Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

krunk

Still Looking For Those Elusive Turnovers! [Merge]

25 posts in this topic

Glad we won, but we just can't seem to get any turnovers for some reason. We had a chance or two today, but we always seem to miss out. Guess we gotta just keep pounding the rock till we shake a stone loose I suppose!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is getting out of hand. We haven't had one since the first drive on the second half against the Packers and only three all year. We have had one since the first half of the Vikings game. To give you an idea of how bad this is for our defense the Bears doubled our season total in a single game today against the Titans. I am not saying we need six turnovers a game but we need more than one a month.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hah I was thinking the same thing when Dwight got that sack fumble that miraculously fell into the hands of the Dolphins OL. I was thinking to myself :thinking:

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we start forcing turnovers we will go from just edging teams out at the end to soundly defeating them.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hah I was thinking the same thing when Dwight got that sack fumble that miraculously fell into the hands of the Dolphins OL. I was thinking to myself :thinking:!

Yeah we can't buy one right about now! If we keep getting pressure like we did today, I expect some to be coming soon though...

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that but we won once again

Yes we did but we aren't going to win a lot of games once we start playing better teams like we have to on the back half our schedule if we don't start forcing some turnovers. Andrew Luck isn't going to drive the ball 80 yards every time when he plays a team like the Texans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes we did but we aren't going to win a lot of games once we start playing better teams like we have to on the back half our schedule if we don't start forcing some turnovers. Andrew Luck isn't going to drive the ball 80 yards every time when he plays a team like the Texans.

Houston's secondary isn't as good as MIami's in my opinion. Now their front 7 gets a slight nod, but not by much. JJ Watt is playing at such a high level right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a legit concern. We all know that the turnover game is crucial, especially down the stretch and in (dare I say it?) the playoffs. We do absolutely need to find a way to create some turnovers.

Hats off to Luck for not giving any away today!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Houston's secondary isn't as good as MIami's in my opinion. Now their front 7 gets a slight nod, but not by much. JJ Watt is playing at such a high level right now.

Wow I dont know about that.

Joseph and Jackson are pretty solid CBs. Manning is a decent safety and Quinn has been playing well this year.

I never thought the Dolphins secondary was really all that good. Theyve been playing some pretty average passing teams to this point.

I would agree the Dolphins front 7 is solid but the way Watt is playing, the Texans are playing the best as a front right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forcing punts and scoring seems to get it done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't want the defense to become turnover dependent either, the Saints used to have a high turnover defense, if they didn't get a turnover they had a hard time stopping teams.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Houston's secondary isn't as good as MIami's in my opinion. Now their front 7 gets a slight nod, but not by much. JJ Watt is playing at such a high level right now.

Houston secondary is fourth best in the NFL and that's impressive when you factor in teams are throwing a lot against them since they are behind in most of the games. They also have 9 INTs to go with that which is triple the number of turnovers we have on the year as a team. Now if you want to give credit to their front seven for getting pressure that's fine but make no mistake they have a lot of talent in that secondary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't want the defense to become turnover dependent either, the Saints used to have a high turnover defense, if they didn't get a turnover they had a hard time stopping teams.

We want a good mix of everything

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Turnovers will come, when the Players get more & more familiar with each other & the 3-4 Defense.

Just be patient you guys

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To me, the lack of turnovers, makes this season even more remarkable.

Because that means we are stopping offenses when we need to.

Without even causing any turnovers, sound coaching and good tackling.

Once the defense starts gelling and we get healthy players back like Vontae & Chapman, we can get turnovers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We took a step forward against Miami with two sack fumbles. Unfortunately, they both bounced the Dolphins way, but if we can keep making teams put the ball on the ground, we'll pick it up eventually.

