Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

chad72

NFL pondering expansion of playoffs

48 posts in this topic

Why don't they just stop looking/pondering into changing so much. Sigh.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all for it.

Get rid of the bye week all together move it to 16 teams. Since the high schools are finished playing there is no worry about playing on a Friday night.

8 games in wild card weekend

1 on Friday

3 on saturday

3 on sunday

1 on Monday

or

2 on Friday

3 on Sat

3 on Sun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No....

Although... maybe best out of three... wins.... but that would be impossible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all for it.

Get rid of the bye week all together move it to 16 teams. Since the high schools are finished playing there is no worry about playing on a Friday night.

8 games in wild card weekend

1 on Friday

3 on saturday

3 on sunday

1 on Monday

or

2 on Friday

3 on Sat

3 on Sun

That is half the league, FJC. It is like the NBA then.

What is the reward for getting the best 2 records then?

I'd be fine with 14 teams, to be honest because 1 and only 1 team deserves the bye, the best one in the conference.

So, we will have 6 games on wild card weekend, 3 on Saturday, 3 on Sunday with 2 teams on bye.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like a way to get more money for the league while potentially damaging the integrity of the game by likely rewarding 500 or slightly worse teams into the playoffs on a fairly regular basis and leaving them with fairly high draft pick as well,

Thata boy Goodell keep trying to add to your ridiculous reign of foolishness as Commish :thmup::facepalm:

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It better not happen. I mean seriously, my interest in this sport is gonna dive like it has with the NBA if they mess with too much. "Ponder" all you want but please stop meddling with a good thing IMO.

I mean yeah lets let more crap in the playoffs even if they finish with 7 or 8 wins. With this way we could get this years Jets in somehow which would probably make the league squeal like little girls since it's a NY team. Or even everyone's favorite the Saints could be alive and kicking to get into the playoffs.

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The flip side of staying at 6 is there will be lots of occasions where teams with 10+ wins will be left out of the playoffs (Bucs and Giants in 2010). So expanding it to 7 may not be as bad. This is the reason why:

Expanding it to 7 in each conference ensures only 1 team is privileged with the bye week because there is truly only 1 homefield advantage throughout the playoffs. It will still be 14 out of 32 teams that would make it 43% of the teams.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is half the league, FJC. It is like the NBA then.

What is the reward for getting the best 2 records then?

I'd be fine with 14 teams, to be honest because 1 and only 1 team deserves the bye, the best one in the conference.

So, we will have 6 games on wild card weekend, 3 on Saturday, 3 on Sunday with 2 teams on bye.

That's just how much I detest the bye week.

I can promise you there would be 1 & 2 seeds taking opening round losses...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Monetary reasons, pure and simple. I love this league, but if there is a way they can make money, they will do it without regard to integrity of the game, player safety, and fan reaction. They want to put an NFL team in Europe....nuff said.

36g1g2.jpg

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If this keeps up, its going to end up like the NHL...where almost every team is in the playoffs, and the regular season doesn't really matter. I didn't like the WC when it first came out, (I'm still from the old school where I think the only teams that should be in the playoffs are the division winners). The two wild card spots did make more games important, and that was and is good for football, but I feel that the way the system is right now is working just fine, and should not be tampered with. This way, a team with a better record than a division winner in a weak conference, really doesn't get penalized for having a good regular season. It may happen occasionally, but its a lot better than having 14-16 teams in the playoffs..

Its not perfect by any means, but adding more playoff teams will water down the league. Jules said it perfectly in her post ..."I mean yeah lets let more crap in the playoffs even if they finish with 7 or 8 wins. With this way we could get this years Jets in somehow which would probably make the league squeal like little girls since it's a NY team. Or even everyone's favorite the Saints could be alive and kicking to get into the playoffs."

Teams should have to earn their way in...and 6-10, 7-9, and 8-8 (unless you win your division), shouldn't even be considered for the playoffs..

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

roger goodell is the dumbest commish in all of sports

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like the idea at first read.

I understand, that Goodell would deliver more football to fans (and more income from marketing and broadcast to the League), but IMO it would decrease the quality.

Playoffs could be extended by deciding wild card games in 2 games (1 home, 1 away, in case of 1-1 a third game @ tiebreaker's home-field) and eliminating bye week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bad idea, but it will generate money so i'm sure it will happen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like this idea at all. The thing about the NFL that's so appealing is the importance of every game. If half the teams in the league make the playoffs, my fear is that we'll see the same mentality in the NBA/NHL/MLB, where teams just sort of coast through the regular season and only try hard enough to make the playoffs.

