Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

SilentHill

Houston's Schedule

45 posts in this topic

http://www.houstontexans.com/team/season-schedule.html

I decided to take a look at the schedule of the Texans after that blowout last night.

I was actually very surprised by what I found.

The Texans defense is pretty stout, but let's look at the QB's they faced to get those wins.

Week 1. Ryan Tannehill = W 30-10

Week 2. Blaine Gabbert = W 27-7

Week 3 Peyton Manning = W 31-25

Week 4. Locker / Hasselbeck = W 38-14

Week 5. Mark Sanchez = W 23-17

Week 6. Aaron Rodgers = L 42-24

Week 7 Joe Flacco = W 43-13

Week 9 Ryan Fitzpatrick = W 21-9

Week 10 Cutler / Campbell = W 13-6

Week 11 Gabbert / Henne = W 43-37

Week 12 Matthew Stafford = W 34-31

Week 13 Jake Locker = W 24-10

Week 14 Tom Brady = L 42-14

I don't know, maybe it's just me but these statistics seem encouraging. The Texans have been squeaking out wins by about one score since week 10. Texans haven't really done well against really good QB's except Manning, but he was still rusty at week 3. In 3 separate games this year Texans faced the backup QB off the bench due to injury.

Maybe it's just me, but looking at this on paper, I think the Colts have a much better chance to win than I had originally thought. Now i'm not saying we are a lock to win, that is just foolish, but I think we stand a better chance than most are giving us credit for.

Anyone else find this interesting?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In 3 separate games Texans faced the back-up QB due to injury...This doesn't concern you? Oddly enough, two of those games were against divisional opponents...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is interesting, it implies their D isnt as stout as we think. I'm more concerned about our D facing their offense. Another test against a big WR. They also have a very good QB, and top 5 RB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All I know is that if they Hurt Luck...... We got a Problem.

All I know is that if they Hurt Luck...... We got a Problem.

Yeah if they do hurt Luck....

...WE got a problem

TomB.png

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Houston has struggled against pass-heavy offenses, which is why I'm not even close to writing off the Colts.

I actually think the Colts can pull off the win this week.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Houston has struggled against pass-heavy offenses, which is why I'm not even close to writing off the Colts.

I actually think the Colts can pull off the win this week.

true especially explosive pass heavy offenses like ne and greenbay if we could jump out to lead and force schaub to beat us i think we win

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We absulutely have to have Davis on Johnson 24/7. After CJ, AJ should be a little refresher haha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I expect the Texans to respond with a very good effort against the Colts. They are a good team, they have been very good for two seasons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.houstonte...n-schedule.html

I decided to take a look at the schedule of the Texans after that blowout last night.

I was actually very surprised by what I found.

The Texans defense is pretty stout, but let's look at the QB's they faced to get those wins.

Week 1. Ryan Tannehill = W 30-10

Week 2. Blaine Gabbert = W 27-7

Week 3 Peyton Manning = W 31-25

Week 4. Locker / Hasselbeck = W 38-14

Week 5. Mark Sanchez = W 23-17

Week 6. Aaron Rodgers = L 42-24

Week 7 Joe Flacco = W 43-13

Week 9 Ryan Fitzpatrick = W 21-9

Week 10 Cutler / Campbell = W 13-6

Week 11 Gabbert / Henne = W 43-37

Week 12 Matthew Stafford = W 34-31

Week 13 Jake Locker = W 24-10

Week 14 Tom Brady = L 42-14

I don't know, maybe it's just me but these statistics seem encouraging. The Texans have been squeaking out wins by about one score since week 10. Texans haven't really done well against really good QB's except Manning, but he was still rusty at week 3. In 3 separate games this year Texans faced the backup QB off the bench due to injury.

Maybe it's just me, but looking at this on paper, I think the Colts have a much better chance to win than I had originally thought. Now i'm not saying we are a lock to win, that is just foolish, but I think we stand a better chance than most are giving us credit for.

