Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

unitaswestand

Caldwell New Raven OC

64 posts in this topic

Harbaugh: Jim, we just had a three and out after attempting three runs in a row. Mix it up a bit.

Caldwell: (Blinks)

Harbaugh: Okay, you just got another three and out, but I like that you had a pass play in there. Keep mixing it up.

Caldwell: (Blinks)

Harbaugh: Hey Jim, we're down two scores now. We need to open up the offense a bit and get back in this game.

Caldwell: (Blinks)

Harbaugh: We're getting blown out here. Do you have anything in that playbook to get the offense going?

Caldwell: (Opens mouth... Blinks again)

Harbaugh: Oh ****.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

funny thing is, i read on rotoworld yesterday, is that they fired cam for being vanilla and not making adjustments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That awkward moment when Jim admits that Peyton was the OC all of those years......I hate to say that about Jim because he's definitely my fraternity brother :-(

nupe??
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is he suddenly the coordinator?

I heard Harbaugh fired him to make Joe flacco happy

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We scored on our1st possession of the game and then could not do anything afterwards. We come out to start the 2nd half and have I believe a 14 play 80 yard drive for a TD. We then score on 2 other offensive possessions in the second half. That tells me that there were offensive adjustments made since we could move the ball and get points in the second half when we were unable to in the first half.

The only offensive adjustments made in the 2nd half were injuries. Justice and Satele leaving the game seemed to improve our protection slightly. You'd be better served to tell me what adjustments were made, as opposed to taking the lazy approach of saying, "points were scored, so adjustments were made." What did we do differently offensively in the 2nd half that we didn't try to do in the 1st? He didn't change his strategy at all. He called run plays from tight formations and continually called empty backfields on 3rd down, regardless of what happened the play before. He does that every game. So where are these adjustments you speak of?

You still haven’t answered my question about your general statement that the new guy is not much better than the old guy. You keep wanting to just use the last game as your proof weak as it is. We have scored in the second half and won games all year. If you are going to make general statements like you have, tell me how that is not making offensive adjustments.

I talked about the Titans game because YOU brought it up. I can give you several instances where he failed to make adjustments from half to half. The Detroit game, there were no adjustments made on offense. The key plays that sparked the victory came on broken plays. The bomb to Brazil, Luck was flushed from the pocket and took a shot down field. The game winning touchdown was also a broken play where Luck was chased from the pocket and hit Avery on the drag (which Arians himself admitted was actually the last read in the post game)...The New England game was a colossal failure to adjust on Arians part. He played right into the Pats hands continuing to call deep shots down the field because of what he perceived to be a weak secondary. We had the lead early but literally passed our way out of that game. No adjustments were made when it was obvious their pass rush wasn't allowing Luck to deliver the ball comfortably (hence, the forced throws and turnovers.) So once again, what adjustments are you seeing be made from half to half out of Arians? He's not calling anything differently, he's just the beneficiary of talented offensive players bailing him out and making him look better than he really is.

Look at the plays called, not the outcome of the plays. That will tell you what you need to know about a coordinator. Arians isn't changing his strategy at all. Luck and Wayne just have a knack for making something happen when a play is broken, and make Arians chicken s*** look like chicken salad

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pick any of the following faces for the moment after they told Caldwell that he is the OC now....

TheManyFacesAndEmotionsOfJimCaldwell.jpg

Just his great motivational tactics Lolly :woah::funny::spit: .......the facial expressions alone make me want to play for the genius..... :peek:Good%20Bad.gif:sarcasm:
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only offensive adjustments made in the 2nd half were injuries. Justice and Satele leaving the game seemed to improve our protection slightly. You'd be better served to tell me what adjustments were made, as opposed to taking the lazy approach of saying, "points were scored, so adjustments were made." What did we do differently offensively in the 2nd half that we didn't try to do in the 1st? He didn't change his strategy at all. He called run plays from tight formations and continually called empty backfields on 3rd down, regardless of what happened the play before. He does that every game. So where are these adjustments you speak of?

I talked about the Titans game because YOU brought it up. I can give you several instances where he failed to make adjustments from half to half. The Detroit game, there were no adjustments made on offense. The key plays that sparked the victory came on broken plays. The bomb to Brazil, Luck was flushed from the pocket and took a shot down field. The game winning touchdown was also a broken play where Luck was chased from the pocket and hit Avery on the drag (which Arians himself admitted was actually the last read in the post game)...The New England game was a colossal failure to adjust on Arians part. He played right into the Pats hands continuing to call deep shots down the field because of what he perceived to be a weak secondary. We had the lead early but literally passed our way out of that game. No adjustments were made when it was obvious their pass rush wasn't allowing Luck to deliver the ball comfortably (hence, the forced throws and turnovers.) So once again, what adjustments are you seeing be made from half to half out of Arians? He's not calling anything differently, he's just the beneficiary of talented offensive players bailing him out and making him look better than he really is.

