Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

cmgww

Time for a little perspective...

23 posts in this topic

For everyone complaining about Luck, Arians, etc. Wake up! This team was not supposed to do squat this season! They are built from spare parts, rookies, and a few solid veterans. Yes, yesterday's win was "ugly"...you think the great #18 didn't have clunkers in his days here? He had plenty! As a MVP veteran he had off days. Look back at some games he threw 2 picks, maybe 250 yards, and the Colts still ground out a win. 2009 comes to mind. 14-12 over Jax, 18-14 over a then terrible 49ers team at home, 20-17 over a bad Houston team....

What do you all expect? 35-0 every week? Luck is rookie playing behind a terrible pass blocking line, without a full deck (Collie, Fleener) of skill guys, and he has a couple of not great games. And all of a sudden it is "what's wrong with Luck? Is he regressing? No, he is a rookie. A darn good one, but a rookie nonetheless. Yesterday he got enough done to get the win. And the D and STs helped too. He did look a bit wonky yeaterday....but Manning had plenty of those types of games in his run here. Lighten up and look at the big picture, folks. We are 7-4 and in the driver's seat in terms of making the playoffs, and no one except a few of us fans on here saw this coming...and i don't want a bunch of "I said they would win 9-10 games back in August"...bc i am on here enough to know you are lying. A few people reached for that, but not many, and they were laughed at. Enjoy...the...ride

7 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

people are happy about 7 and 4 but we want luck to play at higher level. It gets annoying when an rg3 fan comes up and says rg3 has thrown 4tds ect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not complaining. It's amazing that we're 7-4. But at the same time, there's nothing wrong with pointing out that it was an ugly win yesterday, and that Luck still has some work to do.... Those are honest and true assessments.

I'd actually be more upset if the team were completely happy with the performance yesterday (which I'm sure they aren't). That would tell me they aren't interested in getting better. That's not really a winning mentality.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that we're in the driver's seat for a playoff spot with all the development we still have to do isn't a cause for complaint, it's a cause for celebration.

3 times we've been blown out this year, and we're 3-0 in the bounceback games that follow it. This is a team that learns from its mistakes and develops. We're not where we need to be, but we're far ahead of where the script says we should be.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

people are happy about 7 and 4 but we want luck to play at higher level. It gets annoying when an rg3 fan comes up and says rg3 has thrown 4tds ect.

Luck has played great, and who cares what the RG3 lovers are saying. The guy literally dinks and dunks down the field every game with a few longer passes sprinkled in. If those people can not see the obvious and blatant differences in why Luck has been way better so far, then they don't have an ounce of football knowledge in the brains. Its funny those same people talked about how Bobby 3 had a better team and better weapons around him at the start of the season, but now all of a sudden they want to say that Luck has the better team and that is completely ridiculous. Forget about the Skip Bayless followers out there that actually listen to his nonsense because anybody with 1 functioning brain cell can see that Luck has done way more for his team than Bobby 3 has done for his.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RGIII doesnt dink and dunk down the field...he has a legitimate arm....I'm a Colts fan all day but enough with the lies.....

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This Perspective, which Angle you looking from? When you take a Chance, ever Wonder who you took it from?

Idk lol, got Bored. But I'm not complaining. I predicted a 7 or 9 Win season so this isn't a surprise to me. But we do have some areas we need to work on. Nothing wrong with looking at the Good AND Bad of your Team

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I predicted 3-5 wins and stats more like Peyton's first year, so overall, I'm happy.

I also have no problems with criticising Luck or BA or anyone. Luck does have obvious areas that need work, but folks lose perspective when they seem to almost describe him as a bust of some kind. Just makes no sense. Same with BA. Not perfect certainly, but some want to fire him? Again, perspective lost IMO.

Also, RGIII is having a better year thus far than Luck IMO, even considering the better talent surrounding him. I have no problem admitting that. But if one turns out to be Brady and one Manning, who cares? I'm happy for Washington and happy for us.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

people are happy about 7 and 4 but we want luck to play at higher level. It gets annoying when an rg3 fan comes up and says rg3 has thrown 4tds ect.

That's the problem, who gives a rats if a RG3 fan wants to argue that his QB is better. If that's your concern you can turn the argument on his head with superior football knowledge and if these people are completely devoid of it then the argument is pointless anyway. There is plenty of angles you can use other than passing stats, especially since RG3 hasnt won more games Luck.

Luck has the better record

Has broken more records

He can rush nearly as well as RG3 but can actually take the punishment or just break tackles in the pocket and still pass

Luck can put the team on his back and win

Luck gets his passing yards with a higher degree of difficulty because the play book is full of long developing routes, not screens , slants, and crossing routes.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Luck is doing historically well for a rookie QB with a practically new team minus Wayne, Brown, Castonzo, Link, Fili, Mookie, Freeney, Mathis, Angerer, Powers, Bethea, Vinateri, and Pat.

Our team really shouldn't be winning the games we are winning. But we have benefited from a easy schedule.

Pagano, Arians, Manusky have all been doing a great job so far with less talent.

