Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ColtStrong

Refs were horrendous

25 posts in this topic

I don't remember seeing that many horse manure calls since the replacement refs were in there. Ticked me off til no end. I wanted to reach through the TV and strangle someone.

They definitely did their best to keep the titans in the game. I understand there will always be a couple bad/questionable calls every game, but today was a pathetic attempt at officiating. I hope they all get reamed new ones.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I said my peace on them in another thread but at least the replacement refs had the excuse of being replacements. This is why I didn't really care about the regular refs back yes some of them are really good but honestly the only difference between some of them (like the ones today) and the replacement refs is the spotlight that was shined on the replacement refs.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I missed the game.... Had family commitments all day.

All I know is, We WON. :cheer:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the refs do get rated/evaluated each game and the least missed calls are used in the playoffs and they get the extra paychecks, so there is incentive to get the calls right, but I saw 4 terrible calls go Titans way, I thought also they wanted to keep the Titans in the game...not like days of old, replays are in HD and super slow motion and stopped pics you can see everything, even the huge stadium screens so there is no excuse to get turnovers and scores wrong...No excuses!!!!!

Anybody here watch Nascar? Even when the cars are running 100 to 200 mph depending on the tracks they can show the wheels barely moving around corners and clear as in normal speed, HD and flat screens have changed sport to like unbelievable!!!!! So with the technology all calls should be gotten right in review, everybody sees it. In 08 I bought a 32" samsung 720 LCD flat screen "was and emergency and was 900 bucks and that's all I had" I can get a 60 inch now for what I paid back then for a 32 :}LOL and went from a 27" RCA tube TV that burt out and it was like going from the 50's to 2008 :}LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

True, but don't forget McAfee's punt inside the one yd line that led to C. Vaughn's pick 6. There was a false start on us that wasn't called that play. Lots of bad calls, majority (but not all) against us.

We overcame them, like a team is supposed to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Refs will make mistakes and dumb calls. No excuse, the better teams find ways to overcome "circumstances"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Refs will make mistakes and dumb calls. No excuse, the better teams find ways to overcome "circumstances"

This is true, but how many refs make on the order of 6 or 7 really bad calls in a game? This game was rank with terrible calls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

True, but don't forget McAfee's punt inside the one yd line that led to C. Vaughn's pick 6. There was a false start on us that wasn't called that play. Lots of bad calls, majority (but not all) against us.

We overcame them, like a team is supposed to do.

also dont forget the penaltie on bethea which was ridiculous, the penalty on Foukou which was agian ridiculous...on 3rd down both of them.

I though while the first Arians challenge was premature, it was a drop IMO. Also wasnt TY knee down before the feet touch out of bounds?

the only call that went our way was the false start on special teams i think

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Refs will make mistakes and dumb calls. No excuse, the better teams find ways to overcome "circumstances"

But this has to be addressed..

Bad calls all over the league..

The refs must make correct calls.........they are sub par

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And these are the "real" refs ... LOL! As I said from the start of the season the media created and fueled a story about "replacemen" refs ... least they had a valid excuse for missing a call or two - those guys out there right now are pathetic and without an excuse, yet the media is mummmmmmm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

also dont forget the penaltie on bethea which was ridiculous, the penalty on Foukou which was agian ridiculous...on 3rd down both of them.

I though while the first Arians challenge was premature, it was a drop IMO. Also wasnt TY knee down before the feet touch out of bounds?

the only call that went our way was the false start on special teams i think

I was screaming at the TV about that catch by TY. He had the ball secured with a knee down before he went out of bounds. I can't be too upset about Arians throwing the flag on Wrights reception but unless it could be a turnover or something like that you HAVE to hold on to that challenge especially that early in the game. That lead to TY's reception being not being challenge-able nor Chris Johnson's fumble. Those are possession changing plays, Wrights was not as I'm pretty sure that play was on 2nd down. Arians baffles me at times with his management "calls".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I agree that yesterday's game was as badly officiated as I have seen in awhile, remember that Seattle is in the hunt for the playoffs and could even get a first round bye because of the replacement refs. Even if we had lost as a result of the bad calls yesterday, we still could control our own destiny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well Mortinsen on ESPN just took up for the refs. He said they were never shown the repay shot that clearly showed Luck's knee down. While I agree the refs were bad , the producers (CBS) get to decide what replays to show the refs. This should be changed. It has cost us for years. CBS has an agenda.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Calls that could have killed us yesterday.

