Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

polians_pundit

Over/Under

18 posts in this topic

Im looking for a concensus over/under on this years numbers.

1.) Luck TD passes 24

2.) Luck INT's 15

3.) Freeney Sacks 9

4.) Mathis Sacks 9

5.) Davis INT's 3

6.) Brown Rush yards 800

7.) Ballard Rush yards 600

8.) Wayne reception 75

9.) Wayne TD's 9

10) Yes or No. Pick up the Deuce that Seattle dropped, LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im looking for a concensus over/under on this years numbers.

1.) Luck TD passes 24 OVER

2.) Luck INT's 15 OVER

3.) Freeney Sacks 9 UNDER

4.) Mathis Sacks 9 OVER

5.) Davis INT's 3 OVER

6.) Brown Rush yards 800 UNDER

7.) Ballard Rush yards 600 OVER

8.) Wayne reception 75 OVER

9.) Wayne TD's 9 OVER

10) Yes or No. Pick up the Deuce that Seattle dropped, LOL NO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im looking for a concensus over/under on this years numbers.

1.) Luck TD passes 24

2.) Luck INT's 15

3.) Freeney Sacks 9

4.) Mathis Sacks 9

5.) Davis INT's 3

6.) Brown Rush yards 800

7.) Ballard Rush yards 600

8.) Wayne reception 75

9.) Wayne TD's 9

10) Yes or No. Pick up the Deuce that Seattle dropped, LOL

1. PUSH

2. PUSH

3. LESS

4. LESS

5. PUSH

6. LESS

7. LESS

8. PUSH

9. LESS

10. NO

PUSH = SAME

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I'm lost, are these your Predictions for this year????

he's wanting you to guess if the player will have more than (over) the number he laid out or less than (under) or if you think it will be what he just said it's a push.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

he's wanting you to guess if the player will have more than (over) the number he laid out or less than (under) or if you think it will be what he just said it's a push.

Ahh, understood lol. Sorry, my mind is on wandering mode right now. Watching Film from the Rams & Steelers Game

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.) Luck TD passes 24- Over

2.) Luck INT's 15- Under

3.) Freeney Sacks 9- Under

4.) Mathis Sacks 9- Over

5.) Davis INT's 3- Push

6.) Brown Rush yards 800- Under if the O-line plays like they did recently. Over if they don't

7.) Ballard Rush yards 600- Push

8.) Wayne reception 75- Under

9.) Wayne TD's 9- Over (Go to Guy in the Red Zone for the Fade routes that Luck will work on imo)

10) Yes or No. Pick up the Deuce that Seattle dropped, LOL- NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im looking for a concensus over/under on this years numbers.

1.) Luck TD passes 24 ~ Over

2.) Luck INT's 15 ~ Under

3.) Freeney Sacks 9 ~ Under

4.) Mathis Sacks 9 ~ Over

5.) Davis INT's 3 ~ Over

6.) Brown Rush yards 800 ~ Over

7.) Ballard Rush yards 600 ~ Over

8.) Wayne reception 75 ~ Over

9.) Wayne TD's 9 ~ Over

10) Yes or No. Pick up the Deuce that Seattle dropped, LOL ~ No! Wait until the final cut

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.) Push

2.) Over

3.) Under

4.) Under

5.) Over

6.) Under

7.) Over

8.) Over

9.) Under

10) No

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.) Luck TD passes 24 - Over

2.) Luck INT's 15 - Over

3.) Freeney Sacks 9 - Under

4.) Mathis Sacks 9 - Under

5.) Davis INT's 3 - Over

6.) Brown Rush yards 800 - Push

7.) Ballard Rush yards 600 - Over

8.) Wayne reception 75 - Over

9.) Wayne TD's 9 - Under

10) Yes or No. Pick up the Deuce that Seattle dropped, LOL - Yes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets add another one.

11.) Different combinations of starting O line. 5

I think we are going to have to get help on the line, picking up the deuce might open up some of the holes for brown. Thats too funny

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im looking for a concensus over/under on this years numbers.

