Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

CR91

we clinched a playoff spot

94 posts in this topic

nicely put

the D held them to only 3 points in 2nd half , & that 3 yard pick 6 what a momentum changer

NEVER COUNT US OUT -- Chuck Strong

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly...5 wins, maybe 6. 9-4, with a strong possibility of at least 10 wins?? No way.

Playoffs??? Hahaha...you're a fool!!

Have to eat my words -I was way wrong. This team is playoff bound. Somebody pinch me!

-d.

Don't worry,,,you weren't the only one. I was right along with you predicting us to go 5-11. Never happier to be wrong! Playoffs aren't clinched yet but we are in a very good position right now. Time to close it out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From The Matrix....

"Here, have a cookie. I promise when you finish eating it you'll be feeling right as rain."

:thmup:

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they play each other in the last game of the season so one of them will end up 9-7 and the colts already hold the tiebreaker over them both

Bengals play the ravens their last game of the season

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they play each other in the last game of the season so one of them will end up 9-7 and the colts already hold the tiebreaker over them both

Bengals play the ravens their last game of the season

YES Bengals play Eagles, Then Steelers Then Ravens

& with that a goodnight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly...5 wins, maybe 6. 9-4, with a strong possibility of at least 10 wins?? No way.

Playoffs??? Hahaha...you're a fool!!

Have to eat my words -I was way wrong. This team is playoff bound. Somebody pinch me!

-d.

How's that dish of crow tasting? Pretty sweet I'm guessing. haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think we clinched yet... I'm not sure of all the tir breakers

I'm pretty sure this is correct. Haven't looked through the rest of the thread yet, so forgive me if someone else has already posted this, but here goes:

The Steelers and Bengals are in 6th and 7th right now, with six losses a piece. They could both win out, and we could lose out, and they'd be ahead of us at 10-6 to our 9-7. We could get pushed down to 7th.

The Jets are in 8th, with seven losses. They could win out, and we could lose out, and we'd have identical 9-7 records, but they would have the tie-breaker due to their head to head victory over us. We could get pushed down to 8th.

I don't even believe we can clinch next week. The Steelers play the Cowboys; the Bengals play the Eagles. If they both win, even if we win, they both can still go past us if we lose our final and they win their final two. Unbelievable, but a 10-6 record doesn't even guarantee us the playoffs at this point. If we win, we guarantee ourselves a better record than the Jets. And if we win and the Bengals or Steelers lose, we guarantee ourselves a better record than one of those two, and then we're in. But that's assuming we win.

If we lose, we don't clinch, period, even if all three of the Steelers, Bengals and Jets lose.

There are a lot of scenarios left. We're probably not looking at a clinching opportunity until Week 16, at the earliest.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its basically a st\raglehold unless we fol;d terribly & afc North wins out bascally & cant as play eachotherr see belopw

Pit & Cincy 7 & 6, we are 9 & 4

Pit & cincy still play eachother so thats a lopss for 1 at least or a tie for both , advantage us

yes but jets can win out to get to 9-7 so colts win, jets loss or bengals and steelers losses gets us in

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the D held them to only 3 points in 2nd half , & that 3 yard pick 6 what a momentum changer

NEVER COUNT US OUT -- Chuck Strong

Yup, as bad as the defense was in the first half, it was that good in the second half. And the three points the Titans did score were basically gifted to them by the refs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Jets wont win out. Their O stinks. @ Tenn, Chargers, @ Bills. Jets could easily lose all three.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

gettem!!

(running like crazy) ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!! can a guy make a honest mistake!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only way we miss the playoffs I believe is either we lose out, and the Steelers and Bengals win 2 and tie when they play eachother(lol), or we lose out and the Jets win out...I think. In other words....we're pretty much in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Jets wont win out. Their O stinks. @ Tenn, Chargers, @ Bills. Jets could easily lose all three.

Its not like those 3 teams are exactly Juggernauts.

I do agree the Jets will most likely lose at least one game but you never know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure this is correct. Haven't looked through the rest of the thread yet, so forgive me if someone else has already posted this, but here goes:

The Steelers and Bengals are in 6th and 7th right now, with six losses a piece. They could both win out, and we could lose out, and they'd be ahead of us at 10-6 to our 9-7. We could get pushed down to 7th.

The Jets are in 8th, with seven losses. They could win out, and we could lose out, and we'd have identical 9-7 records, but they would have the tie-breaker due to their head to head victory over us. We could get pushed down to 8th.