Anyone else find this interesting?

Don't find it interesting at all.

1) It is virtually the same schedule the Colts have played.

2) What they have done in the past has no bearing on how the game on Sunday will go.

3) What is relevant are match-ups and the majority of those favor Houston.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't find it interesting at all.

1) It is virtually the same schedule the Colts have played.

2) What they have done in the past has no bearing on how the game on Sunday will go.

3) What is relevant are match-ups and the majority of those favor Houston.

agree

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Put me in the agree column as well. Explain to me blocking scheme we will implement to slow down JJ Watt. Last week we basically had no answers in the first half for the Titans rush. Sometimes you just have to admit the other team is better. Houston does not want to go back to New England so the home field incentive is huge. New England destroys everyone in there house. What did the Colts do there? Lets just take the two New England contest for comparisons. Case closed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't find it interesting at all.

1) It is virtually the same schedule the Colts have played.

2) What they have done in the past has no bearing on how the game on Sunday will go.

3) What is relevant are match-ups and the majority of those favor Houston.

Exactly.

I'm sure if the original poster looked at who the Colts have played and how often they have been managing to, as he put it, 'squeak out wins by one score', then he would take a step back as well.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only way we have a chance is if we manage to keep it close at the end. In there house/division on the line/ after a blowout.

I got the texans winning this game

They are better than we are at pretty much every position. I just hope we are competitive this game.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Turnovers will determine if we can stay in this game...

pulling for the Colts, but after the beatdown.. I see Houston winning this...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two words why I don't like playing Houston in Houston....Ron Dayne !

I still see him running all over our defense!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly.

I'm sure if the original poster looked at who the Colts have played and how often they have been managing to, as he put it, 'squeak out wins by one score', then he would take a step back as well.

That is true. But the Colts aren't supposed to be winning, aren't rated very high, and aren't considered a SB contender. Although I don't really think this analysis shows us much, I think the point you made is just what the OP was trying to say: based on these games and these numbers Houston looks as good, or as beatable, as the Colts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is interesting, it implies their D isnt as stout as we think. I'm more concerned about our D facing their offense. Another test against a big WR. They also have a very good QB, and top 5 RB.

It's not. The Dline is still very good but the LBers and secondary are kinda struggling. The injury bug is catching up to them on D, if we can shut down Foster we have a good chance. While Houston on the other hand is looking at our Oline and lack of RBs as our biggest weakness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still see him running all over our defense!

Yes and the problem is that the Texans had never beaten us until that game so like a duckling imprinting on the mother duck their institution memory since that game is that when they beat us they do it by running all over us (as they did in the opener last year). For sure they'll believe they can run right thru us.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes and the problem is that the Texans had never beaten us until that game so like a duckling imprinting on the mother duck their institution memory since that game is that when they beat us they do it by running all over us (as they did in the opener last year). *For sure they'll believe they can run right thru us.*

This is a horse of a different color though.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only interesting part is the nature of the Texans games. They don't blow teams out, and the Colts win close games.

Texans apparently do more pass defense at the line than in the secondary.

I'm not counting on anything other than a difficult 60 minutes, but the Colts aren't buried yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a horse of a different color though.

The Texans don't know that yet (but hopefully after Sunday they will).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly.

I'm sure if the original poster looked at who the Colts have played and how often they have been managing to, as he put it, 'squeak out wins by one score', then he would take a step back as well.

I don't think the point was that the Texans aren't good, certainly not that they aren't better than the Colts. What I got from it was just that, even though they're good and have been winning, they've been in close games. It's possible that this game could be close, and we do a pretty good job in one score games.

In other words, don't write the Colts off just yet.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Texans don't know that yet (but hopefully after Sunday they will).

We better though, what I've been hearing is their passing offense greatly depends on Foster being successful on the ground, they can not just rely on Schabb passing the ball. That might sound cliche but many passing offenses don't need to be set up by the run, I guess Houston is extremely dependent on it.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly.

