Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Phil J

Red Zone

52 posts in this topic

haven't seen the numbers to back it up, but I am positive we really stink within the 20. with such a high ranking offense, we should be racking up the TD's.

gotta correct that before next week. FG's aren't going to beat the Pats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We seemed to do Fine last night. Well, Luck made that possible but still

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just seems like other teams can casually wait for things to open up cause their oline really helps them out within the 20. Our oline seems to be giving Luck decent time everywhere else on the field (sometimes not, his moving around makes up for the pocket collapsing).

haven't seen many short toss up passes or other types of plays like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FJC if you are there, can you give us our Red Zone numbers?

IDK if this helps any but....

the Colts in the Red Zone:

avg 1.6 TD's out of 3.3 chances a game for an 46.67% scoring on the season in the red zone. but that is TD's only. i dont know if you want it with FG's or not. hope that makes sense lol

1.6 TD's (ranked 19th in NFL)

3.3 chances (ranked 13th in NFL)

46.67% scoring on season in red zone (ranked 22nd in NFL which is better then Chicago,Giants, and Seattle who are playoff teams)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We are going to have to increase the TD's in the red zone....we seem to bog down there a lot, and yet we still continue to win. when we convert more opportunities to TD's, we will pull away from more teams and relieve a lot of stress on us the fans.....too many nail biters....GO COLTS!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of it is execution and some of it is play calling. The Jets game immediately sticks out in my head as a game we didn't score TD's in because players failing to execute. Other times, I feel Arians calls too many gamble plays with little success rate inside the 20. The wide receiver reverses from inside the 15 yard line drive me crazy when I see it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IDK if this helps any but....

the Colts in the Red Zone:

avg 1.6 TD's out of 3.3 chances a game for an 46.67% scoring on the season in the red zone. but that is TD's only. i dont know if you want it with FG's or not. hope that makes sense lol

1.6 TD's (ranked 19th in NFL)

3.3 chances (ranked 13th in NFL)

46.67% scoring on season in red zone (ranked 22nd in NFL which is better then Chicago,Giants, and Seattle who are playoff teams)

I can't believe the overall numbers are apparently so hard to find, but I can't find stats which include FG's either. Anyway, AV is 6 for 6 from within 29 yards, but only 3 of 6 from 30-39. I would think that would leave the Colts in the mid 20 range in the NFL in red zone scoring, so not very good. I can't remember who said in another post the lack of TE production in the red zone (only 1 TD so far? Allen as I recall) may be one cause, and I agree with that. And the most obvious is better between the tackle running too. Take away Luck's 5 rushing TDs, and the Colts have 2, which would place them last in the NFL this season. I will say this though, and I agree they need to become more efficient in the red zone, but if that's the biggest area of concern on O, I'd take it and run. There could be far worse problems (we all did watch the Jags O last night, right?). Like never getting there enough to have stats to even worry about...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 14/30 or 46.67% is an improvement over 2011 (16/38 42.11%) with the biggest difference being that there is almost the same # of attempts and an even closer # of scores from the previous year.

With that said it's a far cry from the league best 64% over the previous 5 years(2006-2010), or the league best 60% of the previous 11 years (99-10).

I haven't found the #'s for the team from 1998.

However I did see that Manning was 25/56 192 yds 17 td 2 int in the redzone and the team had 5 rushing redzone scores and 12 redzone field goals, but there was no mention of how many red zone attempts there were.

