Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

SteelCityColt

Covering Tight Ends?

8 posts in this topic

Obviously there has been a quite a large shift in recent years to Tight Ends being more than just blockers to being an active and key part of the receiving corp. Quite often commentators cite their success down to this mismatches their size and speed causes. Too big for CBs, too quick for linebackers.

My question is how come no one has come up with a solution to this? On watching games they'll show a reply of the tight end making a big play, point out the LB can't cover him but they never say what they should have done on D.I know people like Gronk are just on another level but even quite run of the mill tight ends can cause teams issues.

I'm surprised that we've never seen a tight end come out on D to cover his opposite number, fight fire with fire if you will. I'm not suggesting it for every down, but in specific positional situations, e.g. Red Zone or 3rd and Medium it could help take away a easy option for the QB if the man covering the tight end can at least match him physically.

Not suggesting that it's a lightbulb idea, just a idle thought I've had when it gets highlighted in games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally....get a big SS; Adrian Wilson, William Moore, Kam Chancellor, put them in the box and have them play press coverage. For one it puts an extra guy in the box so it's harder to run, and in theory it's easier for a 6'3 230 lb Safety to cover a TE than a 6'1 245 lb Linebacker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally....get a big SS; Adrian Wilson, William Moore, Kam Chancellor, put them in the box and have them play press coverage. For one it puts an extra guy in the box so it's harder to run, and in theory it's easier for a 6'3 230 lb Safety to cover a TE than a 6'1 245 lb Linebacker.

In theory yes, but on the whole I didn't think safeties were that big so this might not be an option for every team, wouldn't bringing one into the box leave the deep exposed, unless you mean some type of 3 safety formation?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In theory yes, but on the whole I didn't think safeties were that big so this might not be an option for every team, wouldn't bringing one into the box leave the deep exposed, unless you mean some type of 3 safety formation?

Defenses don't always have their safeties playing deep zones. I'd have my FS roam the deep middle and help out whichever CB has the more difficult matchup in the event of his man getting by him. Either that or you play a type of 3 deep zone. You are correct though, most teams do not have personnel to do this, but with the problems these TEs create I'd definitely be looking for a big safety that can play man to man.

Looking at the safeties entering the draft next year....a ton of them are 6'1 or taller. I'm no scout, but I do like the measureables on these guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Defenses don't always have their safeties playing deep zones. I'd have my FS roam the deep middle and help out whichever CB has the more difficult matchup in the event of his man getting by him. Either that or you play a type of 3 deep zone. You are correct though, most teams do not have personnel to do this, but with the problems these TEs create I'd definitely be looking for a big safety that can play man to man.

Looking at the safeties entering the draft next year....a ton of them are 6'1 or taller. I'm no scout, but I do like the measureables on these guys.

Although measureables do not always translate into NFL success, these safeties have me excited as well. I'm hoping we can grab one with a good feel for our system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you both, certainly s a good year for drafting D and we certainly need a safety.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I had it my way, William Moore will become a FA and we sign him. I don't know what he'd cost but I'd pay a good 8 mil per year of Irsay's money for him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Posts

    • How bad was the 2013 offseason?
      Reading this recap really is frustrating when you consider the opportunities missed. The Werner pick was the killer, I remember that Dustin (correctly) at the time pointed out his lack of explosive athleticism, it does make you wonder why he was rated so highly on teams' boards. Laugh in hindsight if you will but there were mocks out there putting him in the top 5!    Holmes/Hughes/Thornton I'm a little more forgiving on as there was certainly potential there. Holmes never seemed to be 100% fit during his time here, but even then as Superman said, there was no competition really for the C job. Well aside from that dog and pony show of Grigson wanting Harrison to start...    Thornton could still be a success story, especially if the offseason fluff pieces about him slimming are credible I do think he could be very good in a more ZBS. Hughes had flashes but never lived up to his physical tools. That seems to be the overriding issue with this FO, taking players who have the physical tools but need coaching up... but we've been terrible at coaching players. Maybe that changes with the wholesale coaching changes. I do think this is the first season we get to see a true Pagano staff. There better be some improvement as we've taken players again this year that are raw and need refining (Green and Ridgeway IMO).    The FA moves I think are easy to criticise with the benefit of hindsight. Cherilus you can question given his knee condition and the amount paid to him. It smacks of a knee jerk move to try and throw money at the O-line to fix it. Same with Thomas, but I think we were very unlucky with his injuries. Again though when you look at RJF/Toler it's like we're trying to find talent through trial and error. Of course this isn't the case but it does make you question the quality of player evaluation.         
    • what happy to billings?
      Never saw this coming with Billings, like another poster said, it happens every draft. I admit that I was on the want Billings bandwagon. I will definitely keep a close eye on his play this season.   
    • Other teams drafts
      I think my assessment backs up my opinion that he has been mediocre. Posted some stats that don`t look like Pro bowl material, but I am smart enough to realize every QB that played in the 2016 PB was a replacement. 2015 22nd ranked passer with the best RB in the NFL. Enough said, good day sir!
    • Grading the current roster
      What are you talking about? He had the 4th highest made% in the league.
    • Grading the current roster
      Wow that's suprisingly accurate.
  • Topics

  • Welcome New Members

  • Members

    • CR91

      CR91 3,942

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • will426

      will426 394

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HorseFly

      HorseFly 108

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • crestmount

      crestmount 122

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ar1888

      ar1888 234

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • macho GRANDE

      macho GRANDE 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • gacker65

      gacker65 119

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chrisfarley

      chrisfarley 484

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SevaColt

      SevaColt 21

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • scousecolt

      scousecolt 78

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.