Look at the plays called, not the outcome of the plays. That will tell you what you need to know about a coordinator. Arians isn't changing his strategy at all. Luck and Wayne just have a knack for making something happen when a play is broken, and make Arians chicken s*** look like chicken salad

I like you... dont worry... well unless I start to worry :-)... I kid I kkid but seriously someone listen to this man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where do I start? He's predictable (run plays only come out of heavy formations, pass plays only come out of spread formations), obsessed with the vertical pass, doesn't alter strategy when scheme isn't working, and his offense has no continuity (runs for decent yardage on 2nd down. 3rd down, opts to pass up opportunity for play action and calls an empty backfield)

He's a man without a plan, in my opinion. He calls plays based on his gut. No strategy or forethought, whatsoever

Well, I think his "gut" has done pretty good this year. Hey also, how do you like my gut ? :puke: :puke:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Harbaugh: Jim, we just had a three and out after attempting three runs in a row. Mix it up a bit.

Caldwell: (Blinks)

Harbaugh: Okay, you just got another three and out, but I like that you had a pass play in there. Keep mixing it up.

Caldwell: (Blinks)

Harbaugh: Hey Jim, we're down two scores now. We need to open up the offense a bit and get back in this game.

Caldwell: (Blinks)

Harbaugh: We're getting blown out here. Do you have anything in that playbook to get the offense going?

Caldwell: (Opens mouth... Blinks again)

Harbaugh: Oh ****.

Can't you just picture this gripping & riveting scene on NFL Soundtracks via NFL Films. haha:funny: The cameras guys would fall asleep in the large video truck. :lol::spit:lmao Is the mike on?! :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Caldwell lack of emotions shown debunked-

Fans watching at home only see what cameras want ya to see

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard Harbaugh fired him to make Joe flacco happy

I heard the owner might have had something to do with it. Strange move at this point in the season. Here's the thing with the Raven's D if they score 28 points in a game I don't really blame the offense for them losing. That's like blaming a team built around offense's defense for a lose if they only give up 17 points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can just imagine the smile and look of excitement on his face......oh wait.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Caldwell lack of emotions shown debunked-

Fans watching at home only see what cameras want ya to see

Whoa..& the Emmy for best...heck let alone any emotions on the sidelines goes to Jim Caldwell. I didn't know he could do that. Since when do robots express genuine anger & emotion? haha Sorry Jim...

Nice post Gavin! :thmup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand why this hasn't been moved to nfl general. It's not colts related. All of the Peyton manning threads were moved over without hesitation, once he was a bronco... Soooo.... What's the deal! Man!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand why this hasn't been moved to nfl general. It's not colts related. All of the Peyton manning threads were moved over without hesitation, once he was a bronco... Soooo.... What's the deal! Man!

In the future, would you please use the report link when you see something that needs to be moved. That would be helpful.

Everybody here should help keep the boards organized.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the future, would you please use the report link when you see something that needs to be moved. That would be helpful.

Everybody here should help keep the boards organized.

In the future I will do this. Always thought reporting was for troublesome people or trolls etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the future, would you please use the report link when you see something that needs to be moved. That would be helpful.

Everybody here should help keep the boards organized.

Thats excellent advice, u know i am sure u have told me same , but never remembered it and on other threads on this topic I r took asked for merger and it was though u didnt tell me about this report link thiss time

NOW I DO SEE IT- HOPEFULLY I WILL REMEMBER IT, thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the future I will do this. Always thought reporting was for troublesome people or trolls etc.

me too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the future I will do this. Always thought reporting was for troublesome people or trolls etc.

Thanks so much!

Report is for anything that needs mod action. We try to be everywhere but it's not possible.

We appreciate it when people pitch in and help keep things organized.

Now............is there was some magical way to get people to title their posts so that people know what they are..........AND not create duplicate threads

That would be awesome!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much!

Report is for anything that needs mod action. We try to be everywhere but it's not possible.

We appreciate it when people pitch in and help keep things organized.

Now............is there was some magical way to get people to title their posts so that people know what they are..........AND not create duplicate threads

That would be awesome!

That is true and sometimes forum members like me may say something that seems critical but its not meant to be, we all know & appreciate the dedicated hard work moderators do , give yourself a million likes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Peyton Manning says Caldwell took his game to another level while he was there since 2002.