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/football/sfn/sfn812rz.htm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe the overall numbers are apparently so hard to find, but I can't find stats which include FG's either. Anyway, AV is 6 for 6 from within 29 yards, but only 3 of 6 from 30-39. I would think that would leave the Colts in the mid 20 range in the NFL in red zone scoring, so not very good. I can't remember who said in another post the lack of TE production in the red zone (only 1 TD so far? Allen as I recall) may be one cause, and I agree with that. And the most obvious is better between the tackle running too. Take away Luck's 5 rushing TDs, and the Colts have 2, which would place them last in the NFL this season. I will say this though, and I agree they need to become more efficient in the red zone, but if that's the biggest area of concern on O, I'd take it and run. There could be far worse problems (we all did watch the Jags O last night, right?). Like never getting there enough to have stats to even worry about...

i def. agree with that. i was expecting both allen and fleener both to have atleast 3 or 4 TD's on 12st,2nd, or 3rd and goal plays. but they dont get it. i dont know if its because their just not getting open as i lose them in the play or the camera just doesnt show them or luck does not trust them enough to throw to them in coverage. but fleener i believe has 222 yards receiving and 0 TD's which is shocking considering how much Luck loved to throw to him at stanford.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Taking our personnel into account is key to understanding our redzone troubles.

We have small, yet fast, receivers and one of the greatest route runners in the game. So when the field is shortened, in the redzone for instance, it is harder to throw the ball because separation isn't easy to come by. That's why Allen has looked good in the redzone because he is a big target, and mismatch in goalline/redzone coverages.

When our line is more secure and we can take more advantage of Fleener and Allen, I see them being huge endzone targets for Luck.

As of now, we struggle. However, lets not pretend we can't score at all. Luck has shown he is dangerous in the redzone with his legs, and Reggie will always be more than most defenders can handle.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is something that you can expect with a young offense and a young quarterback. But if we're going to squeeze four more wins out of our remaining schedule, we'll have to do a better job in the red zone. More touchdowns, fewer turnovers.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we should run it more out of spread. Apart from last night when we would get to the red zone we would either abandon the run completely or throw in extra lineman and advertise to the world we are about to run. The playcalling needs to be better there. Running the ball makes options happen for your tight ends on the next 2 downs. One linebacker hesitates and its td!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of it is execution and some of it is play calling. The Jets game immediately sticks out in my head as a game we didn't score TD's in because players failing to execute. Other times, I feel Arians calls too many gamble plays with little success rate inside the 20. The wide receiver reverses from inside the 15 yard line drive me crazy when I see it.

It's not just the red zone, they have to be smarter in scoring position, in the opposition's territory. They're routinely self-destructing and having drives stalled in the opponent's territory. They're not converting TDs and are wasting FG opportunities. In general, they're not maximizing their scoring opportunities. The play call on Luck's INT drove me crazy. With any sort of a safe call in that position, you go into the half up 20-0 and get the ball to start the second half. Who wouldn't take that on the road? Instead, you run three slow developing routes with Luck throwing the ball 25 yards through the air.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Were also comitting dpme penaltied that are killing drives. The stupid penaltiez have to stop!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know, one thing we should do is stop using empty sets on third down. Especially on moderate to-go situations. And especially in the red zone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We need to use Fleener near the end zone.

He has to get healthy first but once he does I do think you are starting to see them use the tightends more around the endzone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We need to use Fleener near the end zone.
exactly..dude is about 6'6..throw the ball up to the heavans and let him go get it..
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It also seems we turn the ball over a lot towards the end zone. I think we've had 2-3 fumbles at our end zone. We need to start throwing it away if nothing is open, a quick dump off, or Luck needs to at least get a yard or two rushing to help Vinny IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know, one thing we should do is stop using empty sets on third down. Especially on moderate to-go situations. And especially in the red zone.

Yeah, good luck with that. Arians is obsessed with the empty set. The thing that drives me crazy about it is, he'll call an empty set with Ballard or Brown out wide. If you're going to have backs on the field, why not start them out in the backfield and have them motion to an empty set as opposed to showing your hand right off the bat?

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, good luck with that. Arians is obsessed with the empty set. The thing that drives me crazy about it is, he'll call an empty set with Ballard or Brown out wide. If you're going to have backs on the field, why not start them out in the backfield and have them motion to an empty set as opposed to showing your hand right off the bat?

I don't mind empty backfield. I just don't like it on third down. Especially in the red zone.

