Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

HtownColt

Bob Kravitz on Freeney

49 posts in this topic

That's what I see.

Mathis and Freeney are still getting double teams

They dont double Jerry Hughes..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I see.

Mathis and Freeney are still getting double teams

They dont double Jerry Hughes..

Agreed...thing is I'd like to see Freeney stay...he's about to be 33 and the chances of him getting picked up for his current pay is slim to none...like super slim. I hope he agrees to a smaller contract with us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup.

Last week one play in particular stood out. The Bills ran Spiller towards Freeney's side and Freeney drove his double (might have been triple, can't remember) block into the back field forcing Spiller to re-direct and was tackled for a loss by another Colts defender.

Freeney doesn't get the credit on the stat sheet, but he was the sole reason on that play that it was a loss of yards for the Bills.

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup.

Last week one play in particular stood out. The Bills ran Spiller towards Freeney's side and Freeney drove his double (might have been triple, can't remember) block into the back field forcing Spiller to re-direct and was tackled for a loss by another Colts defender.

Freeney doesn't get the credit on the stat sheet, but he was the sole reason on that play that it was a loss of yards for the Bills.

Yeah, he bull rushed two guys well into the backfield, and should have drawn a holding penalty, and without that, we don't get that play stopped as effectively. I think it was Freeman who came in and did clean up duty on that one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good article.

I agree the numbers aren't there, but he's played better as of late. He does probably have the most holding penalites go uncalled in the history of the NFL. lol

His pass coverage is atrocious, and he takes himself out of run defense by strictly rushing the passer. This is nothing new, but he does have only one more tackle than Reggie Wayne. lol, and I still love him as a Colt.

I say if we keep Freeney, his contract has got to be heavily incentive laden. He's had his paydays already, and I don't see Grigson is going to offer anywhere near that kind of money next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Freeney has been good, but as the article said, he has been playing sometimes injured and sometimes without Mathis and he is adjusting to a new position. With time, I think he will get more settled into the defense and learn his role. Give him another offseason with the coaches and then let's see what he can do. Plus, I've heard that it can take a team up to 3 years to make a full transition from 4-3 to 3-4, depending on how keen they are in what they do. We saw the Texans do it in one year and go from worst to first, but that is rarely the case. Give him and the team time to adjust to their new roles.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When Freeney plays I think he's played pretty well. So, even if he's not sacking a QB, at least he's being disruptive to the offense.

Fine.

But.... he's not healthy that much. He can't seem to stay on the field for very long. I don't think we're getting enough bang for our buck. His status next year will be an interesting off-season story line to watch....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what would be a reasonable contract to get dwight back 4 years 25 mil

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last week one play in particular stood out. The Bills ran Spiller towards Freeney's side and Freeney drove his double (might have been triple, can't remember) block into the back field forcing Spiller to re-direct and was tackled for a loss by another Colts defender.

That play was ridiculous. He turned Cordy Glenn (340+ lbs) into a ragdoll on that play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I knew there would be somebody who would insult Kravitz before I scrolled to the bottom. I don't always like what the guy writes either, but I liked this article.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Freeney 's conditioning is second to none. Nobody is more of a pro than him. I wish he and Mathis were 5 years younger. We really would be building a beast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Freeney has been ok this year. And he has definitely had one of the best careers in the NFL, for a DE.

Unfortunately I don't think we should resign him. With the money we should try for a younger pass rusher. Or keep working with Hughes who has shown he can start opposite of Mathis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what would be a reasonable contract to get dwight back 4 years 25 mil

I'd probably be okay with something like that.....

I want him to retire a Colt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 year deal tops or I don't want him

I don't too much care how long the deal is. I'm more worried about the guaranteed money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Freeney has been ok this year. And he has definitely had one of the best careers in the NFL, for a DE.

Unfortunately I don't think we should resign him. With the money we should try for a younger pass rusher. Or keep working with Hughes who has shown he can start opposite of Mathis.

I'd prefer Freeney on one leg (a la 2009 SB) to Hughes. Every day, all day. Hughes remains to be an indiciplined non factor with a little ST talent. If we are going to dump Freeney, we need to draft high.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I see.

Mathis and Freeney are still getting double teams

They dont double Jerry Hughes..

Couldn't agree with you any more. They are gameplaning against freeney and mathis and i think its pretty safe to say hughes just cant get to the quarterback. if either of those guys were getting single covered on the line their sack totals would be a lot higher. i just dont see it in hughes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd prefer Freeney on one leg (a la 2009 SB) to Hughes. Every day, all day. Hughes remains to be an indiciplined non factor with a little ST talent. If we are going to dump Freeney, we need to draft high.

exactly. hughes is a bust. freeney has made this defense for years and is still an amazing talent

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When did this turn into a Jerry Hughes bashing thread? some of you are ridiculous with it, the guy has 4 sacks and 27 tackles in just 6 starts at 24 years old. Now for comparisons sake since every time Freeneys name comes up Hughes seems to work his way into the post as well, Freeney has 2 sacks......2 sacks in 9 starts and 6 total tackles, Does anyone really think Grigson kept Freeney around for that kind of production or because oh he draws double teams? The NFL is a production business and Freeney has not done that, which wouldn't be so bad if he was young and in a new defense, reality is he isn't and Hughes has outproduced (and outplayed) him in a new defense. I'd like for him to retire a Colt but he would only be a situational pass rusher (just like he has always been) on a reasonable contract thats short

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Freeney shouldn`t be starting, just used as a situational pass rusher of which he is no longer very usefull at that.

