The worst part of the thing is that you have to have Indisputable Evidence to overturn the call on the field of TD. Meaning you had to have evidence he did not have control of the ball when he hit the pylon....not the other way around that it was called a touchback and he had to have evidence that he had the ball. Sure the ball shuffled around but he clearly had it when he touched the pylon. Even if they couldn't see he had it when he touched the pylon they had to have evidence he DID NOT HAVE IT when he touched the pylon....not that he lost it but couldn't confirm he regained it before touching the pylon. They really outsmarted themselves there on that call....or shown how dumb they are....or worse if they had a bias in the NFL offices. I'm sure NE probably still wins the game because they are a better team than NY but man that changed the outcome completely after that. Just to shed some more light to the term Indisputable...here are the synonyms for the word:
incontrovertible, incontestable, undeniable, irrefutable, beyond dispute, unassailable, unquestionable, beyond question, indubitable, not in doubt, beyond doubt, beyond a shadow of a doubt, unarguable, airtight, watertight)
Does anyone...anyone think that applies to this call that they had enough evidence to overturn it??? Yeah that was just awful call. The fact it favored NE....well I'm sure others have a conspiracy theory on that one....I'm just upset they really screwed it up no matter what team it affected. Someone in NY should be suspended over that call...they clearly need to go back to training on what they are looking for.