Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

chad72

The 2004 draft QB class - 2 of them meeting this week - Big Ben and Eli Manning

24 posts in this topic

Philip Rivers and Eli Manning have met twice before - in 2005 and 2009. They will meet again in 2013.

Rivers and the Chargers won both those contests. It always felt like Rivers had the burden of Chargers nation behind him when he played Eli and he played well in both those meetings.

When the Giants gave up 2 first rounders and a 3rd rounder for Eli Manning to move up from No.4 to No.1, it was considered a lot then (peanuts compared to the RG3 trade :)).

Big Ben was there in the draft room with his agent and was mic'd up and said "they gave up way too much for Eli."

Now, in the 2 head-to-head games involving Big Ben and Eli, Big Ben won 33-30 in his rookie year at NY while Eli won 21-14 in 2008.

Do you think Big Ben still thinks about those comparisons in 2004? Big Ben and Eli have 2 SB rings while Big Ben has 3 SB appearances. Rivers is a distant third with just 1 AFCCG appearance and no SB appearance

Thoughts???.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This was one of the better QB classes. Eli and Big Ben have both done their thing and had plenty of success in the league. Rivers has had success too, but his team is by far the worst of the three and his coach is one of the worst in the league. Don't forget that Matt Schaub was in that draft class too. 3rd round pick by Atlanta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This was one of the better QB classes. Eli and Big Ben have both done their thing and had plenty of success in the league. Rivers has had success too, but his team is by far the worst of the three and his coach is one of the worst in the league. Don't forget that Matt Schaub was in that draft class too. 3rd round pick by Atlanta

Yep, looks like there are going to soon be three ringbearers from this draft class...fingers crossed. :D

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, looks like there are going to soon be three ringbearers from this draft class...fingers crossed. :D

It wouldn't surprise me if it happened. Philip Rivers is only 30, so there could potentially be 4 ringbearers from that class if San Diego gets their act together.

Actually, there already are 3 ringbearers. In the 6th round, one Jim Sorgi was drafted!

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It wouldn't surprise me if it happened. Philip Rivers is only 30, so there could potentially be 4 ringbearers from that class if San Diego gets their act together.

Actually, there already are 3 ringbearers. In the 6th round, one Jim Sorgi was drafted!

Darn it, forgot about Sorgi! Lol then we should expect 5. Rivers is due to get one sooner or later as well hahaha. A good QB class no doubt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 rings combined between the two. Hopefully gonna be a great game.

Since we're talking about the 2004 QB class, let's not forget our beloved 1st round pick that year, JP Losman!

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 rings combined between the two. Hopefully gonna be a great game.

Since we're talking about the 2004 QB class, let's not forget our beloved 1st round pick that year, JP Losman!

Losman, Losman, where art thou Losman? haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Philip Rivers and Eli Manning have met twice before - in 2005 and 2009. They will meet again in 2013.

Rivers and the Chargers won both those contests. It always felt like Rivers had the burden of Chargers nation behind him when he played Eli and he played well in both those meetings.

When the Giants gave up 2 first rounders and a 3rd rounder for Eli Manning to move up from No.4 to No.1, it was considered a lot then (peanuts compared to the RG3 trade :)).

Big Ben was there in the draft room with his agent and was mic'd up and said "they gave up way too much for Eli."

Now, in the 2 head-to-head games involving Big Ben and Eli, Big Ben won 33-30 in his rookie year at NY while Eli won 21-14 in 2008.

Do you think Big Ben still thinks about those comparisons in 2004? Big Ben and Eli have 2 SB rings while Big Ben has 3 SB appearances. Rivers is a distant third with just 1 AFCCG appearance and no SB appearance

Thoughts???.

chad.....Can we consider Philip Rivers outstanding enough to rate his 'class' with Eli M. and Ben...

..who else came out that year?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Losman, Losman, where art thou Losman? haha

Well, he did have his best game vs the Texans in 2006....two 83 yard bombs to Lee Evans and hitting the game winner to Peerless Price...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That 2004 year is the best QB class in the last 15 years.

This year's class has the potential to beat the 2004 class.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, he did have his best game vs the Texans in 2006....two 83 yard bombs to Lee Evans and hitting the game winner to Peerless Price...

Yeah, the Texans seem to have given up a lot of best games to quarterbacks, runningbacks, receivers, etc. in their history...good thing those days are in the past. Looking forward to Sunday man. I wonder if Super Mario is out with a vengeance or out with an injury. Either way, it should still be an interesting game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That 2004 year is the best QB class in the last 15 years.

This year's class has the potential to beat the 2004 class.