He is being replaced a lot thankfully, player developement is the right way to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I say if we keep Freeney, his contract has got to be heavily incentive laden. He's had his paydays already, and I don't see Grigson is going to offer anywhere near that kind of money next year.

You just missed the point of that article... completely.

Take a look at the play mentioned above where, statistically, Freeney did absolutely nothing. But, in reality, he forced a run back, and caused a negative rush on a very explosive back. The moment you start saying that you are going to pay a guy for sacks or tackles, or whatever, is the moment his focus becomes less about making the defensive unit stronger, and making sure he gets his numbers.

I'd be completely satisfied if Freeney ended his career here averaging 3-4 sacks a season for the next 3-4 years, if that meant that he was getting doubled and allowing others to get numbers. The whole gist of that article is statistics don't always tell the whole story.

You know the times when Freeney or Mathis fly through and get to the QB just after he released the ball? If they rushed the QB, and he saw them coming and tried to get something to happen, and threw an interception, NOTHING shows on the stats sheets in their favor. But the reality is, had that QB had 1-2 more seconds to scan the defense, he most likely wouldn't have made the throw.

Point being, looking purely at numbers is NEVER going to give you a full story. So paying for those numbers is just as *ic as using them as a measuring stick for his success.

As to his contract, I'd be willing to bet that if they want him back, they're going to try to sign him to a deal similar to Robert. My only issue is we'd still have a former first rounder in Hughes riding the bench. But, he has been getting some time this season and looking good. Perhaps having three pass rushers isn't all that bad, either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You just missed the point of that article... completely.

I'd be completely satisfied if Freeney ended his career here averaging 3-4 sacks a season for the next 3-4 years, if that meant that he was getting doubled and allowing others to get numbers. The whole gist of that article is statistics don't always tell the whole story.

Lol, I read the same article you did.

Stats don't tell the whole story, but they make up about 75% of the story, and everyone gets judged on them .

You can say you don't care about numbers, but if he had 16 sacks, you'd be making a huge deal out of it.

Freeney has 6 tackles and 1 sack in 9 games played.

It would be great if he's pulling double coverage all the time and allowing other to get a ton of sacks, but that's not really the case. Plus, he's still being paid more than double what he should be getting. For example:

Mathis gets paid less, has played less games and almost 4 times the production. I love Freeney, but let's be real here. Heck, Jerry Hughes has 4 sacks and everyone makes fun of him constantly because of his stats!

I'm just glad you aren't the GM of this team! lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bringing Freeney back next season would be a colossal mistake. Thats exactly why they won't bring him back. Freeney will still get a good contract offer from some 4-3 team where he can focus on nothing but rushing the QB, but it certainly won't be here in Indy.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And no mention of the play where the 2nd string TE blocked Freeney into the ground with no help what so ever.....

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what would be a reasonable contract to get dwight back 4 years 25 mil

I think he wont take anything less than $8 mil. a year and if we feel strongly about him, 3 yrs. $25 mil. is not out of the realm of possibility, given the inflated free agency market. Not all guys are going to be like Reggie Wayne, IMO. In the long run, going for younger legs will do us good.

We might be able to get equivalent production with guys like Anthony Spencer and Manny Lawson if we sign them to free agent contracts if Freeney's price is too high.

A primarily 4-3 team like the Falcons or Saints would easily shell out $10 mil. per year for him, so we cannot shortchange him because he will have options for a higher average, if his best option would be a 3 yr. contract with another team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cassius Vaughn needs to go! This guy has to the worst CB in the NFL. I got to watch him when he played here in my hometown for the Broncos and he sucked that is why they got rid of him. He falls for every fake or juke and leaves receivers wide open just look at last week against the Bills. I no longer want to see this guy on the field for us. Please let Davis come back and stay healthy. The colts need help at CB bad. Butler has done a nice job but still isn't a starter in my book. I would hate to see what Manning would do to our secondary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would hate to see what Manning would do to our secondary.

Exactly what Brady did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he wont take anything less than $8 mil. a year and if we feel strongly about him, 3 yrs. $25 mil. is not out of the realm of possibility, given the inflated free agency market. Not all guys are going to be like Reggie Wayne, IMO. In the long run, going for younger legs will do us good.

We might be able to get equivalent production with guys like Anthony Spencer and Manny Lawson if we sign them to free agent contracts if Freeney's price is too high.

A primarily 4-3 team like the Falcons or Saints would easily shell out $10 mil. per year for him, so we cannot shortchange him because he will have options for a higher average, if his best option would be a 3 yr. contract with another team.

do you really see the colts coughing up 8 mil a year

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And no mention of the play where the 2nd string TE blocked Freeney into the ground with no help what so ever.....