I don't even believe we can clinch next week. The Steelers play the Cowboys; the Bengals play the Eagles. If they both win, even if we win, they both can still go past us if we lose our final and they win their final two. Unbelievable, but a 10-6 record doesn't even guarantee us the playoffs at this point. If we win, we guarantee ourselves a better record than the Jets. And if we win and the Bengals or Steelers lose, we guarantee ourselves a better record than one of those two, and then we're in. But that's assuming we win.

If we lose, we don't clinch, period, even if all three of the Steelers, Bengals and Jets lose.

There are a lot of scenarios left. We're probably not looking at a clinching opportunity until Week 16, at the earliest.

That's correct, and when I saw the OP, I knew it wasn't right. You are correct in your breakdown. WE CANNOT CLINCH yet. If we lose next week, which is a very high probablity, we are far from getting a playoff spot. It's way to early to start trying to do that math (exact math) because there are too many variables. I like to break things down in a flow chart but when I tried, it looked like spagetti because it's still too early and too many paths and such. After next week, I can put the flow-chart together and post it out here....OR,,,,, by that time, the NFL will have their diagrams and such in all likelihood. Nice job on this post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(running like crazy) ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!! can a guy make a honest mistake!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lol!!! It's still pretty exciting!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure this is correct. Haven't looked through the rest of the thread yet, so forgive me if someone else has already posted this, but here goes:

The Steelers and Bengals are in 6th and 7th right now, with six losses a piece. They could both win out, and we could lose out, and they'd be ahead of us at 10-6 to our 9-7. We could get pushed down to 7th.

The Jets are in 8th, with seven losses. They could win out, and we could lose out, and we'd have identical 9-7 records, but they would have the tie-breaker due to their head to head victory over us. We could get pushed down to 8th.

I don't even believe we can clinch next week. The Steelers play the Cowboys; the Bengals play the Eagles. If they both win, even if we win, they both can still go past us if we lose our final and they win their final two. Unbelievable, but a 10-6 record doesn't even guarantee us the playoffs at this point. If we win, we guarantee ourselves a better record than the Jets. And if we win and the Bengals or Steelers lose, we guarantee ourselves a better record than one of those two, and then we're in. But that's assuming we win.

If we lose, we don't clinch, period, even if all three of the Steelers, Bengals and Jets lose.

There are a lot of scenarios left. We're probably not looking at a clinching opportunity until Week 16, at the earliest.

Bengals and Steelers CAN'T both win out. They play each other in week 16.

One of the 2 teams can theoretically pass the Colts if the Colts lose out and either the Bengals or Steelers win out. The Colts would hold the tie breaker over the other.

I believe it will only take 1 more Colts win or a Jets loss for the horseshoe to clinch.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bengals and Steelers CAN'T both win out. They play each other in week 16.

One of the 2 teams can theoretically pass the Colts if the Colts lose out and either the Bengals or Steelers win out. The Colts would hold the tie breaker over the other.

I believe it will only take 1 more Colts win or a Jets loss for the horseshoe to clinch.

Very true. Like I said, there's too many variables to really consider so I didn't want to go too deep. Really, the point was just that we haven't clinched, and though we can clinch next week, it's unlikely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very true. Like I said, there's too many variables to really consider so I didn't want to go too deep. Really, the point was just that we haven't clinched, and though we can clinch next week, it's unlikely.

The tie breaker for wild card teams from different divisions is conference record. It's really not difficut or complicated ... pretty easy to "go there now."

If we win one more game and finish 10-6 , it would make us 7-5 in conference play. The 10 wins eliminate the Jets and the 7-5 conference record would give us the tei breaker of the lower of the two seeds Cin and Pitt.

Pitt is 4-6 with 2 conf games left if they lose the Cinn game , they finish at best 9-7 and 5-7 in conference. So they are behind us in both win -loss and conf record.

If Cinn wins out , they could tie us at 10-6 and tie us in conf at 7-5. So Pitt would be out and Ind and Cinn go to the next tie breaker to see who gets the 5 seed.

So bottom line is 10 wins and the Jets are out. The only way Pitt could get in is to finish ahead of Cinn record wise. They cannot pass us unless they beat Balt for the division. If this happens , Balt loses two of three and loses the division to Cinn or Pitt , I guess it is possible that we could get left out at 10-6 as Balt would have a btterf conference frecord than us. So I guees it is possible 10 wins doesn't get us in and maybe at least , although I was wrong about that , I've showed how it can happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

See what you started?

358560_o.gif

do i get knocked out like pacman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bengals and Steelers CAN'T both win out. They play each other in week 16.