I'm sure if the original poster looked at who the Colts have played and how often they have been managing to, as he put it, 'squeak out wins by one score', then he would take a step back as well.

No, actually I was well aware, the point is that we WIN the one score games, losing just one all season on last second TD that we fell apart on.

If we keep it close we have a very good chance to win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a horse of a different color though.

Now that I think about it the horse is still blue but it's a different shade of blue on the d-line.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.houstonte...n-schedule.html

I decided to take a look at the schedule of the Texans after that blowout last night.

I was actually very surprised by what I found.

The Texans defense is pretty stout, but let's look at the QB's they faced to get those wins.

Week 1. Ryan Tannehill = W 30-10

Week 2. Blaine Gabbert = W 27-7

Week 3 Peyton Manning = W 31-25

Week 4. Locker / Hasselbeck = W 38-14

Week 5. Mark Sanchez = W 23-17

Week 6. Aaron Rodgers = L 42-24

Week 7 Joe Flacco = W 43-13

Week 9 Ryan Fitzpatrick = W 21-9

Week 10 Cutler / Campbell = W 13-6

Week 11 Gabbert / Henne = W 43-37

Week 12 Matthew Stafford = W 34-31

Week 13 Jake Locker = W 24-10

Week 14 Tom Brady = L 42-14

I don't know, maybe it's just me but these statistics seem encouraging. The Texans have been squeaking out wins by about one score since week 10. Texans haven't really done well against really good QB's except Manning, but he was still rusty at week 3. In 3 separate games this year Texans faced the backup QB off the bench due to injury.

Maybe it's just me, but looking at this on paper, I think the Colts have a much better chance to win than I had originally thought. Now i'm not saying we are a lock to win, that is just foolish, but I think we stand a better chance than most are giving us credit for.

Anyone else find this interesting?

yea, same here, i am starting to get more confidence than I had about a week to a week and a half ago. I was desperatly worried about how our moral would take a kick in the pants if we got slaughtered in Houston, now it's still a possibility but there is a lot of pride at stake and I think the Colts will play as hard as they can because a playoff birth is at stake. Oh wait, did I say steak/stake, time to go to the van and eat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they don't have more plays where Luck rolls out he is going to be on his back all day long. I hope he survives this game. I think we are going to lose big and we need him against KC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, actually I was well aware, the point is that we WIN the one score games, losing just one all season on last second TD that we fell apart on.

If we keep it close we have a very good chance to win.

So I'm just going to come out and ask the question...

Since Houston has only lost 2 games, and neither were close... Wouldn't that leave them undefeated in close games?

I'm not sure the OP's point is entirely relevant in this game. Since the Colts haven't blown anyone away, of course I'd prefer a close game (so you're saying there's a chance) over getting romped... but the Texans are pretty darned good in close games too.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It may be more relevant to suggest we discard the first few games for the Colts (as too green), and compare what's happened since to the Texans' results...

Sweep Titans... check

Win in a shoot out over the Lions... check

Get blown out by the Patriots... check

Beat down the Jags on the road... check

Hold court with the Fins and Bills... check

These 2 teams may now be more equal than many think. All our rookies aren't really so rookie-esque any more, and we've been seeing better play on the road (except in NE).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Put me in the agree column as well. Explain to me blocking scheme we will implement to slow down JJ Watt. Last week we basically had no answers in the first half for the Titans rush. Sometimes you just have to admit the other team is better. Houston does not want to go back to New England so the home field incentive is huge. New England destroys everyone in there house. What did the Colts do there? Lets just take the two New England contest for comparisons. Case closed.

