Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

House

Breaking New: Saints bounty suspensions have been Vacated.

46 posts in this topic

At the end of the day Goodell screwed it up by not releasing any real concrete evidence but insisting that he had some

At the end of the day...The Saints were guilty to all who read the evidence...

many fans simply wont..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At the end of the day Goodell screwed it up by not releasing any real concrete evidence but insisting that he had some

Maybe he's holding it because of an active defamation suit filed by Vilma. Makes them get the evidence via discovery, not CNN / ESPN.

Paul Tagliabue got it all, and says between 22-27 Saints defenders participated, but Not (in any serious degree) Scott Fujita.

Going to be hard for Vilma to win, he has to prove-

  1. Someone made a statement;
  2. that statement was published;
  3. the statement caused you injury;
  4. the statement was false; and
  5. the statement did not fall into a privileged category.

Goodell already has a second party backing up what his original statement was. RE: #4. Only difference was Goodell wanted to suspend / fine a few of the alleged, whereas the seconding party does not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The comment and link weren't the same point.

The link was released today stating that they would go after "the next" qb which was Peyton. I posted that in response to your saying " They didn't go after Peyton in the super bowl. Wouldn't you think that would have been the case."

The fact that the nature of the bounty program needs spelled out every time it's brought up is why the notion that the Saints weren't doing anything is being propagated.

I'm sure the NFL is wrong as well, but there was indeed a bounty program. It's not my opinion.

Saints coaches swore on the record that there WAS a bounty programs as far back at 2010..

Tagliabue just commuted the sentences for the guilty

Tagliabue said the Saints were guilty as sin...he just blamed the coaches and not the players.

Read what he said

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Saints coaches swore on the record that there WAS a bounty programs as far back at 2010..

At first, all the coached denied, through gritted teeth. Only later did they fess up.

Tagliabue just commuted the sentences for the guilty

True, but he also stated they participated in activity that was indeed conduct detrimental...

Tagliabue said the Saints were guilty as sin...he just blamed the coaches and not the players.

Nah, not really. He really does blame all, but only allows coaches/FO punishments. He eliminates player sentences, but doesn't condone their actions in doing so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OKay, if I'm way off base here just tell me.

 

Basically, Gregg Williams & Sean Payton admitted some level of guilt in either the participation in or turning a blind eye to the creation of a bounty system, but NFL Commissioner wasn't able to prove that players like Jonathan Vilma, Scott Fujita, & Anthony Hargrove directly put money in or took my out of the actual bounty ledger correct?

 

Is that the lay of the land in a nutshell? 

 
 
 
 
 
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OKay, if I'm way off base here just tell me.

 

Basically, Gregg Williams & Sean Payton admitted some level of guilt in either the participation in or turning a blind eye to the creation of a bounty system, but NFL Commissioner wasn't able to prove that players like Jonathan Vilma, Scott Fujita, & Anthony Hargrove directly put money in or took my out of the actual bounty ledger correct?

 

Is that the lay of the land in a nutshell? 

 

How about adding in sponsoring it, and not ceasing it when the league found out and asked them stop? And destroying evidence about it so league couldn't tell if they had cleaned up their act or not?

 

And I am pretty certain they have some physical evidence, and evidence of other evidence being and/or having been destroyed.  That which remains has not been let out publicly AFAIK, but was reviewed by Paul Tagliabue.  He is the one saying that (remaining) evidence shows between 22 - 27 Saints defensive players could have been punished by Goodell.  I don't think any of us will see any of this evidence in the public domain, especially while Jonathan Vilma has an active defamation lawsuit in the court system.  And maybe ever.  They just want to wrap this up and it all to go away and not happen again.

 

And my take on it?  Possibly, if Goodell would have punished all 22 or so players their evidence shows participated, and with the same amount in fines / suspension days, Tagliabue may not have overturned those either and just let the courts handle it.  He pretty much said Yes, the players did it, it's definitely "conduct detrimental to the league".  But he feels Goodell's singling a few out and vast disparity in punishment was improper, and thus vacated those punishments.
 
And Tagliabue's rendering has also strengthened Goodell's position against Vilma's defamation case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Woman has to know her place....
    • As far as I know, Eminem is the only rapper to list his favorite rappers in a song.   His top rappers are:   1.  Reggie  (His uncle) 2.  Jay-Z 3. Tupac 4.  Biggie 5.  Andre 3000 6.  Jada 7.  Kurupt 8.  Nas 9.  Eminem   Being last does not offend him, he made the list.   Either way, the spirit of God lives in us.
    • Very sad... He was a part of so many amazing tunes.   
    • I don't like anything about Frank Sinatra, tbh.    His music was before my time, but I enjoy a lot of other music and film from that era. I'm from the Midwest and it's hard for me to relate to those songs. They all seem to have a New York/Vegas feel to them (and not in a good, Sonic Youth way). A lot of it seems... insincere, for lack of a better word. I kind of compare it to today's teen bop bubble gum type music where the personality and public persona and "coolness" factor of the artist are as important as the actual music. However, like I said, I wasn't alive at the time to know whether that is the case or not.   Maybe I just don't get it (like many people don't get rap or jazz) but what Sinatra did doesn't sound like singing to me. He didn't seem to have any vocal range. He didn't play instruments (that I know of) or dance. It's really bewildering to me that he is such a cultural icon.    His persona is grating, to me. I never like performers whose image is rich/smooth/connected. Just not my cup of tea.    It also seems to me that Sinatra wasn't that great of a guy, either. I know that there is a culture gap between his generation and mine, so I won't judge him too harshly about what his social views were w/ regard to race and gender equality, but his coziness with organized crime figures ( ie murderers) is troubling.   All of this is just my opinion, of course. I'm not a Frank Sinatra expert, by any means. He just appears, to me, as the antithesis of everything that I enjoy about art.   He's on my short list (along with Gene Simmons, Andy Warhol, L. Ron Hubbard, Ronald Reagan) of sainted cultural icons who didn't actually contribute anything of value to their respective fields. Again, jmo... your definition of value might differ from mine. 
    • Not to mean this in an argumentative way but the changes in the Colts winning ways was started by Harbaugh. We were one play from reaching the super bowl against the Steelers. Take away the illegal TD that Stewart caught and that game may have had a different turn out.
  • Welcome New Members

    •   Sorry to keep harping on the Irish thing, but did you know the horseshoe has seven points on it?  (The Colts horseshoe, anyway.  Actual shoes for horses depend on the farrier).   Seven is considered a lucky number...  Lucky.  Luck.  I'm telling you, you picked the right team to root for.   7    
    •   Don't hold Boston against the Irish.  It's not our fault.    We love our green, which makes Indiana a tearmann.   I love it that you chose to root for an underdog instead of the Pats.  I don't think it's coincidence that you became a fan around the time Luck got drafted to the Colts.  That's providence.     Horseshoe?  Luck?  Four-leaf clover?  Come on.  Hoosier Hospitality has roots in Irish fun-lovery.  If you're lucky enough to be Irish, you're lucky enough!  May the luck of the Irish be with you!  
  • Members

    • CR91

      CR91 4,947

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 4,899

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • WoolMagnet

      WoolMagnet 1,135

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BOTT

      BOTT 9,406

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonColt

      ClaytonColt 195

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfeva

      coltsfeva 322

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Peterk2011

      Peterk2011 32

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 216

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.