Grigson should get a lot of credit for what he has done in his first year of working with a injury ridden/ cap stricken team.

Luck is playing well and has made some mistakes but fans don't really think of him as a rookie because he never acts like a rookie.

As much as I think the defense has played bad, we have been playing well. We haven't given up a ton of points except for the Pats, Packers, and Bears which are the very good teams right now.

3 of our 4 losses have come from the top teams in the league, which should be expected from a young team.

I am excited to even be mentioned for the playoffs this year because of how young we are, and how cap stricken we are. Do we have holes? Yes, but doesn't every team?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Luck is doing historically well for a rookie QB with a practically new team minus Wayne, Brown, Castonzo, Link, Fili, Mookie, Freeney, Mathis, Angerer, Powers, Bethea, Vinateri, and Pat.

Our team really shouldn't be winning the games we are winning. But we have benefited from a easy schedule.

Pagano, Arians, Manusky have all been doing a great job so far with less talent.

Grigson should get a lot of credit for what he has done in his first year of working with a injury ridden/ cap stricken team.

Luck is playing well and has made some mistakes but fans don't really think of him as a rookie because he never acts like a rookie.

As much as I think the defense has played bad, we have been playing well. We haven't given up a ton of points except for the Pats, Packers, and Bears which are the very good teams right now.

3 of our 4 losses have come from the top teams in the league, which should be expected from a young team.

I am excited to even be mentioned for the playoffs this year because of how young we are, and how cap stricken we are. Do we have holes? Yes, but doesn't every team?

I actually totally forgot we lost to the Jets. So 2 out of our 4 wins have come against very good teams.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the problem, who gives a rats if a RG3 fan wants to argue that his QB is better. If that's your concern you can turn the argument on his head with superior football knowledge and if these people are completely devoid of it then the argument is pointless anyway. There is plenty of angles you can use other than passing stats, especially since RG3 hasnt won more games Luck.

Luck has the better record

Has broken more records

He can rush nearly as well as RG3 but can actually take the punishment or just break tackles in the pocket and still pass

Luck can put the team on his back and win

Luck gets his passing yards with a higher degree of difficulty because the play book is full of long developing routes, not screens , slants, and crossing routes.

It's really a green to red apple comparison. Two different players, two different systems. Similar to all the Brady v. Manning debates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RGIII doesnt dink and dunk down the field...he has a legitimate arm....I'm a Colts fan all day but enough with the lies.....

You can disagree all you want, but that still won't change the fact that their entire offense is predicated on screen passes and dump offs. He does throw the ball downfield some, but not even close to what Luck has to do in our offense.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's really a green to red apple comparison. Two different players, two different systems. Similar to all the Brady v. Manning debates.

Yep. And we're never going to hear the end of it...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's really a green to red apple comparison. Two different players, two different systems. Similar to all the Brady v. Manning debates.

That's a another good point to bring up, probably shut down the debate all together. Plus neither player affects the other so who cares.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. And we're never going to hear the end of it...

Funny thing is, it looks like we may be on the opposite end of it this time around. Luck has the W's and RGIII has the stats...

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't turn this into another luck verses Griffin debate. My point was, that even during the dominant Manning years, he had some pretty bad games too. sometimes against teams we were supposed to beat handily. in summary, I think Luck is being scrutinized way too much, at this point in his career. it's hard enough to follow a legend, but we all make it worse by pointing out every little flaw in his game

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can disagree all you want, but that still won't change the fact that their entire offense is predicated on screen passes and dump offs. He does throw the ball downfield some, but not even close to what Luck has to do in our offense.

That's the point.....it's not a fact......just because he checks down doesnt make it a dink OR dunk....he throws the ball downfield quite a bit and hes successful at it....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RGIII doesnt dink and dunk down the field...he has a legitimate arm......

Ummmm...yes he does.

He does have a great arm, and throws a terrific deep ball, but nobody can debate the fact that dink and dunk and yards after the catch are 95% of where his yards come from.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

STOP IT! READ MY ORIGINAL POST. I said nothing about RG3. Stop turning these threads into ticking matches about the two...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

people are happy about 7 and 4 but we want luck to play at higher level. It gets annoying when an rg3 fan comes up and says rg3 has thrown 4tds ect.

he may have done that but RG3 has more tools around him than Luck. I will take our record and Luck not throwing as many td's RG3. Luck has performed like i expected and am not disappointed in his performance on the field with this makeshift team. He get's not protected and has to scramble to much but he has kept drives alive in spots where you wouldn't think he coud so my reponse to RG3 threw 4 tds is Luck has a better winng %

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can disagree all you want, but that still won't change the fact that their entire offense is predicated on screen passes and dump offs. He does throw the ball downfield some, but not even close to what Luck has to do in our offense.