Definitely...12, Griffin, Tannehill, it's going to be great watching these guys, these three in particular, grow and get better as the game moves more and more in the passing direction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, the Texans seem to have given up a lot of best games to quarterbacks, runningbacks, receivers, etc. in their history...good thing those days are in the past. Looking forward to Sunday man. I wonder if Super Mario is out with a vengeance or out with an injury. Either way, it should still be an interesting game.

Our run D is outright pitiful. Foster Fantasy owners will feel like billionaires come Sunday. Anything less than 200 yards is a disappointment. Texans D will also be good enough to take away our running game (not that we ever play to our strength with it anyway) and they'll force us into all pass mode (and Gailey abandons the run at the first sign of adversity, so that should happen fast).

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our run D is outright pitiful. Foster Fantasy owners will feel like billionaires come Sunday. Anything less than 200 yards is a disappointment. Texans D will also be good enough to take away our running game (not that we ever play to our strength with it anyway) and they'll force us into all pass mode (and Gailey abandons the run at the first sign of adversity, so that should happen fast).

Hey, I don't know, everyone thought the Packers would be one dimensional against us but Rodgers lit up our secondary horribly. Receivers were catching balls that I didn't think possible. I hope our front 7 can stuff C.J. quickly because if he gets going, then the passing game will open up and Stevie Johnson will be a big target. This game is going to be decided in the trenches, that's for sure. I don't know if it's true but I believe Ben Tate will be out Sunday, so the Bills will get a dose of Justin Forsett. He could be the game-changer, because if he fills in for Foster well enough, then our play action and nakeds will not become predictable. If he doesn't, however, then let's just say Dareus and Anderson will join Mario in his quest for #8...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, for one thing, going up against Rodgers is a heckuva lot different than Ryan Fitzpatrick. Your defense looks scary good and Green Bay was the only team they really had problems playing against. For crying out loud you just flat out beat up Flacco and the Ravens.

And even if your second RB is out, you'll still have plenty of weapons to maul our defense. It's been very uncreative and super vanilla and we never do anything creative, like blitz. So if we rush 4 all day, it's going to be a long day.

Funnty thing is, I used to not like the Texans, and that's because they were once playing in Peyton's division (it's his division, you're just playing in it :P). But now with him moving onto better things in the NFL, I've warmed up to the Texans a lot.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely...12, Griffin, Tannehill, it's going to be great watching these guys, these three in particular, grow and get better as the game moves more and more in the passing direction.

Russell Wilson isn't doing too bad for himself. And Weeden has been steadily improving. Let's not forget the potential Osweiller has after Peyton. And Nick Foles might be starting soon too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, for one thing, going up against Rodgers is a heckuva lot different than Ryan Fitzpatrick. Your defense looks scary good and Green Bay was the only team they really had problems playing against. For crying out loud you just flat out beat up Flacco and the Ravens.

And even if your second RB is out, you'll still have plenty of weapons to maul our defense. It's been very uncreative and super vanilla and we never do anything creative, like blitz. So if we rush 4 all day, it's going to be a long day.

Funnty thing is, I used to not like the Texans, and that's because they were once playing in Peyton's division (it's his division, you're just playing in it :P). But now with him moving onto better things in the NFL, I've warmed up to the Texans a lot.

You're right, it was his division. haha Last year, we chanted " We're not gonna take it anymore" and took it by force hahaha. Now hopefully it will be ours for some time hahaha. I hope PM knows we aren't done with him yet...we will probably be seeing him consistently in the playoffs until he retires, and we're going to give it our all to make sure he doesn't get to the Big One. :dancing:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Russell Wilson isn't doing too bad for himself. And Weeden has been steadily improving. Let's not forget the potential Osweiller has after Peyton. And Nick Foles might be starting soon too

I haven't seen much of Wilson but he could be the Brady if you will of this bunch. Well, not in terms of talent, but the whole late round draft pick factor who rose from adversity and managed to start and sustain success early. Weeden was good in college and I knew he would translate well. I don't think his ceiling is as high as the others though, because it might take a few years for Cleveland to assemble the right pieces for him to get his team to actually contend. Osweiler isn't going to be playing for a while, just like Mallett up in NE lol...but they both have the potential for sure. I'm iffy on Nick Foles, he plays well, but one of his knocks coming out of Arizona was his lack of athleticism. With that line in Philly, he would be running for his life and unfortunately I don't think he's as fast as Vick lol. But I wouldn't mind seeing some change-up there. Two rookie starters in the NFC East, with teams who can actually contend. Who would've thunk it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't seen much of Wilson but he could be the Brady if you will of this bunch. Well, not in terms of talent, but the whole late round draft pick factor who rose from adversity and managed to start and sustain success early.

