Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

deedub75

Colts were interested in Russell Wilson [Merge]

71 posts in this topic

Just saw on NFL Countdown that the Colts were gonna take Russell Wilson with the 92nd pick instead of TY Hilton but the Seahawks took him before we picked. It seems like they were serious about having a good backup QB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just saw on NFL Countdown that the Colts were gonna take Russell Wilson with the 92nd pick instead of TY Hilton but the Seahawks took him before we picked. It seems like they were serious about having a good backup QB

Interesting. I wonder how they planned on getting him on the field. I always thought Mr. Irrelevant was a waste of a pick since he'd never see the field, but I can understand wanting to groom a backup for the future.

Wilson is too good to ride the bench.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Grigson did come from Philly. Might not seem like a smart pick for this year but after he showed his stuff in a few preseasons we could have traded him away for a lot more than a 3rd round pick. Not saying I would have been happy about a 2nd QB in the first 3 rnds but maybe Grigson had a Kolb like situation in mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the source on this? I like Wilson, but I think he is too good to be on the bench, as others have said. With that said, it's difficult to say that if a guy is just on the bench. Today, no one would bench Tom Brady, but he was a backup at some point in his career, and coming out of the draft, few people would have said he is too good to sit on the bench.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we would have probably asked him to play another position. no way we were gonna waste a third round pick for a backup qb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i thought that was a good idea at the time. Especially if he was available in the 4th rd.

Much cheaper than what we are paying our backup now. A Superior 4 year ins. policy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, but no thanks.

Russell is too good to be a back up.

I could imagine it if we still had Peyton on the roster.

But Luck & Wilson on the same team, that would be a head-scratcher.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seeing how Collie is out for the season (and potentially permanently), the Hilton pick looks really really smart, in retrospect.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seeing how Collie is out for the season (and potentially permanently), the Hilton pick looks really really smart, in retrospect.

Indeed. We got a baller in T.Y.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought Skins taking Cousins was a stupid pick, so I'd have been upset if this had happened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just saw on NFL Countdown that the Colts were gonna take Russell Wilson with the 92nd pick instead of TY Hilton but the Seahawks took him before we picked. It seems like they were serious about having a good backup QB

Russell Wilson would have taken the starting job...

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't want it said we're not a friendly and welcoming board :P

Truthfully, most of the posters here are incredibly likeable and good sports. It's only a select few that make me want to come out from under my bridge. It's super comfy under there...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Truthfully, most of the posters here are incredibly likeable and good sports. It's only a select few that make me want to come out from under my bridge. It's super comfy under there...

We're all friendly here. Just remember this is a Colts forum and alot of posters wont like someone continually hating on Luck and loving Griffin III. Especially when it looks alot like trolling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Truthfully, most of the posters here are incredibly likeable and good sports. It's only a select few that make me want to come out from under my bridge. It's super comfy under there...

Ha lucky for you the billy GOAT ain't in these parts anymore. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was Adam Schefter who reported it. He named three other teams that were planning on drafting Wilson if the Seahawks didn't take him. I'm glad we took TY though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the source on this? I like Wilson, but I think he is too good to be on the bench, as others have said. With that said, it's difficult to say that if a guy is just on the bench. Today, no one would bench Tom Brady, but he was a backup at some point in his career, and coming out of the draft, few people would have said he is too good to sit on the bench.

It was Adam Schefter. He reported that three other teams were interested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Via footballguys.com

The Indianapolis Colts had interest in Seattle Seahawks QB Russell Wilson during the third round of the NFL Draft to serve as a backup to QB Andrew Luck before selecting WR T.Y. Hilton.

Interesting...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Among the teams interested in Wilson were the Eagles (who ended up taking Foles), us (took Hilton), and the Redskins (who took Cousins). This is all according to Adam Schefter's 10 Spot. Looks like Seattle was the best place for him. He wouldn't be starting here or in Washington and Philly is a big mess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mel Kiper has said if Russell Wilson wasn't 5' 10.5 " that he would have been right up there with Luck and RG3. Brees made it acceptable to have a 6 foot franchise QB. If Wilson keeps improving and impressing, he'll break that under 6 foot rule for future teams too. His short stature is the only glaring thing that made him drop in the draft. Current wisdom says you need 6'4" or taller and 225 or greater to get a QB that can see over lineman and deliver the ball. Brees, and now Wilson, are strong challengers to that wisdom. OTOH, Brees has regressed this season (at least in Int's). But that could be losing his HC/Playcaller too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Among the teams interested in Wilson were the Eagles (who ended up taking Foles), us (took Hilton), and the Redskins (who took Cousins). This is all according to Adam Schefter's 10 Spot. Looks like Seattle was the best place for him. He wouldn't be starting here or in Washington and Philly is a big mess.

I suspect he would have done very well in Philly, might have even bought Reid more time. Can't say I'm surprised that we were interested in him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly..... though, I suppose it's possible, I don't believe it.

I don't think in your first draft to build a team one would use the 92nd pick to take a back-up QB.

Honestly, it makes little sense to me.

The 5th round -- maybe. But not the 3rd. Too high a pick to use on a back-up QB when you're trying to take other players that will actually play. We had way too many other needs (still do!) This doesn't add up. It would be one thing if we were already a playoff quality team and we're looking for another final piece to a puzzle.... but we're a long ways from that and certainly were last April...

