NFL pondering expansion of playoffs
#1
Posted 12 December 2012 - 09:27 PM
#2
Posted 12 December 2012 - 09:31 PM
May the odds be ever in the Colts favor.
#3
Posted 12 December 2012 - 09:32 PM
Get rid of the bye week all together move it to 16 teams. Since the high schools are finished playing there is no worry about playing on a Friday night.
8 games in wild card weekend
1 on Friday
3 on saturday
3 on sunday
1 on Monday
or
2 on Friday
3 on Sat
3 on Sun
#4
Posted 12 December 2012 - 09:33 PM
Although... maybe best out of three... wins.... but that would be impossible.
#5
Posted 12 December 2012 - 09:35 PM
I'm all for it.
Get rid of the bye week all together move it to 16 teams. Since the high schools are finished playing there is no worry about playing on a Friday night.
8 games in wild card weekend
1 on Friday
3 on saturday
3 on sunday
1 on Monday
or
2 on Friday
3 on Sat
3 on Sun
That is half the league, FJC. It is like the NBA then.
What is the reward for getting the best 2 records then?
I'd be fine with 14 teams, to be honest because 1 and only 1 team deserves the bye, the best one in the conference.
So, we will have 6 games on wild card weekend, 3 on Saturday, 3 on Sunday with 2 teams on bye.
#6
Posted 12 December 2012 - 09:45 PM
Thata boy Goodell keep trying to add to your ridiculous reign of foolishness as Commish
#7
Posted 12 December 2012 - 10:02 PM
I mean yeah lets let more crap in the playoffs even if they finish with 7 or 8 wins. With this way we could get this years Jets in somehow which would probably make the league squeal like little girls since it's a NY team. Or even everyone's favorite the Saints could be alive and kicking to get into the playoffs.
May the odds be ever in the Colts favor.
#8
Posted 12 December 2012 - 10:14 PM
Expanding it to 7 in each conference ensures only 1 team is privileged with the bye week because there is truly only 1 homefield advantage throughout the playoffs. It will still be 14 out of 32 teams that would make it 43% of the teams.
#9
Posted 12 December 2012 - 10:16 PM
That is half the league, FJC. It is like the NBA then.
What is the reward for getting the best 2 records then?
I'd be fine with 14 teams, to be honest because 1 and only 1 team deserves the bye, the best one in the conference.
So, we will have 6 games on wild card weekend, 3 on Saturday, 3 on Sunday with 2 teams on bye.
That's just how much I detest the bye week.
I can promise you there would be 1 & 2 seeds taking opening round losses...
#10
Posted 12 December 2012 - 11:56 PM
#11
Posted 13 December 2012 - 01:08 AM
Its not perfect by any means, but adding more playoff teams will water down the league. Jules said it perfectly in her post ..."I mean yeah lets let more crap in the playoffs even if they finish with 7 or 8 wins. With this way we could get this years Jets in somehow which would probably make the league squeal like little girls since it's a NY team. Or even everyone's favorite the Saints could be alive and kicking to get into the playoffs."
Teams should have to earn their way in...and 6-10, 7-9, and 8-8 (unless you win your division), shouldn't even be considered for the playoffs..
Proud to be a Colts fan this, and every year. Thank you for the great season!
#12
Posted 13 December 2012 - 01:24 AM
its not T.Y its T.watttttttttt WHAT DID T JUST DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#13
Posted 13 December 2012 - 04:30 AM
I understand, that Goodell would deliver more football to fans (and more income from marketing and broadcast to the League), but IMO it would decrease the quality.
Playoffs could be extended by deciding wild card games in 2 games (1 home, 1 away, in case of 1-1 a third game @ tiebreaker's home-field) and eliminating bye week.
#CHUCKSTRONG
#14
Posted 13 December 2012 - 09:22 AM
#15
Posted 13 December 2012 - 09:53 AM
Go to heaven for the climate, Go to he (double hockey-sticks) for the company.
#16
Posted 13 December 2012 - 10:44 AM
It's bad enough that we usually see at least one .500 team come in as a wildcard. Can you imagine how much it would suck for the sport if a 7-9 team made it in and somehow pulled off an improbable Super Bowl run? Having .500 teams qualify for the post season is bad enough... I'd prefer to see the NFL leave this as-is. Just my opinion.
#17
Posted 13 December 2012 - 11:31 AM
#18
Posted 13 December 2012 - 11:35 AM
bill polian just made a good case for expanding the playoff to 14 teams on espn radio.
Its actually an obvious idea..
2 teams get bye weeks and all you would do is eliminate the byes....
More money for TV...more for owners..and (at the next CBA negotiations) more for players..
It will happen..