1. Wright dropped it and they reviewed still missed it

2. TY's catch they missed. Caught it in bounds

3. CJ's obvious Fumble

4. Luck's pick 6

5. 41's PI that was great D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Mortinsen on ESPN just took up for the refs. He said they were never shown the repay shot that clearly showed Luck's knee down. While I agree the refs were bad , the producers (CBS) get to decide what replays to show the refs. This should be changed. It has cost us for years. CBS has an agenda.

So CBS has it out for the Colts? Please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So CBS has it out for the Colts? Please.

Not CBS per se, but I can tell you from my time of watching the Colts (every game) the producers have not shown the correct replay many many times. coincidence? Does not happen on other networks. Just an observation. My main point was TV producers should not be handling this. why not an official?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not CBS per se, but I can tell you from my time of watching the Colts (every game) the producers have not shown the correct replay many many times. coincidence? Does not happen on other networks. Just an observation. My main point was TV producers should not be handling this. why not an official?

The point about a producer handling the replay, I can appreciate. The rest is absolute nonsense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The REFS must have had a lot of TITANS on there FANTASY team that was one of the worst called Colt games i have ever seen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol stats are the facts not an opinion which you offer and nothing else, you say he holds onto the ball to long and ribbles a lot...I showed you proof he does not. You said he Is a bad defender....Clearly he is not as the stats show. How about if I got to the previous year and pick up stats from those same categories? Are they cherry picked to? Not likely because some of them were not good so it supports your narrative that he is bad player.   Calling me stupid is pretty childish by the way...I thought you were better then that. Maybe I'm wrong?   Yes he has skills like Lebron, He can pass well, He can rebound well, He is hard to stop when attacking the basket. He has good basketball instincts on the court. Now the reason he don't put up those numbers is because he isn't as aggressive as those guys . You also forget when he put up those numbers for the Pacers it was in his second year starting. You also disregard that while his points were low with the Clippers he still shot 49.4% and 40% from 3 http://espn.go.com/nba/player/stats/_/id/4244/lance-stephenson He did not fit what the Clippers already had on offense. They to many guys dominating the ball...Crawford. Paul as should. Rivers.   And then when he got traded to the Grizzlies because Rivers wrongly thought he could not play defense he still shot 47.4% and 35% from 3 and had 14.2 points a game for them in 26.6 minutes and only 26 starts plus a double double   You even hear Buckner saying Lance found the right man on a pass and most of these passes are simple passes, Particularly for him. They also help players around him who cant create there own shot help get them an open shot (Scola, West multiple times). Now where Lance was awful at was in catch an shoot situations where he was only 35.1% in 2015 but he averaged less than 1 of those a game in 2015
    • that may be a low estimate         
    • I think the jury is still out on the O-line, though I like that additions (player and coaching) that we saw in the offseason.   The bigest concern IMO is the Pass Rush.  Ideally, Mathis and Cole can have a good year and Maggitt can learn quickly.  
    • Fair enough. My point really was it's much harder to win League MVP than it is SB MVP IMO. To win League MVP you have to be Great for a whole season, to win SB MVP you only have to be Great for 1 day and sometimes only Good. When Tom won SB MVP in 2001 he didn't even play Good. If I included SB MVP's, Tom would still only be up 9-8 for that 3rd criteria. I would much rather win League MVP and a SB compared to winning a SB MVP and a SB. As long as my team won the SB it wouldn't bother me at all if I didn't win SB MVP. Ben never has and nobody ever brings it up, they just talk about his 2 wins. I do think it's important to have at least 1 though just to say you won 1, hence my signature at the bottom. I noted Peyton winning 1 here.
    • http://www.todayspigskin.com/nfl-draft/pre-season-2017-nfl-mock-draft/   We picked Derek Barnett at 21, although I would've switched him with Charles Harris (at the moment) as I think he's a better scheme fit. Still and all, good player at a position of need. Interesting to see how high the running backs were projected to go!
  • Welcome New Members

  • Members

    • myic90

      myic90 51

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • csmopar

      csmopar 1,517

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 2,953

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • wig

      wig 707

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SilentHill

      SilentHill 1,987

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Bluefire4

      Bluefire4 960

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ÅÐØNϧ 1

      ÅÐØNϧ 1 933

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GwinnettColt

      GwinnettColt 303

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Lawrence Owen

      Lawrence Owen 318

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pfcurry

      pfcurry 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.