Seriously? Following that logic, we should have written off these Colts in a vast majority of our games. Obviously the Texans are a "better" team, both record wise and matchup wise. That is totally irrelevant though. I mean our 2-14 Colts last year beat the Texans when we were at a significant disadvantage. I'll concede all day that they're a "better" team, but that doesn't mean I dont think we can go into Houston and smack them in the face. This is football, not basketball where certain players just decide to turn it on and the other team has no chance. It requires a complete team effort. Now that is not to say that I think a victory in Houston is likely; however, not many of our wins this year have been likely. Now if you really want to compare something in our favor, let's talk clutch factor. We know how to win ugly, the Texans don't (unless you count the Jags game haha). They haven't really been tested by a ton of teams this year until recently, and the ones they have been tested by have blown them out. The Jags and Detroit almost beat the Texans and we have far more heart than them. Just because the advantages we own over the Texans aren't quantifiable does not mean that they are any less significant to the outcome of the game. If we keep Luck upright, then we have as good a chance as anyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Winning ugly only gets so far. Matchups are the most important in the NFL and we do not match up well. Are running back is not even close to theirs. Our blocking schemes will not stop JJ Watt the way New England did. When you just get down to basic fundamental football, the knowledgeable realistic football fan understands why Houston is favored. That does not mean the Colts cannot beat them. The fact is more times than not the better team wins. It is sometimes tough to swallow, but at this point it is definitely a huge challenge for the Colts to defeat the Texans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Winning ugly only gets so far. Matchups are the most important in the NFL and we do not match up well. Are running back is not even close to theirs. Our blocking schemes will not stop JJ Watt the way New England did. When you just get down to basic fundamental football, the knowledgeable realistic football fan understands why Houston is favored. That does not mean the Colts cannot beat them. The fact is more times than not the better team wins. It is sometimes tough to swallow, but at this point it is definitely a huge challenge for the Colts to defeat the Texans.

I agree. The Colts should just forfeit. 2-0. KC next.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we keep it close we have a very good chance to win.

lol. thats really going out on a limb.

All I know is that if they Hurt Luck...... We got a Problem.

We have Mr. Irrelevant. I'm not worried.

Put me in the agree column as well. Explain to me blocking scheme we will implement to slow down JJ Watt. Last week we basically had no answers in the first half for the Titans rush. Sometimes you just have to admit the other team is better. Houston does not want to go back to New England so the home field incentive is huge. New England destroys everyone in there house. What did the Colts do there? Lets just take the two New England contest for comparisons. Case closed.

^ l iike this guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Put me in the agree column as well. Explain to me blocking scheme we will implement to slow down JJ Watt. Last week we basically had no answers in the first half for the Titans rush. Sometimes you just have to admit the other team is better. Houston does not want to go back to New England so the home field incentive is huge. New England destroys everyone in there house. What did the Colts do there? Lets just take the two New England contest for comparisons. Case closed.

Not sure I understand. The Colts actually didn't look as bad as the Texans looked. We even led on a couple of occasions. The Texans were beat in the first quarter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your right you do not understand.