#19
Posted 13 December 2012 - 11:36 AM
Monetary reasons, pure and simple. I love this league, but if there is a way they can make money, they will do it without regard to integrity of the game, player safety, and fan reaction. They want to put an NFL team in Europe....nuff said.
what business doesn't try to make more money?
#20
Posted 13 December 2012 - 11:38 AM
The flip side of staying at 6 is there will be lots of occasions where teams with 10+ wins will be left out of the playoffs (Bucs and Giants in 2010). So expanding it to 7 may not be as bad. This is the reason why:
Expanding it to 7 in each conference ensures only 1 team is privileged with the bye week because there is truly only 1 homefield advantage throughout the playoffs. It will still be 14 out of 32 teams that would make it 43% of the teams.
I think its a good idea....
..and player safety has nothing to do with it,...a 12-team playoff and a 14-team playoff takes the same amount of time.
..and only 2 teams are playing one more game...
players have to stop whining about playing more....they all want to get paid more..but they say playing is too dangerous.
More games means more jobs
Either you do want to play in the NFL or you dont...
#21
Posted 13 December 2012 - 12:04 PM
PFT has a poll up at 71% want no change.
13% want 14 teams
16% want 16 teams
I didn't see similar polls on ESPN.com or NFL.com.
#22
Posted 13 December 2012 - 12:13 PM
Seems like a way to get more money for the league while potentially damaging the integrity of the game by likely rewarding 500 or slightly worse teams into the playoffs on a fairly regular basis and leaving them with fairly high draft pick as well,
Thata boy Goodell keep trying to add to your ridiculous reign of foolishness as Commish![]()
The intergrity of a game where union ballplayers in New Orleans are encouraged by their coaches to pay 'hit money' to disable other union ballplayers...?
That game? That integrity?
#23
Posted 13 December 2012 - 12:58 PM
Seems like a way to get more money for the league while potentially damaging the integrity of the game by likely rewarding 500 or slightly worse teams into the playoffs on a fairly regular basis and leaving them with fairly high draft pick as well,
Thata boy Goodell keep trying to add to your ridiculous reign of foolishness as Commish![]()
Let's just look at the last 5 years to see what teams would be added to the playoffs.
Expanding to 14 teams
2011 NFC Chicago 8-8 & AFC Tennessee 9-7
2010 NFC NY Giants 10-6 & AFC San Diego 9-7
2009 NFC Atlanta 9-7 & AFC Houston 9-7
2008 NFC Tampa Bay 9-7 & AFC New England 11-5
2007 NFC Minnesota 8-8 & AFC Cleveland 10-6
Exapanding to 16 teams(the teams listed above and one additional team from each conference
2011 NFC Arizona 8-8 & AFC Jets 8-8
2010 NFC Tampa Bay 10-6 & AFC Jacksonville 8-8
2009 NFC Carolina 8-8 & AFC Pittsburgh 9-7
2008 NFC Dallas 9-7 & AFC Jets 9-7
2007 NFC Philadelphia 8-8 & AFC Houston 8-8
Expanding to 14 teams would have added:
1 11-5 team
2 10-6 teams
5 9-7 teams
2 8-8 teams
Expanding to 16 teams would have added
1 11-5 team
3 10-6 teams
8 9-7 teams
8 8-8 teams
Like I said in a previous post, I can promise you some of these teams would have advanced and who knows... One or more might even be wearing a ring.
If you go back to 2010, Seattle wins a weak west with a 7-9 record, while 2 10-6 teams are sitting at home in the NFC. That's how the cards fell. That 7-9 team surprisingly beat the defending Super Bowl Champions. It's the playoffs anything can happen. To me there is nothing wrong with more playoff games.
#24
Posted 13 December 2012 - 01:00 PM
..as long as no sub. 500s were added...more playoff games are a good thing
#25
Posted 13 December 2012 - 02:29 PM
This is my thoughts exactly. The NFL is more popular than its ever been, it doesn't need change rightnow. It's doesn't need more teams, more playoff seeds, or more games.Why don't they just stop looking/pondering into changing so much. Sigh.
#26
Posted 13 December 2012 - 02:39 PM
Let's just let every team in to the playoffs.
Oh, while we're at it, expand the regular season to 32 games. We're concerned about
I propose a new rule, Goodell can't propose any more changes for a minimum of five seasons and needs to LEAVE SUCH A BELOVED SPORT THE HECK ALONE.
#27
Posted 13 December 2012 - 02:57 PM
If you go back to 2010, Seattle wins a weak west with a 7-9 record, while 2 10-6 teams are sitting at home in the NFC. That's how the cards fell. That 7-9 team surprisingly beat the defending Super Bowl Champions. It's the playoffs anything can happen. To me there is nothing wrong with more playoff games.
can't remember the year sandy eggo won their division at 8-8. the wild card colts had to go there and lost
Go to heaven for the climate, Go to he (double hockey-sticks) for the company.
