be my pick too. I don't think any other team has underachieved as much in the past few years. They have questionmarks at LB, S, OL and HC, along with Rivers late game meltdowns but if Lynn proves out to be at least average coach, I think they are fairly serious threat. That's one stacked division they play in though and rough schedule.
  • Welcome New Members

  • Members

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.