Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Luck ranked #1 among qbs so far


Case

Recommended Posts

Was looking at stats on espn and saw that luck is #1 in total qbr.

Peyton 5th

Brady 6th

RG3 10th

Eli 14th

Rodgers 16th

Not saying luck is better than those players just listed some for comparasion. Discuss

What exactly goes into QBR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

FIRST!

QBR is a really complicated QB rating system that ESPN came up with. It is supposed to be more accurate than the traditional QB efficiency rating system that is currently used. QBR supposedly takes into account the situation a QB is in and what he does. For example, INTs hurt a QB's efficiency rating, period. But in QBR, I believe an INT thrown when the game is still undecided is given more weight than an INT thrown when you are on the losing side of a blowout and just chucking it to comeback. Other things include scrambles that gain first down are given more weight than a designed QB run play.

Bottom-line, it's supposed to be a more accurate measurement of QB performance than the traditional rating system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FIRST!

QBR is a really complicated QB rating system that ESPN came up with. It is supposed to be more accurate than the traditional QB efficiency rating system that is currently used. QBR supposedly takes into account the situation a QB is in and what he does. For example, INTs hurt a QB's efficiency rating, period. But in QBR, I believe an INT thrown when the game is still undecided is given more weight than an INT thrown when you are on the losing side of a blowout and just chucking it to comeback. Other things include scrambles that gain first down are given more weight than a designed QB run play.

Bottom-line, it's supposed to be a more accurate measurement of QB performance than the traditional rating system.

It ends up being somewhat of an advertisement for ESPN...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What exactly goes into QBR

It's a proprietary formula. No transparency means I will never give it serious consideration as a metric and the fact that everything is "clutch-weighted" makes the whole measure extremely subjective regardless of how the formula is implemented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a proprietary formula. No transparency means I will never give it serious consideration as a metric and the fact that everything is "clutch-weighted" makes the whole measure extremely subjective regardless of how the formula is implemented.

Yep. It's pretty clear that it's heavily weighing Luck's performance at the end of halves and games. Which are important moments in a game no doubt, but if they decided to add a bit more weight to 3rd Q performance? He'd probably be near the bottom. Those end of half drives along with his 3rd down runs are probably what's driving this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perfect example of why the QBR fails the ole eyeball test because this is simply not the case.

I give the QBR as much merit as Skip Bayless' top 10 QB list.

Through week 4 you act like Luck hasn't been just as good if not better than some of these QBs so far

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Through week 4 you act like Luck hasn't been just as good if not better than some of these QBs so far

He hasn't.

I would put him in the middle of the road.... 15-17 or so. There is not a scale, formula, etc, for it to be accurate would rank him #1.

You are taking my belittling the system as a shot at Luck. It is not a hot at the players that it ranks erroneously. It is a shot at the system itself.

Andrew Luck has not played close to being ranked #1 in the NFL. He's not been the best rookie QB to start with, so it's impossible for him to be #1 in the NFL. Again, not a shot at him. A shot at ESPN and their create-a-stat QBR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one thing that sticks out about Luck like a sore thumb is that he has one of the lowest completion rates in the NFL. No one doubts that the guy is the total package skills-wise but when it comes to something like QBR, I can't help but suspect that Luck's play is at least partially responsible for the number of clutch play opportunities he has. In fact, the entire Colts team probably shares a role in playing just barely well enough to give Luck opportunities in the clutch and the exact same could be said for the Redskins defense and RGIII.

It's just not a very good stat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QBR is a really good stat. Only thing is, its not a very good indicator game to game, best to look at it long term, where it shows its colors. Anyone saying this stat doesnt mean anything, please look at the highest QBR seasons. Its almost spot on.

Luck has been outplaying RG3, as I believe John Clayton pointed out, he has one of the highest completions of 20+. Also pointed out there is a difference between throwing the ball 10 yards, an letting your wideout run 30, and throwing the ball 40 yards in the air. There is a reason Luck has the highest QBR right now, if he can maintain it is the question. He is easily playing like a Top 10 right now. I call it like I see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He hasn't.

I would put him in the middle of the road....* 15-17 or so.*There is not a scale, formula, etc, for it to be accurate would rank him #1.

Well if you look at his Passing Efficiency rating, he's 20th. He also has the 5 th least amount of plays played and its only 4 weeks in. Some very good QBs have had some bad stats early, like Rodgers getting sacked 6 times for example. Luck hasn't really had any crazy stats like that affecting his QBR. Maybe he's really been the most efficient QB , overall but not strictly passing wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if you look at his Passing Efficiency rating, he's 20th. He also has the 5 th least amount of plays played and its only 4 weeks in. Some very good QBs have had some bad stats early, like Rodgers getting sacked 6 times for example. Luck hasn't really had any crazy stats like that affecting his QBR. Maybe he's really been the most efficient QB , overall but not strictly passing wise.

