NFL to investigate Arians for tampering
#1
Posted 29 November 2012 - 01:57 PM
#TeamMusclePharm #TeamMMAElite #TeamPraiseGod
12to87
#2
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:02 PM
Just saw they are going to investigate Arians for tampering because of his comments on suh. I don't understand why.
Link, please?
I've seen speculation from the mediots, but not the definitive statement that you reference.
Media:
http://profootballta...mpering-policy/
"The league has declined comment on whether Arians’ comments violate the anti-tampering policy."
#3
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:02 PM
#4
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:03 PM
Since Suh remains two years away from free agency, it’s not tampering in the classic sense. But it could be tampering in the literal sense.
The league’s anti-tampering policy prohibits “[a]ny public or private statement of interest, qualified or unqualified, in another club’s player . . . to a member of the news media.” The policy includes this specific example of a forbidden statement: “He’s an excellent player, and we’d very much like to have him if he were available, but another club holds his rights.”
#5
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:07 PM
Same thing.
#6
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:09 PM
#7
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:09 PM
thats exactly how I see itThat's nothing..Its like Rex saying..."who wouldnt want Peyton Manning?"/
Same thing.
#8
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:13 PM
#9
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:13 PM
Seems pretty cut and dried that what Arians said could be considered tampering if that's an example of it. Anybody know what the fine is for it? Is it just cash, or could we be out a draft pick?
Well, according to one commenter on that article, the punishment is that Suh will be allowed to use a baseball bat to cripple Andrew Luck on Sunday.
#10
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:13 PM
I just hope we don't lose a draft pick.
#11
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:15 PM
Yeah that comment had over 20 dislikes and 2 likes. Obviously he's biased against the Colts.Well, according to one commenter on that article, the punishment is that Suh will be allowed to use a baseball bat to cripple Andrew Luck on Sunday.
#12
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:16 PM
It's no big deal, but will likely end up with a fine anyway. They have rules like this for a reason, so if you have the rule in place it needs to be enforced, or nothing will prevent someone for doing something more serious.
It's a lot like that speeding ticket I got thrown out of court on Tuesday. It was just a waste of time.
#13
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:17 PM
“I’d love to have him on my team,” said Arians regarding Lions defensive tackle Ndamukon Suh. “I like the way he plays. He plays aggressive, hard, fast and physical.”
Since Suh remains two years away from free agency, it’s not tampering in the classic sense. But it could be tampering in the literal sense.
The league’s anti-tampering policy prohibits “[a]ny public or private statement of interest, qualified or unqualified, in another club’s player . . . to a member of the news media.” The policy includes this specific example of a forbidden statement: “He’s an excellent player, and we’d very much like to have him if he were available, but another club holds his rights.”
Yep, it's pretty clear he violated the rule to some extent. I hope they keep in mind the context of his statement.
#14
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:18 PM
Well, according to one commenter on that article, the punishment is that Suh will be allowed to use a baseball bat to cripple Andrew Luck on Sunday.
Well, since we're already on the hook for tampering, we may as well throw him an extra 100K to make it a whiffleball bat.
#15
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:19 PM
#16
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:21 PM
#17
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:24 PM
Are you serious?
#18
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:25 PM
#19
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:40 PM
Based on the rule and example given by the NFL he clearly violated the rule, but I don't believe there is any malicious intent or recruiting going on it. It was in response to Schaub saying he wouldn't want Suh on the Texans.
It's no big deal, but will likely end up with a fine anyway. They have rules like this for a reason, so if you have the rule in place it needs to be enforced, or nothing will prevent someone for doing something more serious.
It's a lot like that speeding ticket I got thrown out of court on Tuesday. It was just a waste of time.
On the other hand, this happens all the time. I've never seen this type of comment punished before, not that I can remember at least. Someone else mentioned Rex Ryan's comments about Peyton Manning, and there's many other examples.
#20
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:41 PM
- The NFL has not said they would investigate BA, so it's all speculation
- How could the NFL possibly do anything to BA after giving Suh no more than a trivial slap on the wrist after several years of dirty play?
- AND most important of all: What is BA thinking? Suh does NOT belong on the Colts! Can't believe Irsay would allow it.
#21
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:43 PM
#22
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:45 PM
Andrew Luck is the hero Indianapolis deserves, and the one it needs right now.
#23
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:45 PM
-____-
totally agree!
Go to heaven for the climate, Go to he (double hockey-sticks) for the company.
#24
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:48 PM
#25
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:49 PM
Go to heaven for the climate, Go to he (double hockey-sticks) for the company.
#26
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:50 PM
On the other hand, this happens all the time. I've never seen this type of comment punished before, not that I can remember at least. Someone else mentioned Rex Ryan's comments about Peyton Manning, and there's many other examples.
I guess it would all depend on exact quotes. I know that if I were Arians and I were fined then next week when asked about what are his thoughts about Chris Johnson or Jake Locker, I would be like. "Mr. Johnson & Mr. Locker are under contract with the Tennessee Titans, therefore NFL rules prohibit me from talking about a player under contract with another team". It would suck for the reporters, but it would prove a point. Then I would appeal the fine, and make it know that would be my stance for the rest of the season. "Mr. Schaub & Mr. Foster are under contract......"
In the least he might be fined 5-10k, but for those talking about losing draft picks, that is going a bit overboard.
#27
Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:53 PM
#28
Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:00 PM
Go to heaven for the climate, Go to he (double hockey-sticks) for the company.
#29
Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:02 PM
I will delete this when the new Colts win a Super Bowl.
#30
Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:28 PM
Just because he said he would love to have him on our team?
Heck, I would love to have Calvin Johnson on my fantasy team, is Goodell going to fine me now?
#31
Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:33 PM
#32
Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:40 PM
#33
Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:45 PM
- oh wait - the NFL won't let me say that or they'll fine me !!
Veteran Free Agency + NFL Draft = Time to Sign McAfee to a LONG-TERM Contract
#34
Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:45 PM
Lets Go Colts! ![]()
#35
Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:46 PM
#36
Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:46 PM
He had an offsides penalty in week 2 and that is it.In Suh's defense he had 1 penalty called on him all year according to Numbers Never Lie and that 500+ players have more personal foul penalties called on them than Suh this year
#37
Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:57 PM
#38
Posted 29 November 2012 - 04:00 PM
#39
Posted 29 November 2012 - 04:03 PM
I'm out of Likes today, bravo sir.It's stuff like this that makes me hate the NFL. You can't say "he's a great player who wouldn't want him", or "he's ten pounds of dog crap in a five pound bag." The league needs to be investigated for being ridiculous. A word of warning to all.... don't compliment women if they are married because it can be considered tampering because she "could" get divorced in two years.
#40
Posted 29 November 2012 - 04:37 PM
"The league has declined comment on whether Arians’ comments violate the anti-tampering policy."
I'd like to interpret this as "yeah, he technically did it... but we are letting him off with a verbal warning, maybe a fine."















A limited number of season tickets are available