Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Stephen

no chance

29 posts in this topic

that's what the majority of experts are giving us. One even likes the patriots by over 20.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We also had a "high likelyhood" of only winning 1-4 games this year. As I recall we began the season on ESPN Power Ranking's No.32 spot. Not that I put much stock into ranks :thmup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How much chance were we given against the Packers?

I think the lowest I remember was some said we would lose by 14. Someone said we would lose in a blow out and not score anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its funny though...the experts don't really believe in this team...they think our success is fueled on some "Angels in the Outfield", "Rudy" cliche sappy sports story *.....I thought/think this team is solid and will only get better....Im going to simply ignore the critics and my Bostonian GF.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How much chance were we given against the Packers?

The difference is home vs the road though. Based on how we played the Packers, I would be more optimistic at home in a close game vs the Pats.

But on the road, Luck turns the ball over more, that is a fact, and that concerns me. Besides, losses to the Bears and a Jets offense that cant do much with most defenses does concern me. That Jets game disaster should not have happened, and if it did not, I would be more optimistic. It also suggests that our D needs the 12th man behind them more often, based on how our D has done on the road.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The difference is home vs the road though. Based on how we played the Packers, I would be more optimistic at home in a close game vs the Pats.

But on the road, Luck turns the ball over more, that is a fact, and that concerns me. Besides, losses to the Bears and a Jets offense that cant do much with most defenses does concern me. That Jets game disaster should not have happened, and if it did not, I would be more optimistic. It also suggests that our D needs the 12th man behind them more often, based on how our D has done on the road.

I was just going to post the same thing. I can explain the Bears game, first outing, etc. the Jets game scares me, it's the outlier. This is a great game to let us know our true selves.

I'm not sure the 'road' makes too much of a difference now. Not after winning two. Lets face it, our D is suspect, we all know that. This game should tell us if our O can keep up with a high scoring team.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New England would have to make some mistakes particularly on 3rd down, Colts have to stop the run, Colts have to move the chains, Colts have to be able to run the ball when the situation calls for it (That means not passing the ball on 3rd and short). We have to get pressure on Tom Brady. do all those things and we MAY NOT need a turnover. Dont do any of those things and we will need a turnover and maybe more then 1. Im not counting on Butler to have another out of body experience and have another great game.Our Linebackers are going to have to step up and get to the QB and force a turnover. Cassius Vaughn is going to have play like he joined the right sport

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that's what the majority of experts are giving us. One even likes the patriots by over 20.

we really dont matchup ..backup corners.......LBs cover Gronkowski.....

...we can score..its just that they can score a lot more......we dont stop good teams that run....we have no answers defensively..

..we just need to see what we can do..because there is a good chance we go back there for the playoffs...

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i wouldn't say the defense has been bad on the road its more like they been put in bad situations in both the bears and jets games because the offense failed to sustain drives and turned it over a bunch. even blaine gabbert could score if a team gave him the ball at the 20 yard line five times in a row

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i wouldn't say the defense has been bad on the road its more like they been put in bad situations in both the bears and jets games because the offense failed to sustain drives and turned it over a bunch. even blaine gabbert could score if a team gave him the ball at the 20 yard line five times in a row

I agree. It is all about where you turn the ball over, if you do turn it over to give the D a chance. Cant afford leave points on the field vs the Pats whatsoever.

Leaving points on the field plus multiple turnovers equals Pats blowout, IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont see the Jets game as a sign of things to come, as much as I see it a wake up call for the scheme. We were not able to adjust to what they brought to the table.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

until the pats fixed the 2ndary problems, any team can come back against the pats, or score points to go ahead to start the game . . . it should be an interesting game . . .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no one is giving

that's what the majority of experts are giving us. One even likes the patriots by over 20.

Good. i want these "experts" to keep doubting.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it's so much about experts doubting the Colts. I suggest it may be that it can be difficult to shed preconceived notions. I have the same problem in fantasy football, often resisting picking up a player or defense that is surging because I didn't expect it of them. It becomes easy to assume it must be some kind of fluke.

I sincerely hope the Colts are no fluke, and to me, this is their statement game. Either they show they're for real, or leave people with a stronger sense that they are the product of a fluff schedule.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These are not the Patriots of 10 years ago, there is no Ty Law in that secondary, Question is do we have a secondary?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wes Welker did not practice for the 2nd straight day today with an ankle injury according to Adam Schefter on NFL Live, Logan Mankins missed another practice as well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wes "Wekler" will probably play....if he doesn't I will be happy and mad. Happy that he's out vs. the Colts, mad that he's out b/c he's my WR1 in FFB..That said, I would gladly trade a Colts win for a stupid FFB loss

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont see the Jets game as a sign of things to come, as much as I see it a wake up call for the scheme. We were not able to adjust to what they brought to the table.