It's bad enough that we usually see at least one .500 team come in as a wildcard. Can you imagine how much it would suck for the sport if a 7-9 team made it in and somehow pulled off an improbable Super Bowl run? Having .500 teams qualify for the post season is bad enough... I'd prefer to see the NFL leave this as-is. Just my opinion.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bill polian just made a good case for expanding the playoff to 14 teams on espn radio.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bill polian just made a good case for expanding the playoff to 14 teams on espn radio.

Its actually an obvious idea..

2 teams get bye weeks and all you would do is eliminate the byes....

More money for TV...more for owners..and (at the next CBA negotiations) more for players..

It will happen..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Monetary reasons, pure and simple. I love this league, but if there is a way they can make money, they will do it without regard to integrity of the game, player safety, and fan reaction. They want to put an NFL team in Europe....nuff said.

36g1g2.jpg

what business doesn't try to make more money?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The flip side of staying at 6 is there will be lots of occasions where teams with 10+ wins will be left out of the playoffs (Bucs and Giants in 2010). So expanding it to 7 may not be as bad. This is the reason why:

Expanding it to 7 in each conference ensures only 1 team is privileged with the bye week because there is truly only 1 homefield advantage throughout the playoffs. It will still be 14 out of 32 teams that would make it 43% of the teams.

I think its a good idea....

..and player safety has nothing to do with it,...a 12-team playoff and a 14-team playoff takes the same amount of time.

..and only 2 teams are playing one more game...

players have to stop whining about playing more....they all want to get paid more..but they say playing is too dangerous.

More games means more jobs

Either you do want to play in the NFL or you dont...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an idea that fans are either going to be for or against.

PFT has a poll up at 71% want no change.

13% want 14 teams

16% want 16 teams

I didn't see similar polls on ESPN.com or NFL.com.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like a way to get more money for the league while potentially damaging the integrity of the game by likely rewarding 500 or slightly worse teams into the playoffs on a fairly regular basis and leaving them with fairly high draft pick as well,

Thata boy Goodell keep trying to add to your ridiculous reign of foolishness as Commish :thmup::facepalm:

The intergrity of a game where union ballplayers in New Orleans are encouraged by their coaches to pay 'hit money' to disable other union ballplayers...?

That game? That integrity?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like a way to get more money for the league while potentially damaging the integrity of the game by likely rewarding 500 or slightly worse teams into the playoffs on a fairly regular basis and leaving them with fairly high draft pick as well,

Thata boy Goodell keep trying to add to your ridiculous reign of foolishness as Commish :thmup::facepalm:

Let's just look at the last 5 years to see what teams would be added to the playoffs.

Expanding to 14 teams

2011 NFC Chicago 8-8 & AFC Tennessee 9-7

2010 NFC NY Giants 10-6 & AFC San Diego 9-7

2009 NFC Atlanta 9-7 & AFC Houston 9-7

2008 NFC Tampa Bay 9-7 & AFC New England 11-5

2007 NFC Minnesota 8-8 & AFC Cleveland 10-6

Exapanding to 16 teams(the teams listed above and one additional team from each conference

2011 NFC Arizona 8-8 & AFC Jets 8-8

2010 NFC Tampa Bay 10-6 & AFC Jacksonville 8-8

2009 NFC Carolina 8-8 & AFC Pittsburgh 9-7

2008 NFC Dallas 9-7 & AFC Jets 9-7

2007 NFC Philadelphia 8-8 & AFC Houston 8-8

Expanding to 14 teams would have added:

1 11-5 team

2 10-6 teams

5 9-7 teams

2 8-8 teams

Expanding to 16 teams would have added

1 11-5 team

3 10-6 teams

8 9-7 teams

8 8-8 teams

Like I said in a previous post, I can promise you some of these teams would have advanced and who knows... One or more might even be wearing a ring.

If you go back to 2010, Seattle wins a weak west with a 7-9 record, while 2 10-6 teams are sitting at home in the NFC. That's how the cards fell. That 7-9 team surprisingly beat the defending Super Bowl Champions. It's the playoffs anything can happen. To me there is nothing wrong with more playoff games.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's good stuff, FJC.....

..as long as no sub. 500s were added...more playoff games are a good thing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why don't they just stop looking/pondering into changing so much. Sigh.

This is my thoughts exactly. The NFL is more popular than its ever been, it doesn't need change rightnow. It's doesn't need more teams, more playoff seeds, or more games.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seriously, HALF THE LEAGUE?

Let's just let every team in to the playoffs.