Thanks for explaining. Now I get it.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sign WR James Jones - It makes too much sense.
      I think Robinson will be better than Toler at a minimum.  Anything else is extra gravy.  I like what we have with Mitchel and Djoun Smith for the nickel spots. I don't have much doubt that Smith can play the Nickel at a minimum.  Mitchel I think has enough length to play inside or outside. Plus Butler is still there for now.   I like some of the other guys like Davies, Winston Rose, Glover Wright.  I think there some young guys who will pan out out of that bunch.
    • Sign WR James Jones - It makes too much sense.
      I'm not so confident on the back end. I think things could work out. S isn't as big of a concern I like Southward and Greens measurables for sure. Guy wasn't horrible If Adams goes down that's potential for a problem. We have shown we can find help at S if need be.    CB I'm more concerned. It's my biggest concern on the team. We only have Davis who we know can play the boundary.    We brought Robinson in to play the otherside we know he has been inconsistent at best out there. He excels in the slot. Brown looked great in the preseason but couldn't carry it to Sunday then was on the IR by week 4. Could another offseason with Pagano get him straight? Maybe. It possible and I'm hopeful Smith grows up quickly. Butler we know sucks on the outside but he was worse in the slot last year. He may be cut.    I like the young guys. Mitchel could help. I like what I know about Glover-Wright and Milton. I want to see White too.  Milton is my dark horse.    I would feel better if we took a CB in the draft. We passed on some guys that could have helped on the outside Russell then Fuller in the 3rd was a steal. I would have been good with Sims or Hall both small school guys in the 4th. We could have rolled the dice on Robinson from LSU. I really liked Sims there. Morrison I really don't like that pick. I don't see what they think they see. The fact that they think they outsmarted everyone is more troubling.    The back end and specifically the CB position is very costly to fix in FA. I think that position will determine how dangerous we are this year. You are only as good as your weakest link to me the back end, boundary CB is our weakest link. 
    • Seen Any Good Movies Lately? Rental Or New Release...Share Your Insights/Reviews Please...
      I was wondering about the risk involved, so I'm glad that you brought up the point about Snowden not divulging any identities. I wasn't sure how far he went when this was released.   I agree with you that Putin gave Snowden asylum partly to antagonize the administration. I don't know that for sure; it's my opinion.   I doubt that Snowden will ever return to the United States, so I imagine that he's adjusting well to his new life.
    • Colts' Scouts: What they liked about LeRaven Clark....
      I actually forgot to mention my thoughts on your last line. As to understanding where players are properly evaluated and or valued is in the eye of the beholder. That's not opinion. That's definitely a fact. It takes 1 team to value a player as a 3rd round pick (for example) but the other 31 may value him as a 4th round pick or hell even later. Different teams value prospects in different rounds. Some may see the same things but many or most will value have players all over the map. To say he went where he was supposed to go is simply an opinion even if backed up by some draft gurus. To me he was a 4th round prospect and I could really care less about most of his measurable minus the bench press (which was actually backed up on film to, He is not completely weak but its clear to see he lacks strength which I bet gets worse as games go along and is tied to endurance. My opinion of course, Nothing more, Just based on what I saw).   And yes I'm willing to bet had we past on him he would have lasted till the 4th, We know 18 teams past on him in the 3rd before the Colts took him. That's over half the NFL did not think well of him enough to make him there 3rd round pick. Also 1 of those teams (Browns) passed up on him and chose an OT Shonn Coleman instead. Again I did not see him as a 3rd round pick and 18 teams agreed with me...and its not hard to see why
  • Welcome New Members

    • Member Introductions! (Say Hi!)
      Hello my Name is Robin. And i'm from Denmark. even though i've been member on this forum for a long time, and the old one as well. I would like to Introduce myself. I became a Colts fan in 2007, when I watched my first NFL game. My brother introduced me to NFL, the superbowl between Colts & Bears, And as we all know the Bears scored first, so I had to rude for the "underdogs".. and from that day on I was hooked. I've watched every game since, even the primetime games, that starts 2:30 in Denmark, it's a long day working with no sleep but damn its worth it. Can't wait for my next big Colts adventure, when I get to see them playing in London 
    • Member Introductions! (Say Hi!)
      I have been a fan since 1984 when I became an early teen and really started to understand the game. Colts moved to Indianapolis in 1984 and eventhough we stunk for a while, things obviously got better. We traded for Dickerson in 1987 and won the Division, then we had Harbaugh's magical season in 1995, the Peyton ERA where winning 12 games was a piece of cake + winning a SB in 2006, now the Andrew ERA where we have already had 3 11 win seasons and a deep Playoff run.
  • Members

    • Archer

      Archer 586

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dw49

      dw49 2,115

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • That Guy

      That Guy 513

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CF4L

      CF4L 27

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • White shoes

      White shoes 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 10,402

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Ollonesomeme

      Ollonesomeme 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • esmort

      esmort 936

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bap03Colts

      bap03Colts 140

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BleedBlu8792

      BleedBlu8792 691

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.