I'm assuming at least some of that was due to it being the first game for Antonio Dixon & Clifton Geathers, who the Colts had just signed a few days earlier.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd rather have the Pats play with a full deck, yeah a win is a win and it counts in the standings but I want to know if we can beat the Pats with all of there pieces and not just because a few of there best players were out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any given Sunday.

Some chance > No chance. We have a better shot than Buffalo did, and they were that close.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we have more of a chance against the pats than we do against texas or denver. mostly because their d isn't that good.

but to win we have to do one thing we can't consistantly do....

STOP THE RUN.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no one is giving

Good. i want these "experts" to keep doubting.

^^^ this. I don't want expectancy I want suprise.

Just like Peyton is a washed up QB that won't make the playoffs. Keep doubting guys!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These are not the Patriots of 10 years ago, there is no Ty Law in that secondary, Question is do we have a secondary?

Exactly, this season has shown that while the Patriots are still a good team, but they are not the dominant force they once had in the past. The bigger question is with two road wins, can the Colts beat a good team on the road, or atleast not embarass themselves like the Bears and even worse the Jets game?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This will be a tough game for both teams. The pats struggle in the secondary where we can really take advantage of them, but to do that we need to apply the running game early to set them up later on. We can not be one dimensional against a team this good. I think the defense will show up and we need to make Brady uncomfortable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree Blue Colt (hey I'm new)

Pats secondary is definitely susceptible -

I really think making Brady uncomfortable is a big part in a win

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"...You remember where they had you, every one of them!"

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree, Pagano says a lot of vanilla statements -- but in this case he is saying "well documented", which is true -- our running D, with Art in the lineup was allowing significantly less YPC.  This is when he is actually on the field, not sitting on the bench.  Here are the stats  -- http://espn.go.com/blog/indianapolis-colts/post/_/id/13395/the-statistics-show-that-the-colts-need-art-jones-on-the-field-to-stop-the-run :   WITHOUT JONES ON THE FIELD 257 rushes for 1,201 yards (4.67 yards per rush) 3.12 yards before contact per rush 12 rushing TDs (4.7 percent of rushes) First downs allowed on 26 percent of rushes WITH JONES ON THE FIELD 165 rushes for 615 yards (3.73 yards per rush) 2.15 yards before contact per rush 2 rushing TDs (1.2 percent of rushes) First downs allowed on 22 percent of rushes   ------------------------------------------------------------------ These numbers are pretty staggering, at least in my opinion (all of them -- the contact before rush sticks out the most to me, but the YPC, TD, and First Downs are all significant, too).   All that said, Jones has not been sidelined more than he's been on the field.  This PED suspension doesn't help the team and as you've said earlier, we won't miss him that much.  I don't agree with you that we won't miss him due to him not being a significant contributor when he is on the field (that he has been) -- but, he hasn't been healthy enough to be on the field long enough to really warrant missing him.... violating the league substance abuse policy doesn't help this team and doesn't help Jones.  If I'm the coach/GM, Jones is on a very short leash (or perhaps already dismissed) for this.
    • And so another rumor is laid to rest. Good riddance.
    • Do it for Pagel          
    • When is the draft going to be?
    • It was similar to what Jones ran at Baltimore but not the same.  That is why I was I didn't think his poor play was earth shattering.   Yup, I ran the numbers of the games he played and the games he didn't play.  In the games he played the Colts allowed a lower YPC average than the games he didn't play.  The odd thing as I was running the numbers though, is with Jone in the game the opposing team used the running game a lot more.  With Jones teams ran the ball an average of 28.667 times per game, without Jones they ran the ball 20.33 times per game.  Without Jones the COlts D gave a lot more long running plays, with Jones, they gave up a lot more first downs via the ground.    So, I will admit I was wrong about the higher YPC with Jones.  But I still would not quanitify what Jones did as a significant contribution to the run defense, mainly because teams were able to grind out the running game and keep the chains moving and keep the Colts O off the field.   Lastly, quoting Pagano doesn't really mean a lot.
  • Welcome New Members

  • Members

    • kam0327

      kam0327 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bababooey

      bababooey 1,273

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mark Laughner

      Mark Laughner 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Bluefire4

      Bluefire4 957

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JasonABrown

      JasonABrown 36

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • backshoulderfade

      backshoulderfade 1,048

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coffeedrinker

      Coffeedrinker 3,344

      Senior Members
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bayone

      bayone 2,015

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dw49

      dw49 2,119

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Derakynn

      Derakynn 887

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.