Follow this link to enter the drawing for two tickets to the Chargers at Colts!
You must be logged in to enter the contests. Joining the forum is free.
I have to be honest, when inlooked at the list of name , at each position, that he kept on his roster, i really feel better about this team.
i'm not making light of our injuries at all. But seriously:
Qb: if #12 goes down, does it matter? I worry about Our depth here
rb: whether 4 or 5, interesting. If OL gives anything, this is a nice group
OL: when you see the list, looks very promising (ignoring injuries of course).
wr: very interesting and promising group
dl: very exciting possibilities
lb: question mark in my eyes
safety: if healthy, i like group
cb: if healthy, this group could be special, imo.
k/p:. We're good.
Is it just me, or does this look like a promising and exciting mix, overall. Of course, i'm ignoring injuries, but still.
I've always felt it should be cut to two games. The starters can play a majority of game one like they do game 3, then the second game for mostly backups like game 4 is.
At the very least it should be cut down to 3 games. Theres no reason to have 4 or 5 imo. Its risking more injuries, plus the common fan doesn't give a damn about 4 or 5 preseason games.
Hey wait a minute...Kaep was fined for saying the N word in a game a few years ago. He preceded it with the G and the D word. That basically gives him away. He knew his time in the NFL is up and he had to take a gamble.