Does that undo all the good?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't too much care how long the deal is. I'm more worried about the guaranteed money.

^ ^ This. And make it cap friendly whether he plays it out, or leaves/get cut. ^ ^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly what Brady did.

Heard that! And that is the scary thing cause the way things are going we could play them in the wildcard game here in Denver and I would love nothing more than to see the Colts take them out but we can't have Vaughn on the field he needs to ride the bench. I am glad that we are getting Davis back and he needs to pick it up as well and show why we used a 2nd round pick on him!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

do you really see the colts coughing up 8 mil a year

Not if they can get Anthony Spencer from the Cowboys for the same amount of money, he is more of a natural fit there and is a better run stopper, IMO.

I think we should sign key secondary guys in free agency before offering contracts to OLBs/DLs/OLs. That might also tell us how the money should be spent. We may be able to afford him based on how things transpire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not if they can get Anthony Spencer from the Cowboys for the same amount of money, he is more of a natural fit there and is a better run stopper, IMO.

I think we should sign key secondary guys in free agency before offering contracts to OLBs/DLs/OLs. That might also tell us how the money should be spent. We may be able to afford him based on how things transpire.

i would like us to sign o-lineman instead of drafting them because drafting o-lineman dont benefit the time until 2-3 years down the road. id like us to go safety in the draft prerferbly eric reid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i would like us to sign o-lineman instead of drafting them because drafting o-lineman dont benefit the time until 2-3 years down the road. id like us to go safety in the draft prerferbly eric reid.

I agree but there are considerable deficiencies in the secondary that I think a combination of free agency and drafting will be necessary to rectify it. OLs - 1 or 2 good free agent pickups should do.

Rest can be drafted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree but there are considerable deficiencies in the secondary that I think a combination of free agency and drafting will be necessary to rectify it. OLs - 1 or 2 good free agent pickups should do.

Rest can be drafted.

well with 40 mil to work with you know grigs will be signing like crazy lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does that undo all the good?

Nope.

But how long have people been harping on his constant double teams? 5-7years?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 1970 and 2006. Colts were SB champs, NFL Network did these two years.  My two favorite years as a lifetime Colts fan. A lot of players and coaches to be proud of. I know to most, they don't belong together but I can't help it: both were my Colts, both wore the horseshoe. Unitas, Jones, Peyton and Luck. Moore, Mitchell, Dickey, James and Gore. John Mackey and Dallas Clark. The list goes on. To be a fan for all these years has been rewarding and frustrating. But I'm glad to have been a Colts fan and look forward to possibility seeing a team that ranks up there with some of the best that has ever worn the horseshoe. It may take a little time but I'm hopeful! C-O-L-T-S Colts!!!!
    • The mugshot will be a meme sensation!
    • Yep. We are going backwards and PG saw that and wants out. This teams has big contracts wrapped up in two aging guys Al and Monta and they are awful for this team. By the time you re-sign Teague to his new more expensive contract and depending on what you do with CJ who will be up for a bigger contract you really don't have much room to add anyone....even a shooter like Riddick might not be affordable. Its almost impossible to compete with the Cavs who are like 30 million over the cap when you have an owner like Simon and when you have to over-pay mediocre talent just to come play with you. I do think this team under-achieved but I'm not going to pretend its even close to contending. We are a long ways off from that and I'm sure PG realizes that....and its going to be very tough to convince him we can help him win it all and we will finally pair him with another superstar when we bring in Monta Ellis and say there you go Paul...there's your star upgrade...go compete. I'm sure he believes if he is in LA it will be easier to convince free agents to come sign and win something with him....after all...nowadays it takes 3 or 4 stars to compete with the Cavs and Warriors.
    • I personally thought his first game against Tennessee was his best of the season and top 5 maybe top 3 of his career. I went down to watch that game in person. Sweet seats in the lower bowl.    Luck  came out blazing. It was clear from the beginning there was an emphasis on getting the ball out quickly. And boy did he ever. 3 step drops. 5 step drops. Ball coming out on time. Throwing to spots and hitting receivers as soon as they came out of their breaks.  Back should fades...   Near perfection. Plus I think Doyle dropped a TD just before halftime or he may have flirted with a perfect rating.  Was well worth the trip down to see Luck put on a clinic...
    • If we are close to anything, its close to not being a playoff team. We almost weren't this year.
  • Welcome New Members

    •   Sorry to keep harping on the Irish thing, but did you know the horseshoe has seven points on it?  (The Colts horseshoe, anyway.  Actual shoes for horses depend on the farrier).   Seven is considered a lucky number...  Lucky.  Luck.  I'm telling you, you picked the right team to root for.   7    
    •   Don't hold Boston against the Irish.  It's not our fault.    We love our green, which makes Indiana a tearmann.   I love it that you chose to root for an underdog instead of the Pats.  I don't think it's coincidence that you became a fan around the time Luck got drafted to the Colts.  That's providence.     Horseshoe?  Luck?  Four-leaf clover?  Come on.  Hoosier Hospitality has roots in Irish fun-lovery.  If you're lucky enough to be Irish, you're lucky enough!  May the luck of the Irish be with you!  
  • Members

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.