One of the 2 teams can theoretically pass the Colts if the Colts lose out and either the Bengals or Steelers win out. The Colts would hold the tie breaker over the other.

I believe it will only take 1 more Colts win or a Jets loss for the horseshoe to clinch.

More simply put than my post above , I don't think 10 wins is a clincher. If Balt losses 2 of 3 and loses out to Pitt or Cinn for the division , they would have the tie breaker over us as they already have 8 conference wins. Now if Pitt or Cinn can't win a tie breaker with Balt at 10-6 , then we are in with 10 wins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More simply put than my post above , I don't think 10 wins is a clincher. If Balt losses 2 of 3 and loses out to Pitt or Cinn for the division , they would have the tie breaker over us as they already have 8 conference wins. Now if Pitt or Cinn can't win a tie breaker with Balt at 10-6 , then we are in with 10 wins.

Uh yeah, 1 more win and we're in no doubt. It was reported on NFL Channel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Uh yeah, 1 more win and we're in no doubt. It was reported on NFL Channel.

That means Balt has the tie breakers with Pitt and Cinn. I didn't go to wins amoung common opponants (2nd tie breaker) as Pitt and Balt could both end up at 10-6 and 4-2 in the division. Cinn already has 3 division losses , so we know they lose the tie breaker. Thanks, good to hear that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have proved time and again we're worthy of being in the playoff tournament with all the late season wins and heroics.....

I believe we'll be there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The tie breaker for wild card teams from different divisions is conference record. It's really not difficut or complicated ... pretty easy to "go there now."

If we win one more game and finish 10-6 , it would make us 7-5 in conference play. The 10 wins eliminate the Jets and the 7-5 conference record would give us the tei breaker of the lower of the two seeds Cin and Pitt.

Pitt is 4-6 with 2 conf games left if they lose the Cinn game , they finish at best 9-7 and 5-7 in conference. So they are behind us in both win -loss and conf record.

If Cinn wins out , they could tie us at 10-6 and tie us in conf at 7-5. So Pitt would be out and Ind and Cinn go to the next tie breaker to see who gets the 5 seed.

So bottom line is 10 wins and the Jets are out. The only way Pitt could get in is to finish ahead of Cinn record wise. They cannot pass us unless they beat Balt for the division. If this happens , Balt loses two of three and loses the division to Cinn or Pitt , I guess it is possible that we could get left out at 10-6 as Balt would have a btterf conference frecord than us. So I guees it is possible 10 wins doesn't get us in and maybe at least , although I was wrong about that , I've showed how it can happen.

Ten wins and we clinch a better record than the Jets, yes. But isn't the first tie-breaker the head-to-head? If the Jets finish 9-7 and we finish 9-7, the Jets are on top by virtue of their win against us, no?

I know there are formulas, and once you lay it out, it's pretty clear cut, but it's still complicated. We could technically have a three-way tie for the 5 and 6 spots, and because two of those teams are divisional opponents and because we haven't played either of them, the breakdown gets pretty hairy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More simply put than my post above , I don't think 10 wins is a clincher. If Balt losses 2 of 3 and loses out to Pitt or Cinn for the division , they would have the tie breaker over us as they already have 8 conference wins. Now if Pitt or Cinn can't win a tie breaker with Balt at 10-6 , then we are in with 10 wins.

Only 2 of the AFC North teams can finish above the Colts as it stands right now. The loser of the Bengals - Steelers game has no shot at their division, and lose the tiebreaker to the Colts. One more win or a Jets loss clinches it, I'm pretty sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes but jets can win out to get to 9-7 so colts win, jets loss or bengals and steelers losses gets us in

True but cant see Jets winning out, Still consider that cards are stacked in our favor & we hold own destiny in our hands, couldnt asjk for more right now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only 2 of the AFC North teams can finish above the Colts as it stands right now. The loser of the Bengals - Steelers game has no shot at their division, and lose the tiebreaker to the Colts. One more win or a Jets loss clinches it, I'm pretty sure.

Actually, what if Pitt and Cincy win all of their games and tie in their head to head meeting? Each would then be at 9 -6 -1 and if we lose out, we'd be 9-7. Jets win out, and they are 9 -7. Both of us would be behind a 9 -6 -1 team, no?

