Jump to content



 
Photo

NFL to investigate Arians for tampering


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
44 replies to this topic

#1 BuildTheMonster

BuildTheMonster

    Casey

  • Member
  • 1413 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 01:57 PM

Just saw they are going to investigate Arians for tampering because of his comments on suh. I don't understand why.
Colts,Pacers,Notre Dame and MMA
#TeamMusclePharm #TeamMMAElite #TeamPraiseGod
12to87

Get the NFL Game Pass Here!

#2 willysp

willysp
  • Member
  • 561 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:02 PM

Just saw they are going to investigate Arians for tampering because of his comments on suh. I don't understand why.


Link, please?

I've seen speculation from the mediots, but not the definitive statement that you reference.

Media:

http://profootballta...mpering-policy/

"The league has declined comment on whether Arians’ comments violate the anti-tampering policy."

#3 JoKeR

JoKeR

    CANT STOP CLAPPING!!!!!

  • Member
  • 5306 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:02 PM

What? We don't want a over rated temper tantrum.

#4 HtownColt

HtownColt
  • Member
  • 3180 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:03 PM

I’d love to have him on my team,” said Arians regarding Lions defensive tackle Ndamukon Suh. “I like the way he plays. He plays aggressive, hard, fast and physical.”
Since Suh remains two years away from free agency, it’s not tampering in the classic sense. But it could be tampering in the literal sense.
The league’s anti-tampering policy prohibits “[a]ny public or private statement of interest, qualified or unqualified, in another club’s player . . . to a member of the news media.” The policy includes this specific example of a forbidden statement: “He’s an excellent player, and we’d very much like to have him if he were available, but another club holds his rights.”

#5 oldunclemark

oldunclemark
  • Member
  • 8283 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:07 PM

That's nothing..Its like Rex saying..."who wouldnt want Peyton Manning?"/

Same thing.

#6 Hans Moleman

Hans Moleman
  • Member
  • 616 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:09 PM

Seems pretty cut and dried that what Arians said could be considered tampering if that's an example of it. Anybody know what the fine is for it? Is it just cash, or could we be out a draft pick?

#7 HtownColt

HtownColt
  • Member
  • 3180 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:09 PM

That's nothing..Its like Rex saying..."who wouldnt want Peyton Manning?"/

Same thing.

thats exactly how I see it

#8 JoKeR

JoKeR

    CANT STOP CLAPPING!!!!!

  • Member
  • 5306 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:13 PM

I doubting he gets punished for but I'm getting tired of the NFL stuff. The guy is 2 years away from FA, give me a break NFL. If you take away a draft pick, I will think the NFL is tampering.

#9 Warhawk

Warhawk
  • Member
  • 521 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:13 PM

Seems pretty cut and dried that what Arians said could be considered tampering if that's an example of it. Anybody know what the fine is for it? Is it just cash, or could we be out a draft pick?


Well, according to one commenter on that article, the punishment is that Suh will be allowed to use a baseball bat to cripple Andrew Luck on Sunday.

#10 The Fish

The Fish
  • Member
  • 1639 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:13 PM

Silly.

I just hope we don't lose a draft pick.
"My cats cat breath smells like cat food"

#11 JoKeR

JoKeR

    CANT STOP CLAPPING!!!!!

  • Member
  • 5306 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:15 PM

Well, according to one commenter on that article, the punishment is that Suh will be allowed to use a baseball bat to cripple Andrew Luck on Sunday.

Yeah that comment had over 20 dislikes and 2 likes. Obviously he's biased against the Colts.

#12 FireJimCaldwell

FireJimCaldwell
  • Member
  • 6076 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:16 PM

Based on the rule and example given by the NFL he clearly violated the rule, but I don't believe there is any malicious intent or recruiting going on it. It was in response to Schaub saying he wouldn't want Suh on the Texans.

It's no big deal, but will likely end up with a fine anyway. They have rules like this for a reason, so if you have the rule in place it needs to be enforced, or nothing will prevent someone for doing something more serious.

It's a lot like that speeding ticket I got thrown out of court on Tuesday. It was just a waste of time.