Oh, while we're at it, expand the regular season to 32 games. We're concerned about money player safety, but it's the fans that matter most.

I propose a new rule, Goodell can't propose any more changes for a minimum of five seasons and needs to LEAVE SUCH A BELOVED SPORT THE HECK ALONE.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you go back to 2010, Seattle wins a weak west with a 7-9 record, while 2 10-6 teams are sitting at home in the NFC. That's how the cards fell. That 7-9 team surprisingly beat the defending Super Bowl Champions. It's the playoffs anything can happen. To me there is nothing wrong with more playoff games.

can't remember the year sandy eggo won their division at 8-8. the wild card colts had to go there and lost :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

can't remember the year sandy eggo won their division at 8-8. the wild card colts had to go there and lost :(

Anomalies happen(doesn't that sound like a t-shirt/bumper sticker) :) ... They won their division. There has to be some form of reward for that... I would have liked to play that game in Indy, but so be it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anomalies happen(doesn't that sound like a t-shirt/bumper sticker) :) ... They won their division. There has to be some form of reward for that... I would have liked to play that game in Indy, but so be it.

i totally agree. it makes winning the division the primary goal in the regular season, and the game is better for it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

looking at FJC's post i wouldn't mind 14 team playoff, but 16 kinda sucks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The one thing you know about sports leagues is that they never know when to leave well enough alone. The NFL is special because there are so few games that every single one is a pressure filled event. The more teams you allow in the playoffs, the less the regular season games mean. With 16 they would suddenly be very close to a situation where any decent team would assume they are making the playoffs if they just show up for half their games. The NBA is so ridiculous that you wonder if it might be better just to extend the playoffs one more round, and turn the whole thing into a best of 7 knockoff tournament. The regular season is largely a dull joke, with the only excitement being late season fights for the 8th seed. Do we really need to take a step closer to that?

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or put another way, right now the AFC is largely about exciting wars on a couple of fronts: the Colts, Bengals and Steelers vying for two playoff spots, and the division leaders vying for byes (with a couple of less likely side stories). If the new system were in place, the Colts Bengals and Steelers would essentially all be locks for the playoffs, and the byes wouldn't exist. The "exciting stories" would be about the Bills, Dolphins, Jets, Browns Titans and Chargers all fighting for that final playoff spot. Every one of them are teams that we consider to be in the middle of failed - and in many cases embarrassing - seasons. All but one has given up more points than they've scored (some a LOT more). Virtually all are destined for a draft pick in the top half of the first round - a rare experience for a good team. Yet these are who national tv will focus on while the top teams debate resting players. Jets versus Bills - a game most would consider a joke - might be the key game of the final weekend. Is that really worth making wild-card weekend a little bit more interesting?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all for it.

Get rid of the bye week all together move it to 16 teams. Since the high schools are finished playing there is no worry about playing on a Friday night.

8 games in wild card weekend

1 on Friday

3 on saturday

3 on sunday

1 on Monday

or

2 on Friday

3 on Sat

3 on Sun

I can understand you wouldn't mind seeing more football but IMO the playoffs need to stay more exclusive, more of a challenging goal. I don't ever wanna see a .500 team making the playoffs.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Roger Goodell proving once again he is the worst commissioner ever.

They will make sure they get their 34 team expansion with L.A. and another city, and looks like they are already looking ahead, might as well roll out the 18 game season too. All they care about is dolla dolla bill y'all. Stack a dolla, make it go cha-ching! $$$$$$$$$$$

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Three words describes my feelings about expanding the playoffs. NO! NO! NO! U expand it then u start letting in mediocre teams in. Why not expand the playoffs to 32 teams. Keep it at 12. They get paid to play. The fewer teams in the playoffs the better they have to play to make the playoffs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Umm...No. Leave it the way it is. I really don't want a team that's under .500 playing in the playoffs.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back in 2010 Seattle won their div & w/a 7-9 record just think if we had 16 teams in the playoffs. We might've had a .500 or worse other than the Seahawks. Make'm earn their money & a playoff spot. In case u haven't heard this is football not wussyball like Goodell is trying to make it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can understand you wouldn't mind seeing more football but IMO the playoffs need to stay more exclusive, more of a challenging goal. I don't ever wanna see a .500 team making the playoffs.

Umm...No. Leave it the way it is. I really don't want a team that's under .500 playing in the playoffs.

Basically the only way that would likely happen would be like Seattle from a couple of years ago, winning a division at 7-9. That year there were two 10-6 teams left out of the playoffs.