And I agree, it would make sense to motion the backis either in or out if you're going to go empty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More specific in the 10 yard line

If we dont run the ball sucessfully we always have problems

ps: im not blaming Luck for this I dont think its his fault

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just mentioned we need to improve the ability to procure TD's instead of FG's in the RZ in another thread...

Yeah, it seems we kinda bog down in the RZ at times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You may be.

I would not dwell on cherry-pick stats....inside the 20..inside the 10

in the 1st quarter...in the 4th quarter......they can mislead you even if they have meaning

are we moving the ball?...do we get first downs?. I think we are and we do...much of the time

Lets be real. We have allowed more points than we've scored..we're a team 1/3 of rookies...

//we have to pull off an upset almost every week....this whole season is one big uspet....

Its where we are and its what we do./.. we have to beat teams that are better than we are

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a HUGE Luck fan, think he's absolutely amazing player. But I agree he seems to bog down in the red zone especially if its not a "back to the wall" situation, i've said it to myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm hoping Fleener will help once he gets back. He was a redzone threat at Stanford. Heck, he was an everything threat at Stanford.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Id sure love to see more TD`s than field goals like they`ve been scoring. Going to need to improve on that to have any chance for the playoffs! There...I said it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant match the Pats' TDs with FGs, that is a no brainer, or any other good offense. We are not going to win a shootout with the Pats. Our best chance is to hold them to more FGs than TDs and keep the game close hoping a big play will turn the game around in the closing stages, easier said than done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm hoping Fleener will help once he gets back. He was a redzone threat at Stanford. Heck, he was an everything threat at Stanford.

i have been waiting for that all year and still no TD's from him lol :giveup::facepalm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like Luck always throws to the middle of the field in the endzone, we need to attack the corners more. Always a massive cluster in the middle of the field. Guys need to get better seperation as well. The line also needs to hold up for more than five seconds for this to work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we are just better from further back... Somebody check Luck's numbers.... Is he more efficient on 3rd and 13 than 3rd and 5? It sure seems like it... I know one thing... Luck has my confidence on 3rd and whatever. And that is a quality I like.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

. The line also needs to hold up for more than five seconds for this to work.

Absolutely. This is #1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FG's aren't going to beat the Pats.

Exactly Phil, we have to match Tom Brady scoring drives toe for toe. Be bold on 1st down and go for the jugular. No guts; no glory baby! How do you think the nerd gets the drop dead gorgeous girlfriend?