I would say the ranking of 20 is closer to being more accurate than the ranking of 1, but I would say that is too low.

It is a small sample size, I'll give you that.

To me Luck @ #1 on that list just doesn't pass the eye ball test. Again, a knock on the system and not the player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say the ranking of 20 is closer to being more accurate than the ranking of 1, but I would say that is too low.

It is a small sample size, I'll give you that.

To me Luck @ #1 on that list just doesn't pass the eye ball test. Again, a knock on the system and not the player.

I know your just knocking the system but your not seeing the same because you want to rate him on passing alone ( in which you and the rating system are close), the QBR is trying to weigh everything though. IMO it's try to show the difference in QBs when under duress . Do they throw the ball away, do they get sacked, do they turn it over, or do they keep the keep the play alive and make plays. Luck has been awesome making plays while under duress, hasn't been sacked much and hasn't thrown many Ints. Then compound that with his play at the end of games and they're behind.

I think Luck's game is just natural for a high QBR, especially when playing from behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know your just knocking the system but your not seeing the same because you want to rate him on passing alone ( in which you and the rating system are close), the QBR is trying to weigh everything though. IMO it's try to show the difference in QBs when under duress . Do they throw the ball away, do they get sacked, do they turn it over, or do they keep the keep the play alive and make plays. Luck has been awesome making plays while under duress, hasn't been sacked much and hasn't thrown many Ints. Then compound that with his play at the end of games and they're behind.

I think Luck's game is just natural for a high QBR, especially when playing from behind.

No I wouldn't say I'm trying to rate on passing alone. Far more goes into quarterbacking. Some things that lead to great quarterbacking can never be quantified in a formula.

I understand what it claims to be trying to do.

I think it just fails at pulling that off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say the ranking of 20 is closer to being more accurate than the ranking of 1, but I would say that is too low.

It is a small sample size, I'll give you that.

To me Luck @ #1 on that list just doesn't pass the eye ball test. Again, a knock on the system and not the player.

He may not be numero uno or even a top 15, but boy what Jets fans would do for a future of Andrew Luck, ahahah!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I wouldn't say I'm trying to rate on passing alone. Far more goes into quarterbacking. Some things that lead to great quarterbacking can never be quantified in a formula.

I understand what it claims to be trying to do.

I think it just fails at pulling that off.

It might be failing, who do you think is the most efficient QB after 3 games? No 1 QB has really stuck out for me, it seems all QBs have had some struggles early this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might be failing, who do you think is the most efficient QB after 3 games? No 1 QB has really stuck out for me, it seems all QBs have had some struggles early this season.

In the games I've watched and I watch quite a bit(aka too much) I would say that Matt Ryan has played by far the best football. He's 2 or 3 in QBR, and 1 in Passing efficiency.

He's played better than BBR, Rodgers, Brady, Brees, Manning/Manning, Flacco, etc. I commend ESPN for trying. It just seems to have some flaws.... A small sample size doesn't help. For them not having their minions take it back in history is another failing point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a discussion about this a few days ago.

QBR isn't a true rating of a QB. Although it's great to see Luck on top of a QB ranking, we also have to realize that this list isn't as credible or doesn't deserve as much merit as a passer rating list, for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the games I've watched and I watch quite a bit(aka too much) I would say that Matt Ryan has played by far the best football. He's 2 or 3 in QBR, and 1 in Passing efficiency.

He's played better than BBR, Rodgers, Brady, Brees, Manning/Manning, Flacco, etc. I commend ESPN for trying. It just seems to have some flaws.... A small sample size doesn't help. For them not having their minions take it back in history is another failing point.

Most of those guys should be in front of Luck but almost all had a game with some black eye of a stat that's screwing with the QBR. Matt Ryan is a good choice for alternate. I think it will pass the eye test more and more as the season goes on and yeah I doesn't help that it's such a hard rating to figure out. The regular passing rating is kinda easy to guess just looking at completion%, yards thrown, and TDs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a discussion about this a few days ago.

QBR isn't a true rating of a QB. Although it's great to see Luck on top of a QB ranking, we also have to realize that this list isn't as credible or doesn't deserve as much merit as a passer rating list, for example.

True. But I'll take it and weigh it against the passer rating and the eyeball test. It's just another way to rate but not the best way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eye test....Billy Kilmer vs Fran Tarkenton?