#13 Smonroe

Smonroe
  • Member
  • 3779 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:17 PM

I’d love to have him on my team,” said Arians regarding Lions defensive tackle Ndamukon Suh. “I like the way he plays. He plays aggressive, hard, fast and physical.”
Since Suh remains two years away from free agency, it’s not tampering in the classic sense. But it could be tampering in the literal sense.
The league’s anti-tampering policy prohibits “[a]ny public or private statement of interest, qualified or unqualified, in another club’s player . . . to a member of the news media.” The policy includes this specific example of a forbidden statement: “He’s an excellent player, and we’d very much like to have him if he were available, but another club holds his rights.”


Yep, it's pretty clear he violated the rule to some extent. I hope they keep in mind the context of his statement.

#14 Hans Moleman

Hans Moleman
  • Member
  • 616 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:18 PM

Well, according to one commenter on that article, the punishment is that Suh will be allowed to use a baseball bat to cripple Andrew Luck on Sunday.


Well, since we're already on the hook for tampering, we may as well throw him an extra 100K to make it a whiffleball bat.

#15 TKnight85

TKnight85
  • Member
  • 5257 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:19 PM

-____-

#16 gbrads_rants

gbrads_rants
  • Member
  • 554 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:21 PM

I'd like Suh to be on the other side of Redding...a D Line of Redding Chapman and Suh......my God.......MY GOD!!!! What a nightmare!

#17 Coltswarriors

Coltswarriors
  • Member
  • 1726 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:24 PM

LOL?

Are you serious?

#18 lollygagger8

lollygagger8
  • Member
  • 1632 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:25 PM

Suh kicks QB's square in the jewels, and Arians is getting investigated!??!?? What in the Roger Gooddell is going on around here?

#19 Superman

Superman
  • Forum Moderator
  • 7423 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:40 PM

Based on the rule and example given by the NFL he clearly violated the rule, but I don't believe there is any malicious intent or recruiting going on it. It was in response to Schaub saying he wouldn't want Suh on the Texans.

It's no big deal, but will likely end up with a fine anyway. They have rules like this for a reason, so if you have the rule in place it needs to be enforced, or nothing will prevent someone for doing something more serious.

It's a lot like that speeding ticket I got thrown out of court on Tuesday. It was just a waste of time.


On the other hand, this happens all the time. I've never seen this type of comment punished before, not that I can remember at least. Someone else mentioned Rex Ryan's comments about Peyton Manning, and there's many other examples.
LET'S HUNT

#20 willysp

willysp
  • Member
  • 561 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:41 PM

A few comments:
  • The NFL has not said they would investigate BA, so it's all speculation
  • How could the NFL possibly do anything to BA after giving Suh no more than a trivial slap on the wrist after several years of dirty play?
  • AND most important of all: What is BA thinking? Suh does NOT belong on the Colts! Can't believe Irsay would allow it.


#21 SteelCityColt

SteelCityColt
  • Member
  • 847 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:43 PM

Crazy, but by the rule quoted he has broken it. Still it's obvious that wasn't his intent, though maybe a little bit of psyche out before Sunday

#22 corgi

corgi
  • Member
  • 1078 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:45 PM

It's stuff like this that makes me hate the NFL. You can't say "he's a great player who wouldn't want him", or "he's ten pounds of dog crap in a five pound bag." The league needs to be investigated for being ridiculous. A word of warning to all.... don't compliment women if they are married because it can be considered tampering because she "could" get divorced in two years.

Andrew Luck is the hero Indianapolis deserves, and the one it needs right now.

 

 


#23 shakedownstreet

shakedownstreet
  • Member
  • 4293 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:45 PM

-____-


totally agree!

Go to heaven for the climate, Go to he (double hockey-sticks) for the company.


#24 Stephen

Stephen
  • Member
  • 1226 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:48 PM

Utter nonsense

#25 shakedownstreet

shakedownstreet
  • Member
  • 4293 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:49 PM

ah reckon it's about time to put out the far and call in the dawgs

Go to heaven for the climate, Go to he (double hockey-sticks) for the company.


#26 FireJimCaldwell

FireJimCaldwell
  • Member
  • 6076 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:50 PM

On the other hand, this happens all the time. I've never seen this type of comment punished before, not that I can remember at least. Someone else mentioned Rex Ryan's comments about Peyton Manning, and there's many other examples.