2 words: Moxy & confidence man! haha:yahoo::rock:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the same problem that the steelers had last year. With the smaller speed receivers, you can rack up big yards but in the red zone it gets harder because they dont have the space to operate in. When Fleener and Allen get more experience it will help. Also improved line play will give more time for receivers to get open. Although it seems to be a sin sometimes to say it here, getting a WR like Allen would help both in Red Zone plays and on third downs. A guy who can go up and get the ball. A lot of analysts are starting to say it too. Not saying it will happen but who knows. An offense who scores 25-30 points per game does help the D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    •       Dang right!  I already have my "Fire BPRoland!!" thread penned, and a twitchy finger on the Submit Reply button...      .   .   .      \     Just caught up on this thread... nice job folks.
    •   Going back to 2013 (because we can't count 2012 on Chuck's resume can we?) in the 1st Qtr the points differential breaks down as:   Positive: 27 Games Even: 11 Games Negative: 26 Games   Surprising... 
    • "Where'd you get it? [A dreamweaver hanging off a Kia Sorento's rear view mirror]. My ex girlfriend. Ex girlfriend? What happened? Was she cramping your style? Did she have too much [emotional] baggage? Did your mom hate her?"    "I'm Coby Bryant. Coby plays basketball. Yeah, I know. I just meant that I was the Coby Bryant of tennis...If you never called it quits [Darren], you could have been as good as Tiger. Tiger Woods plays golf. I know. I just meant like the Tiger Woods of tennis."    "Do you remember when I played with Dash Stevens? He was the worst. You're way better than him [brother]."   "Look at you...You still haven't made a move for her since the Fifth grade...You want me want me to hook you up with that sweet caboose?"    The following quotes are taken from a 2014 comedy that revolves around the sport of tennis. Doubles Men's tennis to be exact called "Break Point" directed by Jay Karas. This 1 hour & 30 minute picture is self explanatory with no real left turns in it that will surprise or astonish you overall. Here, in a nutshell, is the plot: An older brother named Jimmy [Jeremy Sisto] is a wise cracking alcoholic & womanizer who desperately wants to return to the professional tennis circuit. There's only 1 problem: Nobody & I do mean nobody wants to coach or partner with Jimmy on the court. He's burned a lot of bridges. You submit a name & there's a good chance Jimmy screwed them over in some form or fashion. Actually, to be more specific, Jimmy needs to win matches as an amateur in Palm Springs, Florida to even get a shot at competing in the US Open as an unranked player. Hades, Jimmy even did a horrible thing to his younger sibling named Darren [David Walton]. He dumped his doubles partner & teacher for an instructor named Dak Stevens that Darren never saw coming several years ago so there's definitely some bad blood there or at least a huge unresolved grudge anyway.    Darren is in his 30's, divorced, & a substitute teacher in NY City. Did I mention that an 11 yr old student named Barry [Joshua Rush] follows him around like a lost puppy on the cusp of Summer Vacation? What's funny is this kid is always grilling Darren with questions & my first quote at the start of this review is reminiscent of an expert on relationship advice except for the fact that Barry hasn't hit puberty yet. Barry lives with his grandmother since his biological mother can't raise her son or won't due to an addiction problem or she likes to party too much instead of being a responsible parent. Obviously Barry is looking for a father figure mentor in his life & he has chosen Barry to fill that rather large void. Darren reluctantly offers to teach Barry some pointers on tennis every Thursday afternoon. A tall undertaking since Barry's hand eye coordination appears to require considerable work.    Jimmy & Darren's dad is a local animal veterinarian named Jack played by the always believable JK Simmons.  Jack's primary assistant is a pretty blond woman named Heather [Amy Smart]. Darren has always had a serious crush on Heather since he was little growing up in the same neighborhood. He just gets tongue tied around her using any excuse to avoid her. Heather has always had an attraction to Darren as well & she finds his nervousness around her charming & cute. You know the links Darren will go to not get flustered near her like listening to Billy Joel in his car. Stuff like that.    Barry is a good kid who wears loud outfits with flamboyant colors on them. Jimmy, on the other hand, reminds us all of the legendary John McEnroe always complaining with judges & competitors over whether the ball landed in our out. I kept hearing that song by Asia 'Soul Survivor' in my head written about John's unlikely return from a devastating injury in his tennis career.    "...And from the wreckage I will arise
      Cast the ashes back in their eyes
      See the fire, I will defend
      Just keep on burning right to the end."    Basically, we all know what's gonna happen here. Darren & Jimmy show Barry that his mother's erratic behavior isn't his fault, how to stand up for himself, & that some people just can't be saved no matter how much you try to help them or make things right. They, the brothers, don't make the US Open cut, but Darren finally grows a backbone & asks Heather out at match point with her no good, high maintenance boyfriend sitting right next to her. A bold, & yet never before seen jolt of public confidence from Darren that paid off in the end. Sweet.    Break Point is far from sophisticated or even elaborate for that matter. I just liked it because of the 2 brothers & Barry. A motley crew that just works. It's just interesting to see a crass guy, a refined guy, & a naive kid with hardly any world experience hang out together & give 1 another a boost of confidence, self-worth, & testosterone. Let's roll with a B- here.        I like this Joe Walsh/James Gang song "Walk Away" since Jimmy preferred to walk away from responsibility or hard work when obstacles presented themselves until about the last 25 minutes of this flick.     [One of the best drum covers I have ever heard actually really tight.]     
    • Slow starts. We were leading by the end of Q1 on more occasions than we were losing last year. 
  • Members

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.