First, he was giving his legal opinion. It was definitely based on fact, but his legal opinion could very well be swayed by his location and his views on the situation. Throughout the article he had a few items and particulars incorrect according to multiple reports. I am sure that you can find differing opinions on the matter. This person is not the sole authority, since this would be a civil case there are many different avenues to explore if you wanted. In other words, just because this guy says that the Colts have no recourse doesn't necessarily make it so which is why I made the joke.