#28
Posted 13 December 2012 - 03:02 PM
can't remember the year sandy eggo won their division at 8-8. the wild card colts had to go there and lost
Anomalies happen(doesn't that sound like a t-shirt/bumper sticker)
#29
Posted 13 December 2012 - 03:03 PM
Anomalies happen(doesn't that sound like a t-shirt/bumper sticker)
... They won their division. There has to be some form of reward for that... I would have liked to play that game in Indy, but so be it.
i totally agree. it makes winning the division the primary goal in the regular season, and the game is better for it
Go to heaven for the climate, Go to he (double hockey-sticks) for the company.
#30
Posted 13 December 2012 - 05:32 PM
#31
Posted 13 December 2012 - 06:21 PM
PrincetonTiger77
#32
Posted 13 December 2012 - 06:39 PM

#33
Posted 13 December 2012 - 07:06 PM

#34
Posted 13 December 2012 - 07:21 PM
I can understand you wouldn't mind seeing more football but IMO the playoffs need to stay more exclusive, more of a challenging goal. I don't ever wanna see a .500 team making the playoffs.I'm all for it.
Get rid of the bye week all together move it to 16 teams. Since the high schools are finished playing there is no worry about playing on a Friday night.
8 games in wild card weekend
1 on Friday
3 on saturday
3 on sunday
1 on Monday
or
2 on Friday
3 on Sat
3 on Sun
#35
Posted 13 December 2012 - 08:25 PM
They will make sure they get their 34 team expansion with L.A. and another city, and looks like they are already looking ahead, might as well roll out the 18 game season too. All they care about is dolla dolla bill y'all. Stack a dolla, make it go cha-ching! $$$$$$$$$$$
#36
Posted 13 December 2012 - 08:30 PM
#37
Posted 13 December 2012 - 08:49 PM
#38
Posted 13 December 2012 - 09:15 PM
#39
Posted 13 December 2012 - 09:16 PM
I can understand you wouldn't mind seeing more football but IMO the playoffs need to stay more exclusive, more of a challenging goal. I don't ever wanna see a .500 team making the playoffs.
Umm...No. Leave it the way it is. I really don't want a team that's under .500 playing in the playoffs.
Basically the only way that would likely happen would be like Seattle from a couple of years ago, winning a division at 7-9. That year there were two 10-6 teams left out of the playoffs.
Since they won their division, they would have made the playoffs if they dialed it back to 4 teams per conference as long as they left it as the division champs making the playoffs.
I'm sure there could be a scenario where one could squeak in, but it would be fairly rare.
#40
Posted 13 December 2012 - 09:28 PM
lets expand it to 32 teams in the next 5-6 yrs. why not? Any team can beat any other team on any given day. That's why u play the game. Expanding the playoffs is totally crazy. Keep it at 12. Make them earn it. This is football not wussyballLet's just look at the last 5 years to see what teams would be added to the playoffs.
Expanding to 14 teams
2011 NFC Chicago 8-8 & AFC Tennessee 9-7
2010 NFC NY Giants 10-6 & AFC San Diego 9-7
2009 NFC Atlanta 9-7 & AFC Houston 9-7
2008 NFC Tampa Bay 9-7 & AFC New England 11-5
2007 NFC Minnesota 8-8 & AFC Cleveland 10-6
Exapanding to 16 teams(the teams listed above and one additional team from each conference
2011 NFC Arizona 8-8 & AFC Jets 8-8
2010 NFC Tampa Bay 10-6 & AFC Jacksonville 8-8
2009 NFC Carolina 8-8 & AFC Pittsburgh 9-7
2008 NFC Dallas 9-7 & AFC Jets 9-7
2007 NFC Philadelphia 8-8 & AFC Houston 8-8
Expanding to 14 teams would have added:
1 11-5 team
2 10-6 teams
5 9-7 teams
2 8-8 teams
Expanding to 16 teams would have added
1 11-5 team
3 10-6 teams
8 9-7 teams
8 8-8 teams
Like I said in a previous post, I can promise you some of these teams would have advanced and who knows... One or more might even be wearing a ring.
If you go back to 2010, Seattle wins a weak west with a 7-9 record, while 2 10-6 teams are sitting at home in the NFC. That's how the cards fell. That 7-9 team surprisingly beat the defending Super Bowl Champions. It's the playoffs anything can happen. To me there is nothing wrong with more playoff games.















A limited number of season tickets are available