When Luck actually figures out how to lead a receiver and NOT throw it behind them the majority of the time his INT's will diminish and the YAC for our receivers will go through the roof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please post relevant to the topic to avoid having the thread go south or lost in the merger with another Vs thread. It is ok to add to the thread, but if the intent of the OP was to not have it go to a Andy Vs Bob, let's try to keep it free of that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    •       Dang right!  I already have my "Fire BPRoland!!" thread penned, and a twitchy finger on the Submit Reply button...      .   .   .      \     Just caught up on this thread... nice job folks.
    •   Going back to 2013 (because we can't count 2012 on Chuck's resume can we?) in the 1st Qtr the points differential breaks down as:   Positive: 27 Games Even: 11 Games Negative: 26 Games   Surprising... 
    • "Where'd you get it? [A dreamweaver hanging off a Kia Sorento's rear view mirror]. My ex girlfriend. Ex girlfriend? What happened? Was she cramping your style? Did she have too much [emotional] baggage? Did your mom hate her?"    "I'm Coby Bryant. Coby plays basketball. Yeah, I know. I just meant that I was the Coby Bryant of tennis...If you never called it quits [Darren], you could have been as good as Tiger. Tiger Woods plays golf. I know. I just meant like the Tiger Woods of tennis."    "Do you remember when I played with Dash Stevens? He was the worst. You're way better than him [brother]."   "Look at you...You still haven't made a move for her since the Fifth grade...You want me want me to hook you up with that sweet caboose?"    The following quotes are taken from a 2014 comedy that revolves around the sport of tennis. Doubles Men's tennis to be exact called "Break Point" directed by Jay Karas. This 1 hour & 30 minute picture is self explanatory with no real left turns in it that will surprise or astonish you overall. Here, in a nutshell, is the plot: An older brother named Jimmy [Jeremy Sisto] is a wise cracking alcoholic & womanizer who desperately wants to return to the professional tennis circuit. There's only 1 problem: Nobody & I do mean nobody wants to coach or partner with Jimmy on the court. He's burned a lot of bridges. You submit a name & there's a good chance Jimmy screwed them over in some form or fashion. Actually, to be more specific, Jimmy needs to win matches as an amateur in Palm Springs, Florida to even get a shot at competing in the US Open as an unranked player. Hades, Jimmy even did a horrible thing to his younger sibling named Darren [David Walton]. He dumped his doubles partner & teacher for an instructor named Dak Stevens that Darren never saw coming several years ago so there's definitely some bad blood there or at least a huge unresolved grudge anyway.    Darren is in his 30's, divorced, & a substitute teacher in NY City. Did I mention that an 11 yr old student named Barry [Joshua Rush] follows him around like a lost puppy on the cusp of Summer Vacation? What's funny is this kid is always grilling Darren with questions & my first quote at the start of this review is reminiscent of an expert on relationship advice except for the fact that Barry hasn't hit puberty yet. Barry lives with his grandmother since his biological mother can't raise her son or won't due to an addiction problem or she likes to party too much instead of being a responsible parent. Obviously Barry is looking for a father figure mentor in his life & he has chosen Barry to fill that rather large void. Darren reluctantly offers to teach Barry some pointers on tennis every Thursday afternoon. A tall undertaking since Barry's hand eye coordination appears to require considerable work.    Jimmy & Darren's dad is a local animal veterinarian named Jack played by the always believable JK Simmons.  Jack's primary assistant is a pretty blond woman named Heather [Amy Smart]. Darren has always had a serious crush on Heather since he was little growing up in the same neighborhood. He just gets tongue tied around her using any excuse to avoid her. Heather has always had an attraction to Darren as well & she finds his nervousness around her charming & cute. You know the links Darren will go to not get flustered near her like listening to Billy Joel in his car. Stuff like that.    Barry is a good kid who wears loud outfits with flamboyant colors on them. Jimmy, on the other hand, reminds us all of the legendary John McEnroe always complaining with judges & competitors over whether the ball landed in our out. I kept hearing that song by Asia 'Soul Survivor' in my head written about John's unlikely return from a devastating injury in his tennis career.    "...And from the wreckage I will arise
      Cast the ashes back in their eyes
      See the fire, I will defend
      Just keep on burning right to the end."    Basically, we all know what's gonna happen here. Darren & Jimmy show Barry that his mother's erratic behavior isn't his fault, how to stand up for himself, & that some people just can't be saved no matter how much you try to help them or make things right. They, the brothers, don't make the US Open cut, but Darren finally grows a backbone & asks Heather out at match point with her no good, high maintenance boyfriend sitting right next to her. A bold, & yet never before seen jolt of public confidence from Darren that paid off in the end. Sweet.    Break Point is far from sophisticated or even elaborate for that matter. I just liked it because of the 2 brothers & Barry. A motley crew that just works. It's just interesting to see a crass guy, a refined guy, & a naive kid with hardly any world experience hang out together & give 1 another a boost of confidence, self-worth, & testosterone. Let's roll with a B- here.        I like this Joe Walsh/James Gang song "Walk Away" since Jimmy preferred to walk away from responsibility or hard work when obstacles presented themselves until about the last 25 minutes of this flick.     [One of the best drum covers I have ever heard actually really tight.]     
    • Slow starts. We were leading by the end of Q1 on more occasions than we were losing last year. 
  • Members

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.