I don't know that I'd call a 3rd round pick a late round pick. Maybe you could call him the Schaub of this draft, though ;)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know that I'd call a 3rd round pick a late round pick. Maybe you could call him the Schaub of this draft, though ;)

You're right...I actually like that comparison better. :number1:haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bills not really being blown out....but did I nail the fact that we hate running the ball even though we have two great backs or what?

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The QB is not everything, that's what Eli and Big Ben proved in that game. Sure their good, but I get sick of hearing about it like the QB is just everything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It wouldn't surprise me if it happened. Philip Rivers is only 30, so there could potentially be 4 ringbearers from that class if San Diego gets their act together.

Ahem.... uh... yeah. ;)

Actually, there already are 3 ringbearers. In the 6th round, one Jim Sorgi was drafted!

So, 5 is still a possibility?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, not at all. Injuries are the only thing they do report fast.    Last year and the year before that and the year before that they would tweet out updates anytime a play was made, they would tweet out anytime a player looks good or bad, and nearly everytime you'd refresh the browser there would be plenty of updates. This year? They take 20 to 30 minutes to tweet any updates. And when they do tweet its something vague. 
    • Why?  Because they did not tell you Langford's status in the half second after it happened?    
    • Thank you.  My favorite thing about the interview was : " Hope so, hope so. But that’s definitely been a point of focus for me this offseason, just getting better at rushing the passer, because it was almost embarrassing for me last year — at least coming from college, where whenever I worked one of my moves, I kind of expected to beat the guy. In the league, I guess you kind of have to accept that the dudes across from you are getting paid quite a bit, too. You’re not going to win every single time, so that’s definitely been a focal point for me, working on that this offseason for sure. "  
    • Baltimore should Thank Charles Dickens for the name of there football team as well as Cleveland for there team simply put the team & name come from outside Baltimore . They celebrate a team & name whose origins are from elsewhere while trying to tell Indianapolis Colts fans how Colts history & a Lombardi belong to there city .    “You will be greatly shocked and grieved,” Charles Dickens wrote to a friend in 1841, “to hear that the Raven is no more!” His pet raven, Grip, had died. At the behest of his children, Dickens wrote poor Grip in his most recent book, Barnaby Rudge, maintaining in its pages Grip’s name and his loquacious powers of imitating human speech. In 1842, Edgar Allan Poe shook hands with Charles Dickens in Philadelphia, and spoke about Barnaby Rudge, which Poe had recently reviewed with the criticism that Dickens should have given the raven a prophetic presence in the story. In 1845, a prophetic raven was penned into existence, this time by the American author. The creation spawned reproach itself, as some judged Mr. Poe as lying in the shadow of Mr. Dickens, as may be derived from James R. Lowell’s journalistic jingle: Here comes Poe with his raven, like Barnaby Rudge,
      Three-fifths of him genius and two-fifths sheer fudge. 170 years later, however, nearly everyone knows Poe’s raven, and nearly no one knows Dickens’—or even Barnaby Rudge’s, for that matter. Grip the raven is forgotten; another raven holds the world in its grip: the raven named Nevermore. As Poe purposefully reincarnated Dickens’ merry raven into his macabre ravings, so too do people purposefully reincarnate the relentless madness of Poe’s raven into their own ravings—making them beautiful in their terror. Your welcome for the history lesson interesting as it might be , Baltimore of old & new was made by others in other cities & enjoyed by many who created nothing much without the help of others so that Baltimore could call it its own , history evolves those who fail to study it do not .
    • https://www.bing.com/search?q=lance+stephenson&filters=ufn%3a"lance+stephenson"+sid%3a"b424c2b7-f5d8-61c7-43bf-d7a606a4017e"&form=EDGEAR&qs=MB&cvid=8d1ef9eaafac4384a3fedef2d25bbcb8&pq=lance stephenson   Timberwolves have interest. He very likely is either asking to much or teams think he will ask to much after he signs a minimal contract after it expires. Plus there are not many teams with much money actually. Some are over the cap even
  • Welcome New Members

  • Members

    • Gavin

      Gavin 6,435

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Btown_Colt

      Btown_Colt 48

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Lucky Charm

      Lucky Charm 55

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash

      Flash 95

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CantBeStopped

      CantBeStopped 241

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • achcolts

      achcolts 142

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 8,904

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colts_Fan12

      Colts_Fan12 2,118

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RockThatBlue

      RockThatBlue 2,555

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ED29_1659yards

      ED29_1659yards 45

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.