And of course, if Pitt and Cincy win all their games and one team beats the other in head to head, then we must lose all, and Jets win all for us to fall short to Jets and Cincy/Pitt winner. Bottom line-

We still have business to take care of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, what if Pitt and Cincy win all of their games and tie in their head to head meeting? Each would then be at 9 -6 -1 and if we lose out, we'd be 9-7. Jets win out, and they are 9 -7. Both of us would be behind a 9 -6 -1 team, no?

And of course, if Pitt and Cincy win all their games and one team beats the other in head to head, then we must lose all, and Jets win all for us to fall short to Jets and Cincy/Pitt winner. Bottom line-

We still have business to take care of.

Good point. I don't usually even think about ties, they are so rare (only 1 this year out of 201 games played), but it is still a possibility. So one measley Jets loss plus a W/L senario in the Cin/Pit matchup... Or just one more Colts win, and its the playoffs, baby!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just hope they hold on to the 5th seed and Baltimore ends up with the 4th. I think beating Baltimore in that wild card game, especially the way Baltimore is playing right now, is very doable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just hope they hold on to the 5th seed and Baltimore ends up with the 4th. I think beating Baltimore in that wild card game, especially the way Baltimore is playing right now, is very doable.

agreed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For whatever reason, my last few films have been controversial ones. I didn't plan it that way. It just sort of happened, but I will admit that I have always been drawn to provocative subjects ever since I can remember. My latest review called "Confirmation" a 2016 political drama directed by Rick Famuyiwa slides right into that hot button territory as well. I promise to behave myself here & only establish broad brush strokes that the director portrays in this 1 hour & 50 minute piece of cinema, but it will be extremely difficult to restrain my true feelings since I graduated from high school in 1991 & remember very well the US Senate Hearings on Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas on TV & the sexual harassment charges leveled against him by Anita Hill, a former subordinate under Thomas's supervision at the EEOC [Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.]   In the interest of full disclosure, I'm gonna be honest with my audience & say that I believed Miss Hill's testimony back then & I never thought Mr. Thomas should have been confirmed to replace Thurgood Marshall either & the director has this same slant or bias in this production too. Watching this flick took me right back to 1991 during the George H.W. Bush Administration who submitted Thomas's name for consideration to the highest judicial office in the land. It was almost bizarre to see younger versions of anchormen Tom Brokaw & Dan Rather, Andrea Mitchell, & footage of Peter Jennings & Tim Russert, former host of "Meet The Press" both deceased now. The picture does a nice job of blending fictional testimony scenes from Hill & Thomas with archival news footage from CBS, NBC, ABC, & CNN. It's odd to see the primitive nature of TVs & computers back then long before iPhones & iMacs were present in every office in America.    In a nutshell, the movie is divided between 2 sides: Those who believed that Clarence Thomas is being railroaded by groups like NOW [Natl. Organization Of Women] simply because he leans toward the Conservative side on issues & Those on the Progressive side who believed that Anita Hill was sexually harassed by her boss who made several unwanted advances & lewd sexual references toward her based solely on her appearance & physical attractiveness as he saw it refusing to change his behavior after numerous requests to do so.    Plotline: The year is 1991 & Clarence Thomas [Wendell Pierce] has been nominated to fill a vacant seat on the Supreme Court. The chairmen of these Senate Hearing is Joe Biden [Greg Kinnear] from Delaware. The process appears to going along smoothly for Thomas until a current professor of law at The University of Oklahoma named Anita Hill [Kerry Washington] decides to reluctantly testify before Congress in the Senate. I won't bore my audience with Congressional names or the staffers who work on their behalf on both sides of the DC aisle other then to say this: The bulk of this film focuses on the testimony of Hill & how Thomas reacts to the allegations leveled against him.    Clarence Thomas's supporters somehow convince Biden to deliver his testimony first & while giving his opening remarks Thomas claims that these sexual harassment allegations are false, unfounded, & that he treated all his female employees with respect. When Anita Hill is allowed to testify before the Senate, she tells the body assembled there in a long, prepared, typed statement that Mr. Thomas constantly tried to ask her out socially, bragged about the size of his organ, talked about several adult films he had seen despite making her feel very uneasy, & that on 1 occasion he made a deplorable joke about hair from a private region of his body being found on the aluminum can itself. As you listen to Hill say these words out loud, it dawns on you that all the members in these judiciary hearings are men with zero women in elected office at this point. Think about that reality for a second.    