Wonder if Grigson will chime in? I wouldn't read too much into anything if he doesn't, but I'm the curious sort.....

Sometimes you hear something in the media and think that it doesn't add up..... to me, this is one of those times....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect he would have done very well in Philly, might have even bought Reid more time. Can't say I'm surprised that we were interested in him.

What makes you say that? I find it surprising that the Colts and Redskins were interested in him in the 3rd round, especially since they got great QBs in the first round. Unless the plan was to "Kevin Kolb" Russell Wilson, I don't think it would have been a great idea to take him so early.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because we were interested in him does not mean they actually had all intentions of picking him. I'm sure they were interested in about 10 different players in that spot.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Defensive expectation for Indy in 2016
      The Colts still need more talent on defense I think. Give it a year or two and it may be top 10 in some good categories. Wouldn't expect a great year from them but a solid one maybe!   Worried about our CB's a little. Robinson should be an upgrade over Toler but I have heard he can't cover the outside worth anything and neither can Butler.   The pass rush will have to help the CB's this year to be a successful season for the defense.  
    • TY Hilton loves playing for Chud
      Where that Indy 500 package is going to be helpful is letting the 3 burners go deep, and sneaking Allen down the middle seam. I think those are the kind of plays we want to run early to set up throwing the ball deep. Roll Luck out, throw underneath the coverage getting the ball out of his hands, will make the Indy 500 package difficult to defend. Pick your poison. I have to say, with what Chud did with Cam in his rookie year, still raw as a QB, was not a gifted accurate passer coming out of college, and tailoring a system to fit him has me excited. He is going to make sure to put Luck in the right positions. Can't wait to see the offense. Just remember the Denver game and how Chud called that game to perfection. If we can just get Luck to slide or throw the ball away. we are going to score some points. I now have an appreciation as to when Peyton saw guys coming, he just went down. No chance of an injury. Luck's athletic ability will let him escape many times, but I know longer will be angry if he goes down for a loss, if it avoids an injury. Hopefully, the line this year will make such a difference that won't be a worry too much of the time!
    • Defensive expectation for Indy in 2016
      To your number 2.....   Manusky always said the exact same thing.    So did Pagano.     We've always tried to be an attacking defense.   We just haven't succeeded to the degree we'd want....   I think we'll end up roughly in the middle of the pack on defense.     Somewhere between 15--20.   Could we end up higher?      Sure,  it's possible.     But I don't think it's likely.      Hopefully in 2017.  
    • Which one most likely to happen...
      As others have noted,  all of them are not too unreasonable.   Someone,  (the OP?)   should bookmark this list and we should look at it again in January and see how close we come to the targets...  
    • 2015-2016 Indiana Pacers (And rest of the NBA) Season
      Also even though the Raptors came up short congrats to the Raptors fans and the team for a hell of a season and a hell of a run. They played hard and would not quit despite just not having the talent to compete with the Cavs over the long haul. Lowery stepped as did Derozan and Beyombo with rebounds. Just to much Lebron, To much Irving and to much Love
  • Welcome New Members

    • Member Introductions! (Say Hi!)
      When I first saw this thread, I thought I was late to the party, but then I saw that this thread has been going since 2012.   I'm still late to the party, but story of my life.  I joined in 2015, but have been a Colts fan since I was a kid.   My first Colts memory is getting a hat signed by Quentin Coryatt at training camp, and that same year almost going to the SB.   My favorite Colts memory is beating the Pats to get to the SB in 2006.   Favorite Colts:   1. Peyton Manning 2. Marvin Harrison 3. Reggie Wayne 4. Dallas Clark 5. Brandon Stokely   Needless to say, Peyton (#1) and everyone he threw the ball to (#2-5) won me many, many fantasy football games, and are my guys for eternity.   You might assume from my top 5 Colts that I am a "new-age" "fairweather" fan who only likes offense and points.  You are wrong.  I am grateful for the offensive Renaissance in Indy, but Defense is my passion.  My secret top 5 Colts: Bob Sanders, Dwight Freeney, Robert Mathis, Cato June, Gary Brackett.   I want Henry Anderson to help lead a Defensive Renaissance in Indy.  Luck and TY are great, and I hope the OLine is outstanding, but the D is the Key.
    • Member Introductions! (Say Hi!)
      Hey guys,   I have been posting for probably a year or so now.  I reside in Brazil, IN, which is about 20 minutes East of Terre Haute on I-70.  I'm 28 years old and have been a Colts fan since Harbaugh days, but really started following and rooting hard for them after they drafted Manning in 98.  I love our team and my family and I make sure we are ready to rock for every game.  We always have viewing parties at my father-in-laws or my house and are known to holler and scream at the TV!  Hope all is well with all of you, and GO COLTS!
  • Members

    • bravo4460

      bravo4460 884

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yinkgo

      Yinkgo 37

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr Clueless

      Mr Clueless 152

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • FeedCrief

      FeedCrief 155

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RockThatBlue

      RockThatBlue 2,206

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Gavin

      Gavin 6,250

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Derakynn

      Derakynn 884

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • loudnproudcolt

      loudnproudcolt 185

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Clem-Dog

      Clem-Dog 124

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Danielsuprit

      Danielsuprit 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.