1.) Luck TD passes 24

2.) Luck INT's 15

3.) Freeney Sacks 9

4.) Mathis Sacks 9

5.) Davis INT's 3

6.) Brown Rush yards 800

7.) Ballard Rush yards 600

8.) Wayne reception 75

9.) Wayne TD's 9

10) Yes or No. Pick up the Deuce that Seattle dropped, LOL

1. Over

2. Under

3. Over

4. Over

5. Over

6. Under

7. Under

8. Over

9. Under

10. Sure

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.) Luck TD passes 24 -- push

2.) Luck INT's 15 -- under

3.) Freeney Sacks 9 -- over

4.) Mathis Sacks 9 -- under

5.) Davis INT's 3 -- over

6.) Brown Rush yards 800 -- over

7.) Ballard Rush yards 600 -- under

8.) Wayne reception 75 -- over

9.) Wayne TD's 9 -- under

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.) Luck TD passes 24 - Under

2.) Luck INT's 15 - Under

3.) Freeney Sacks 9 - Under

4.) Mathis Sacks 9 - Over

5.) Davis INT's 3 - Under

6.) Brown Rush yards 800 - Under

7.) Ballard Rush yards 600 - Over

8.) Wayne reception 75 - Over

9.) Wayne TD's 9 - Under

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im looking for a concensus over/under on this years numbers.

1.) Luck TD passes 24

2.) Luck INT's 15

3.) Freeney Sacks 9

4.) Mathis Sacks 9

5.) Davis INT's 3

6.) Brown Rush yards 800

7.) Ballard Rush yards 600

8.) Wayne reception 75

9.) Wayne TD's 9

10) Yes or No. Pick up the Deuce that Seattle dropped, LOL

1.) Over

2.) Push

3.) Under

4.) Under

5.) Push

6.) Under

7.) Over

8.) Over

9.) Under

10.) No

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    •   I think Dawkins would be fine with pick 46 in the 2nd round.     But with pick 15 in the 1st?!?       No!     Oh, heck no!!     He's a very strong candidate to be a very solid guard,  but pick 15?     And instead of Lamp at 15 who was still available?      No!    No!    No!    
    •   Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something here,  but what does this mean?     I'm cutting and pasting......     PFF Offensive Line Rankings- Colts Ranked 25th Overall- The most interesting bit of information from this was that they felt Castonzo had a really strong year, and that our original starting 5 were far superior to ANY combination we used when we had to account for injuries.   If that implies that our OL toward the beginning of the season graded out better than our OL the last 7 games of the season did when the C/RG/RT was Kelly, Haeg and Clark,  then I'm afraid I'm going to have to call nonsense on that viewpoint.    The OL was much better down the stretch...    and the stats including both far fewer sacks of Andrew Luck and a solid running game for Gore backs that up.   So,  what am I not understanding?     Have I misunderstood something?    Can someone throw me a bone here?   What's going on?     Clearly, I'm not understanding their meaning....    
    • I think we steal Foster at 15 if he's there. The kid was a top 5 talent and the best prospect at ILB since Kuechly just a few weeks ago. There's been a lot that's if things happen but the tape has not changed.    I think we go Reddick and maybe even Harris at 15. Conley is solid but not special. 
    •   You dont think that Haeg or Good could fix those issues?
    •   I don't doubt that all of those things are true.    But I think some NFL staffs are going to see most of those issues as very correctable.     They can be coached up.   But here's what can't be coached up.    Nearly 6'4" and 220+ pounds.    4.4 speed and about 43 inches in the vertical and nearly 11 feet in the broad jump.     And I think he did well at the various shuttles.    Those numbers are freaky.    They're likely the best at the combine.     So,  while I think most teams will likely agree with your assessment,   I think some teams (less than 8 or 25%)  will see first round physical qualities and see a late 1st round pick....   somewhere between 25-32...   Odds are he gets picked in the first half of the 2nd round...   somewhere before 50.     I just wouldn't be shocked if somehow he sneaks in to the late 1st....  
  • Welcome New Members

  • Members

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.