“He’s very detail-oriented. He and I are very similar that way — very routine-oriented,” Manning said. “I miss being in his presence every day, because that was really a fun time that he and I had together.”

“I felt like he really took my game to another level. He’s also a tremendous mentor and friend to me,” Manning said. “I can speak to him as a person and what kind of a coach he was to me.”

http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/ravens/ravens-insider/bal-peyton-manning-says-jim-caldwell-took-my-game-to-another-level-20121212,0,5824323.story

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only offensive adjustments made in the 2nd half were injuries. Justice and Satele leaving the game seemed to improve our protection slightly. You'd be better served to tell me what adjustments were made, as opposed to taking the lazy approach of saying, "points were scored, so adjustments were made." What did we do differently offensively in the 2nd half that we didn't try to do in the 1st? He didn't change his strategy at all. He called run plays from tight formations and continually called empty backfields on 3rd down, regardless of what happened the play before. He does that every game. So where are these adjustments you speak of?

I talked about the Titans game because YOU brought it up. I can give you several instances where he failed to make adjustments from half to half. The Detroit game, there were no adjustments made on offense. The key plays that sparked the victory came on broken plays. The bomb to Brazil, Luck was flushed from the pocket and took a shot down field. The game winning touchdown was also a broken play where Luck was chased from the pocket and hit Avery on the drag (which Arians himself admitted was actually the last read in the post game)...The New England game was a colossal failure to adjust on Arians part. He played right into the Pats hands continuing to call deep shots down the field because of what he perceived to be a weak secondary. We had the lead early but literally passed our way out of that game. No adjustments were made when it was obvious their pass rush wasn't allowing Luck to deliver the ball comfortably (hence, the forced throws and turnovers.) So once again, what adjustments are you seeing be made from half to half out of Arians? He's not calling anything differently, he's just the beneficiary of talented offensive players bailing him out and making him look better than he really is.

Look at the plays called, not the outcome of the plays. That will tell you what you need to know about a coordinator. Arians isn't changing his strategy at all. Luck and Wayne just have a knack for making something happen when a play is broken, and make Arians chicken s*** look like chicken salad

 

Thank You for the explanation. I understand your point of view better

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Posts

    • Remember Aaron Moorehead?
      Rhetorical question that applies to all schools - not just A&M. Just pointing out the schools are complicit in this not holding commitments as well.
    • Josh Ferguson!!!!!
      So was JaMarcus Russell,  Johnny Manziel,   Brady Quinn and a host of others.   Osweiler was drafted in the second
    • Predict THIS!!! Who Will Be the O-Line Starters Week 1?
      I thought Reitz played right tackle pretty well. I've already heard Pagano and Grigson talk about how Clark may be moved to the right guard spot. I think it's going to be good competition this season on the O-Line but this is just how I would go about it.
    • 2015-2016 Indiana Pacers (And rest of the NBA) Season
      To the bolded, we should have been better. PG is worth more than 7 games, and I'm not a huge PG fan. Boston won 3 more games than the Pacers, and I don't believe that roster is better. The difference? Brad Stevens. The team needs a coach who can continuously develop the players and put them in the best position to succeed. I know that's few and far between, and they don't grow on trees, but sticking with Vogel has run its course.    As far as Hill and Ellis not being able to fill the PG position, again I think they are suitable enough for the position. However, my biggest gripe with George Hill is not playing aggressive enough consistently. When the guy is aggressive, he can be as good as anyone, but far too often he's not. Again, I place a decent amount of blame on the coaching staff for not keeping on Hill. It goes back to the Heat playoff games 3 years ago, when Hill was attempting 12-15+ shots/g the Pacers had the advantage, but when he was under 10 shots/g, the Pacers chances of winning were practically minimal.   Westbrook is an undersized SG as well. By no means am I saying Hill is as good as Westbrook, or could be as good, but Westbrook plays with a "killer" instinct, and that's something I wish Hill would do. We've seen the flashes when plays with that instinct.
    • JaMarcus Russell seeking redemption. Will work for free.
      I think it has to do more with the general attitude of coaches don't think he can read defenses. He may very well be physically able to play football be will he ever have the ability to read defenses is the question. Also does he have the ability to hit a receiver? That is one of the problems he had when he did play. If you remember he threw a lot of passes that landed 5-10 yards from anyone on the field. He had more than his share of "who was he throwing the ball to" said after he did throw the ball.
  • Topics

  • Welcome New Members

  • Members

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.