Provide QBR: Uninterested ::)

All QBs are an injury away! I think, and sadly so for my Texan fans.....Shaub will go down again.

We have a 245 lb linebacker with a neckbeard.....sometimes :)

QBR is a WORTHLESS statistic made for zero reason other than to make good QBs look better......and to minimize the abilities of new QBs......JAWS has JAWS for a reason! :) QBR is ludicrous!!!!!!!!!!!!

Luck is not number one....not even close...and I LOVE number 12!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a discussion about this a few days ago.

QBR isn't a true rating of a QB. Although it's great to see Luck on top of a QB ranking, we also have to realize that this list isn't as credible or doesn't deserve as much merit as a passer rating list, for example.

the qbr def has flaws, but the standard passer rating isn't much better......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take any team in the league, bring the top 10 most talented QB's in the league into their camp. Give them all the same number of snaps and let them battle it out all summer with the same lineman, receivers, defense, coaches, etc and the best QB will emerge over the others. That's the best way to tell because you eliminate most of the variables. Nobody will say "Yeah, but he has Megatron to throw to or he has better pass blocking lineman, etc...."Now, the style of play could affect the outcome, but you can't control everything. In the end, I think the team would respond to one guy over the rest whoever that may be. Ah, fantasy world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to clarify I'm not saying he has played better than any of those qbs because he hasn't. He's been more impressive IMO than rg3 just because rg3 has a great team around him and he dumps the ball off and his WR do all the work. Redskins also have a great running game which can be rookies best friend. Luck is working with no run game and really no protection. I've been more than impressed with how he is able to escape the pocket and make plays. His awareness in the pocket is great. There have been times when a rusher is coming up behind him and he just feels that pressure and escapes before the sack. So whether its qbr or just qb rating I don't think it's very accurate. The numbers don't take into account what he has to work with and his overall skill set that he is displaying every week. But it is cool to see him at the top even though its probably not accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It’s hard to get a read from Ballard's presser. It almost seemed liked he co-signed his young DB room and said they’re just going to roll the dice with what they have but maybe add some competition. I get that he feels they can take a leap, but I’m not sure I can be convinced that Flowers or Jones will ever be better than Quinyon Mitchell or Cooper DeJean.   Of all of Ballard’s philosophies regarding team building (specifically related to the draft) the one I have the most issue with is the over confidence and eagerness to bank on low round players and UDFA’s as long term solutions. You have a projected starting secondary consisting a 7th round pick from Yale who did not play well last season, a 7th round corner who well outplayed his draft position, but has clear limitations athletically, a 3rd round safety who is gifted athletically, but we still don’t know if he’s better as FS or SS, and a 2nd round pick who showed great flashes when healthy but is still a question mark.    I get rolling the dice with JuJu, but I don’t see why you wouldn’t look for upgrades for Thomas and Jones/Flowers. I know he said he’d like to add competition there, but drafting a guy 4th round likely isn’t going to give your CB group a boost. I know he said they’re technically not young in his eyes, but they are young. If you’re going to add another “young” corner, add one with high end traits and skills. I’m not dead set on Mitchell or DeJean in round 1 or bust because I also like a couple day 2 corners. I’m just saying I’d much rather take a shot with one of them than just run it back with the same group.   Where we really need talent at for sure though is Edge.
    • This place will implode no matter what. 
    • On DB: Q: "Are you worried you're too young?" A: "No, not anymore, they've grown up."
    • Ballard on character: "Who they are is important. ... We're dealing with young men here, who are not fully developed into men yet. We're talking about 20, 21, 22 year old young men that make mistakes... and I can live with some of those mistakes. ... But to me... when they fail is when they don't love the game. ... You've been around players who are not fully mature off the field, but on the field, they love football, so they're gonna do everything in their power to get better. ... And it's the hardest part to figure out. ... How are they gonna handle their time, cause they've got more of it, and how are they gonna handle their money. ... The hardest thing is getting the character right. ... There's a lot of times we'll pass on guys in the draft and I know people freak out... well there's usually something we found out or didn't like and we ended up passing. It wasn't a good fit for us, it might be a good fit for somebody else and they might make it work, but for us it wasn't."   Football character. 
    • The one thing that scares me about elite wrs is that 4 years later u r paying them 30 mill plus. U have to consider that if u going to trade up for one of the elite guys. I would prefer a role wr who can be replaced if and when his  2nd contract comes around. Say get a guy like Worthy and u r scheming him to get open. That's where a guy like Bowers is in some ways a better pick if u want to move up. Not nearly as expensive long term based on te salaries and he  is a true weapon.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...