Since they won their division, they would have made the playoffs if they dialed it back to 4 teams per conference as long as they left it as the division champs making the playoffs.

I'm sure there could be a scenario where one could squeak in, but it would be fairly rare.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's just look at the last 5 years to see what teams would be added to the playoffs.

Expanding to 14 teams

2011 NFC Chicago 8-8 & AFC Tennessee 9-7

2010 NFC NY Giants 10-6 & AFC San Diego 9-7

2009 NFC Atlanta 9-7 & AFC Houston 9-7

2008 NFC Tampa Bay 9-7 & AFC New England 11-5

2007 NFC Minnesota 8-8 & AFC Cleveland 10-6

Exapanding to 16 teams(the teams listed above and one additional team from each conference

2011 NFC Arizona 8-8 & AFC Jets 8-8

2010 NFC Tampa Bay 10-6 & AFC Jacksonville 8-8

2009 NFC Carolina 8-8 & AFC Pittsburgh 9-7

2008 NFC Dallas 9-7 & AFC Jets 9-7

2007 NFC Philadelphia 8-8 & AFC Houston 8-8

Expanding to 14 teams would have added:

1 11-5 team

2 10-6 teams

5 9-7 teams

2 8-8 teams

Expanding to 16 teams would have added

1 11-5 team

3 10-6 teams

8 9-7 teams

8 8-8 teams

Like I said in a previous post, I can promise you some of these teams would have advanced and who knows... One or more might even be wearing a ring.

If you go back to 2010, Seattle wins a weak west with a 7-9 record, while 2 10-6 teams are sitting at home in the NFC. That's how the cards fell. That 7-9 team surprisingly beat the defending Super Bowl Champions. It's the playoffs anything can happen. To me there is nothing wrong with more playoff games.

lets expand it to 32 teams in the next 5-6 yrs. why not? Any team can beat any other team on any given day. That's why u play the game. Expanding the playoffs is totally crazy. Keep it at 12. Make them earn it. This is football not wussyball

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Posts

    • How bad was the 2013 offseason?
      Reading this recap really is frustrating when you consider the opportunities missed. The Werner pick was the killer, I remember that Dustin (correctly) at the time pointed out his lack of explosive athleticism, it does make you wonder why he was rated so highly on teams' boards. Laugh in hindsight if you will but there were mocks out there putting him in the top 5!    Holmes/Hughes/Thornton I'm a little more forgiving on as there was certainly potential there. Holmes never seemed to be 100% fit during his time here, but even then as Superman said, there was no competition really for the C job. Well aside from that dog and pony show of Grigson wanting Harrison to start...    Thornton could still be a success story, especially if the offseason fluff pieces about him slimming are credible I do think he could be very good in a more ZBS. Hughes had flashes but never lived up to his physical tools. That seems to be the overriding issue with this FO, taking players who have the physical tools but need coaching up... but we've been terrible at coaching players. Maybe that changes with the wholesale coaching changes. I do think this is the first season we get to see a true Pagano staff. There better be some improvement as we've taken players again this year that are raw and need refining (Green and Ridgeway IMO).    The FA moves I think are easy to criticise with the benefit of hindsight. Cherilus you can question given his knee condition and the amount paid to him. It smacks of a knee jerk move to try and throw money at the O-line to fix it. Same with Thomas, but I think we were very unlucky with his injuries. Again though when you look at RJF/Toler it's like we're trying to find talent through trial and error. Of course this isn't the case but it does make you question the quality of player evaluation.         
    • what happy to billings?
      Never saw this coming with Billings, like another poster said, it happens every draft. I admit that I was on the want Billings bandwagon. I will definitely keep a close eye on his play this season.   
    • Other teams drafts
      I think my assessment backs up my opinion that he has been mediocre. Posted some stats that don`t look like Pro bowl material, but I am smart enough to realize every QB that played in the 2016 PB was a replacement. 2015 22nd ranked passer with the best RB in the NFL. Enough said, good day sir!
    • Grading the current roster
      What are you talking about? He had the 4th highest made% in the league.
    • Grading the current roster
      Wow that's suprisingly accurate.
  • Topics

  • Welcome New Members

  • Members

    • CR91

      CR91 3,942

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • will426

      will426 394

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HorseFly

      HorseFly 108

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • crestmount

      crestmount 122

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ar1888

      ar1888 234

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • macho GRANDE

      macho GRANDE 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • gacker65

      gacker65 119

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chrisfarley

      chrisfarley 484

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SevaColt

      SevaColt 21

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • scousecolt

      scousecolt 78

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.