Despite the fact that Anita Hill is well educated, well read, articulate, a credible witness, & very bright; the following doubts & allegations are brought against her testimony: Why did it take her so long to bring these sexual harassment charges forward? Why did she continue to have contact with Thomas? Why didn't she just talk about misconduct sooner & bring formal charges against him? Is she just looking for simple fame, fortune, & publicity? Was she secretly attracted to him & Thomas declined her advances so therefore she wants revenge now? Did she get some of her crazy harassment allegations from books like "The Exorcist?" Did she develop a secret, sexual crush on Thomas known as erotomania like she's some sort of mental deviant?    As you watch the absurd theories cast against Miss Hill by senators who believe this is an unfair witch hunt against Clarence Thomas, it makes you upset or it made me furious rather than none of these male Congressmen ever considered the possibility that men in positions of authority could use their stature & influence to manipulate the situation to their advantage thru unwanted advances or even intercourse because they write evaluations on their subordinates that they oversee, they determine a women's future thru promotions or recommendations; they can blackball or prevent females from working at other law firms or any law firm rather ever again. Could a women studying law really saw no to her boss's advances back in 1991 with the 'boys will be boys' mentality? Sadly no, not really. Not if you wanna advance or climb up the legal ladder anyway. In addition, this really ticked me off. Anita Hill's claims of harassment weren't taken seriously in the Senate chamber because she was a black woman instead of a white woman stating these allegations against Thomas. What?!! That's absurd! Why should the color of the woman's skin even matter. That's freaking ridiculous & very insulting.    You wanna know how Clarence Thomas refutes these unsettlingly serious allegations? He calls the whole backlash situation against him a "high tech lynching." Excuse me? You have got to be joking. So let me get this straight, a former employee under your supervision who happen to be black just like you has committed a vile act of racist cruelty against Thomas simply because he was asked several times to stop engaging in lewd conversations about her appearance & Clarence claims that what Anita did to him by testifying is the equivalent to a hate crime? I'm about ready to smack you sir. And the worst part is that nobody in the Senate challenges Thomas on such ludicrous remarks at all. Unbelievable.    Hill even agrees to take a lie detector test to prove that she is telling the truth. However, many who oppose her assertions claim that the results are meaningless because testers can make anybody pass polygraphs if they want. Ah no, first you establish a base line with false responses & then you monitor a person's heart rate & breathing patterns for erratic fluctuations. The only individuals who can pass a polygraph are psychopaths & serial killers with no appreciation for right or wrong & no impulse control. Lie detector tests are almost impossible to fake as long as the professional examiner knows what the hades they are doing.    The picture ends with Miss Hill returning back to Oklahoma. She is tired of fighting against unfounded innuendo about her reputation & character assassination tactics. Once back teaching, she takes comfort & solace in all the letters she receives from women who thank her for opening their eyes against sexual harassment. Clarence Thomas becomes a Supreme Court Justice as we all know.    This film does make think twice about what you say to your female colleagues in the workplace as it should. Can you say some looks nice today without it coming across as inappropriate? I guess it depends on a person's tone, sincerity, & maintaining eye contact without visually wondering to other sections of a co-workers anatomy I guess. Lets roll with a B- on "Confirmation" because Hill & Thomas's performances were quite good & we never see Clarence believe he ever did anything wrong, even though he claims that he can't look his son in the eye anymore while undergoing the confirmation process anyway.    If I ever said anything that made a woman feel uncomfortable about her appearance or attractiveness, I'm sorry.        "Who's to say what's for me to say...be...do
      Cause a big nothing it'll be for me
      The land of opportunity
      The golden chance for me
      My future looks so bright
      Now I think I've seen the light"  
    • He has enough money if he has that big of a problem with this country he can fund a ticket to any country of his choice that he cares enough to stand up for. I am sure he has a passport so it's just a matter of taking care of his finances and get on a jet and fly the hades out of here.
    • You pretty much summed up my thoughts as well. It's hard for me to comprehend why he chose this way to made his voice be heard.
    • I believe they have amended the rules to 'touching the passer'......
  • Welcome New Members

    • Hi And Welcome! You can create a thread after you have 10 approved posts.  When you first join, you can post 5 replies per 24 hours so, it takes 48 hours at minimum before you can post.   Apologies for the inconvenience but it keeps our drive by trouble making to a minimum.
    • Hello Colts Nation   I am a long time reader of this forum but never really participated in comments but hope to join in this season.   Been a Colts fan since the 'move' when i lived in Carmel.  Actually liked the Colts before that when i was younger but it was the uniform that appealed to me.    I am wondering how do I start a topic in a forum?  Do I have to have so many replies before approved?  I tried to find the rules topic on this but no luck.   Thanks   Edit: I finally found the section on the rules to posting.  :-)
  • Members

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.