Something else that will help will be getting a lead. We haven't had any significant lead since the Vikings game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's nothing new, but we're not getting any sort of big plays outside of the passing game - no big runs, no big returns, no blocked kicks. So, it's not just the lack of turnovers. When you add it up, 5-3 is pretty amazing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

when we start forcing turnovers we will be able to get more solid wins, not 3 points wins

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It really is hard to believe we have forced so few turnovers. Some teams get as many as we have in one half. I thought we had one yesterday but got a bad bounce, but other then that i can't remember really even coming close recently. Maybe the ball that hit Angerer in the Titans game when he wasn't even looking? I think it points to a lack of playmakers on that side of the ball. I don't think it's a coincidence that the ball hits the ground once Mathis and Freeney are on the field together. They both have been banged up so it's been hard on us in that area. Outside of that though we seem to have a bunch of average talent but not a lot of playmakers. Would be nice to add one or two over the offseason. A short field off a turnover could really help out Luck and the boys on offense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's nothing new, but we're not getting any sort of big plays outside of the passing game - no big runs, no big returns, no blocked kicks. So, it's not just the lack of turnovers. When you add it up, 5-3 is pretty amazing.

I think there were some decent runs during the TN game, didnt someone get a hand on an extra point attempt during the Browns game???

just saying, this team is making some plays, maybe not alot of primetime plays that'll show up on the highlight reels, but they're making plays

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its mindset with many of our players most of which are in the secondary, I have seen Freeman trying to strip the ball on a couple instances once he wrapped his man up and Freeney and Mathis almost always going for the strip sack when they get back there other then that our defense doesnt really have players that have done much of that, I think part of that is some players its just not in them to be play makers while others are still getting used to the scheme and where they are supposed to be

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So sorry for your loss.  I like to think James now has the best seats to watch the games along with others who have gone before him.  
    • Denver got lot of compensatory picks but I think they actually lost, considering what could've been. If the cutoffs had been more favorable, if Okung contract would have counted as just 1 yr, 5M deal, they could've gotten   3rd 3rd 4th 7th   Instead, they got   3rd 5th 7th 7th
    • Glad to see the Pacers win last night. It was very much needed with the losing streak and the PG talk. We will make the Playoffs but probably wont do much once there. Lets not kid ourselves though as in the big picture of things the Warriors are going to spank everyone including the Cavs. Cavs will come out of the East but have a less of a chance of beating the Warriors this season than last. Cavs had their 1 year miracle, got a Title for Cleveland but to think they will beat the Warriors 2 years in a row is a stretch. Warriors will have HCA again and they now have Durant to go with the other 3. LeBron is only 3-4 in Finals play as well. He dominates a weal Eastern Conference but against the West his teams are below .500 in the Finals. My money is on the Warriors, LeBron just doesn't have that unbeatable invincible factor that Michael Jordan had being 6-0 in Finals. Jordan is the GOAT and it's not even debatable and Magic ruled the 80's when rough Basketball was aloud. The stuff Draymond Green is doing now, players in the 80's would laugh it off. This generation of players are way too pampered.
    • ALL RBs are luxury picks. One of the most overrated and useless positions, as is Safety. Look at how badly DeMarco Murray flopped after leaving the Cowboys.   I'd even take an elite Kicker or Punter over an elite RB any day.
    •   Thanks for that. I have no problem drafting for need. Actually I lean that way.   But most people here are strongly for drafting BPA, but when they were making selections, the players drafted mostly addressed needs. (Not always but in much of the picks.) Even in the first round, whenever we had to make a concensus pick, we asked ourselves what the team's needs were as opposed to "who the BPA is". So, I just wondered if people truly believed in drafting BPA as opposed to drafting BPA at a position of need.
  • Members

    • Carlos Danger

      Carlos Danger 783

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Boomstick1

      Boomstick1 297

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NannyMcafee

      NannyMcafee 204

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rock8591

      rock8591 409

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nesjan3

      Nesjan3 315

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cjrichard

      cjrichard 38

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • The Peytonator

      The Peytonator 1,867

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 5,437

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 6,607

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Defjamz26

      Defjamz26 2,120

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.