I guess it would all depend on exact quotes. I know that if I were Arians and I were fined then next week when asked about what are his thoughts about Chris Johnson or Jake Locker, I would be like. "Mr. Johnson & Mr. Locker are under contract with the Tennessee Titans, therefore NFL rules prohibit me from talking about a player under contract with another team". It would suck for the reporters, but it would prove a point. Then I would appeal the fine, and make it know that would be my stance for the rest of the season. "Mr. Schaub & Mr. Foster are under contract......"

In the least he might be fined 5-10k, but for those talking about losing draft picks, that is going a bit overboard.

#27 deedub75

deedub75
  • Member
  • 1264 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 02:53 PM

He should be fired and banned from the league for 10 years!
"I have 3 kids and no money. Why can't I have 3 money and no kids?" - Homer Simpson

#28 shakedownstreet

shakedownstreet
  • Member
  • 4293 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:00 PM

saints fans want roger goodell investigated for tampering

Go to heaven for the climate, Go to he (double hockey-sticks) for the company.


#29 Nobody

Nobody
  • Member
  • 3693 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:02 PM

He doesn't fit our scheme at all and he is 2 years away from FA. C'mon NFL, really?
I will delete this when the new Colts win a playoff game.
I will delete this when the new Colts win a Super Bowl.

#30 Tark The Shark

Tark The Shark
  • Member
  • 1969 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:28 PM

If the NFL fines us for Arian's comments, that would be ridiculous.

Just because he said he would love to have him on our team?

Heck, I would love to have Calvin Johnson on my fantasy team, is Goodell going to fine me now?
“Pressure is something you feel when you don't know what the heck you're doing.”- Peyton Manning

#31 HtownColt

HtownColt
  • Member
  • 3180 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:33 PM

In Suh's defense he had 1 penalty called on him all year according to Numbers Never Lie and that 500+ players have more personal foul penalties called on them than Suh this year

#32 braveheartcolt

braveheartcolt
  • Member
  • 2737 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:40 PM

I was Arians, and I got fined, I'd Suh.
"If I make a comment and it is not backed up by factual evidence, take it as my opinion, and my opinion only"....

#33 sb41champs

sb41champs
  • Member
  • 449 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:45 PM

Can you say..........

- oh wait - the NFL won't let me say that or they'll fine me !!

:blueshoe:    Veteran Free Agency  +  NFL Draft  =  Time to Sign McAfee to a LONG-TERM Contract   :blueshoe: 


#34 hawkeyes

hawkeyes
  • Member
  • 1316 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:45 PM

Come on Bruce we dont want that dirty player on our team!

:blueshoe: Lets Go Colts! :blueshoe:


#35 Gavin

Gavin
  • Member
  • 11198 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:46 PM

Just another example of Goodells foolish behavior as commisioner

#36 FireJimCaldwell

FireJimCaldwell
  • Member
  • 6076 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:46 PM

In Suh's defense he had 1 penalty called on him all year according to Numbers Never Lie and that 500+ players have more personal foul penalties called on them than Suh this year

He had an offsides penalty in week 2 and that is it.

#37 House

House
  • Member
  • 2334 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 03:57 PM

Dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb.
In another moment, down went Alice after it, never once considering how in the world she was to get out again.

#38 HtownColt

HtownColt
  • Member
  • 3180 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 04:00 PM

There is nothing to investigate. Since when is it a crime to give an all pro player credit for being a great player at his position

#39 JoKeR

JoKeR

    CANT STOP CLAPPING!!!!!

  • Member
  • 5306 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 04:03 PM

It's stuff like this that makes me hate the NFL. You can't say "he's a great player who wouldn't want him", or "he's ten pounds of dog crap in a five pound bag." The league needs to be investigated for being ridiculous. A word of warning to all.... don't compliment women if they are married because it can be considered tampering because she "could" get divorced in two years.

I'm out of Likes today, bravo sir.

#40 DarkHorseColts

DarkHorseColts
  • Member
  • 239 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 04:37 PM

"The league has declined comment on whether Arians’ comments violate the anti-tampering policy."


I'd like to interpret this as "yeah, he technically did it... but we are letting him off with a verbal warning, maybe a fine."






BUY YOUR COLTS SEASON TICKETS!

A limited number of season tickets are available CLICK TO BUY NOW OR CALL 317-299-4946.
Game Rewind: Indianapolis Colts

Recent Status Updates

View All Updates