Forums

That is a good point but they have been saying that about our OL for some time and that has resulted in it being a top 5 OL.  Not on the same scale but we now have two highly paid DT in their 30’s.   If we acquired Hunter we most likely would have had a highly paid DL position group as well.  I am not in the camp of worrying about how much we pay a player or position group.  That’s for the front office to manage.  They have a roster to build to try and a win a championship. That’s a lot of players and talent to deal with.  I am in the camp of bringing in the best players we can to get the job done.  As long as they manage the cap effectively, which they do, then I don’t care where they spend it.  Just bring in the talent and go for that championship.

It's amazing how two people can watch the same thing and come to very different conclusions. Last year, the Colts defense was mediocre at best.

Deficiencies on D? Give me a break. This defense is more than good enough in an offensive league to win games. Defense was not the Colts problem last year.    The issue seems to be that you think the NFL still cares about defense and low scoring games. Offense need playmakers and the defense just needs to hang on.    Getting a stud offensive play maker would easily move this teams needle far more than adding a stud defensive player.    The most important position on this team is quarterback, agree? What do you do to help the most important position out? Surround him with talent at play making positions.    Anyone who doesn’t look at the transformation of Jalen Hurts getting AJ Brown or Josh Allen getting Diggs or Burrow having Chase as a good comparison for AR needs to remember what’s important in todays NFL, scoring points.