Passing game was the biggest plus
#1
Posted 12 August 2012 - 06:04 PM
he throws a soft ball..easy to catch...
..and both backup QBs threw the ball well...
Our receivers ran good routes even if they didnt make every catch.
Without a big time pass attack....we cant win games...where we play and against who we play
This was the best thing i saw....
.....seriously, we didnt score 38 points in TWO games last season...
#2
Posted 12 August 2012 - 06:14 PM
#3
Posted 12 August 2012 - 06:18 PM
I honestly believe that the Colts would have won 9 or 10 games last year with Luck instead of Collins/Painter/Orlovsky. They lost alot of close games with poor QB play.
He is very calm...(probabaly because his dad played inthe NFL..he expceted to be here since he was a kid)
.and he can run aay from rushers.....
If we can protect him (a big if) ..we'll score a lot of points...and we wont be the embarassment we were last year
#4
Posted 12 August 2012 - 06:21 PM
#5
Posted 12 August 2012 - 06:24 PM
With Bruce Arians as OC, did you seriously believe we were going to install a Stanford offense primarily? I did not.
Yeah, neither did I. Stanford ran that offense because that's where their strength was (ie top notch RBs and TEs, mediocre WRs). Luck is good enough that the passing game can be opened up. Today's game is evidence enough of that, I think.
#6
Posted 12 August 2012 - 06:24 PM
#7
Posted 12 August 2012 - 06:28 PM
Tackling was MUCH improved.
Aldous Huxley
#8
Posted 12 August 2012 - 06:28 PM
.........on the play where he was looking to get sacked from his right but turned and ran left and threw it away...I think Peyton would have lost that battle....having the mobility and knowing how to use it is going to be a great asset..He is very calm...(probabaly because his dad played inthe NFL..he expceted to be here since he was a kid)
.and he can run aay from rushers.....
If we can protect him (a big if) ..we'll score a lot of points...and we wont be the embarassment we were last year
#9
Posted 12 August 2012 - 06:30 PM
The Colts had 30 passes. They also ran the ball 32 times. We threw plenty of short and medium passes. I realize a fair amount of that is building a big lead and then sitting on it and running out the clock. But we made them respect the run.
The offense you saw today, didn't look that much different than what Stanford runs. But the receivers here are MUCH better than what Stanford has, and that allows Luck to do much more than he could in college.
But there are certain principles at work here.... high percentage passes... mostly 3 and 5 step pass drops. Keep the chains moving. Pound the defense and at least make them respect the run.
It's a winning formula. By the way, I thought Arians called a heckuva game today. Other than Luck, he's likely the best off-season move we made!! Really. Seriously. The Colts' gain is Pittsburgh's big loss.
#10
Posted 12 August 2012 - 06:32 PM
...........I agree. The Colts would line up and I would say "What is that?"...Those offensive formations sure look weird to me. They just seem so jumbled. It's nice that Arians likes to mix things up. I liked what Sorgi said about how Pittsburgh would bring out 3 TE sets at the end of games and just keep pounding the rock.....definitely beats the 3 Wide set we'd try to run out of to close out games.
#11
Posted 12 August 2012 - 06:37 PM
And Andrew Luck had a little no huddle offense going in one of them drives. He has total command of the offense. He is ahead of the game when it comes to all the other rookies heck some of the 2nd and 3rd year players tooAndrew Luck obviously threw the ball well..and didnt really miss anyone (we dropped a few)
he throws a soft ball..easy to catch...
..and both backup QBs threw the ball well...
Our receivers ran good routes even if they didnt make every catch.
Without a big time pass attack....we cant win games...where we play and against who we play
This was the best thing i saw....
.....seriously, we didnt score 38 points in TWO games last season...
#12
Posted 12 August 2012 - 06:40 PM
#13
Posted 12 August 2012 - 06:45 PM
#14
Posted 12 August 2012 - 06:52 PM
For those of you keeping score at home (and if you are, good for you!
) know this....
The Colts had 30 passes. They also ran the ball 32 times. We threw plenty of short and medium passes. I realize a fair amount of that is building a big lead and then sitting on it and running out the clock. But we made them respect the run.
The offense you saw today, didn't look that much different than what Stanford runs. But the receivers here are MUCH better than what Stanford has, and that allows Luck to do much more than he could in college.
But there are certain principles at work here.... high percentage passes... mostly 3 and 5 step pass drops. Keep the chains moving. Pound the defense and at least make them respect the run.
It's a winning formula. By the way, I thought Arians called a heckuva game today. Other than Luck, he's likely the best off-season move we made!! Really. Seriously. The Colts' gain is Pittsburgh's big loss.
Solid post!
I agree about Arians...it's crazy how much the Steelers fans turned against him though. The ones I've been hearing from basically scapegoated Arians for all their issues and think Big Ben, Wallace, and co. were Pro Bowlers and won 2 Super Bowls despite him, not because of him. I get the feeling they're going to be in for a rude awakening this year when the offense underperforms and they see Arians wasn't the problem.
#15
Posted 12 August 2012 - 09:16 PM
With Bruce Arians as OC, did you seriously believe we were going to install a Stanford offense primarily? I did not.
I didnt buy the 'ground and pound' talk.....no
Andrew Luck is not hamburger...you dont ground and pound with him...
#16
Posted 12 August 2012 - 09:17 PM
And Andrew Luck had a little no huddle offense going in one of them drives. He has total command of the offense. He is ahead of the game when it comes to all the other rookies heck some of the 2nd and 3rd year players too
I guess that's what they meant by 'NFL-ready'
#17
Posted 12 August 2012 - 09:21 PM
I didnt buy the 'ground and pound' talk.....no
Andrew Luck is not hamburger...you dont ground and pound with him...
Personally, I think Luck, because of his mobility, might take a few more sacks than Peyton but might throw fewer INTs, IMO.
I think he may also get more leeway than Peyton did in his year 1 towards the end of year 1.
#18
Posted 12 August 2012 - 10:26 PM
I know people are sayng it's the Preseason and it was the Rams... but it was more than the score.. it was against an NFL defense. For basically 2 rookie Qbs to come out and look like they have been there before was the part that should be looked at.
This post is brought to you today by Qdoba!
#19
Posted 12 August 2012 - 10:28 PM
I guess that's what they meant by 'NFL-ready'
I'm not sure the NFL is ready for him though.

#20
Posted 12 August 2012 - 11:55 PM















A limited number of season tickets are available